|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone other than Brad Guth respond here?
On Mar 11, 9:16*pm, Andrew Usher wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: I think the major problem here is calculating frame dragging friction, which requires Einstein's equations. I don't know how to do it, myself. The 1600 light-year distance between us and this system is a negligible calculation by comparison. I thought it should have been calculated when this system was discovered. Surely the merger of two white dwarfs is an interesting occurrence! I'm wondering, if the two WDs are both ONe (making a supernova impossible), would they become a neutron star or a black hole? Andrew Usher Binary dwarfs as supposedly tidal face-locked and separated by just 80,000 km and .37 solar mass each. At some point in the near future, their ever increasing orbital frequency and the combined magnetic force has to take over and draw these two similar white dwarfs together, unless it’s running like a magnetic bearing that’s perpetually isolating one another regardless of those substantial gravitational forces (5.7e33 N). Electrons also repulse one another, which should also help prolong their binary status. At only 80,000 km separation, whereas being near equal mass is pretty much required, and otherwise I agree with Yousuf Khan. ~ BG |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes, confirmed
In article ,
Yousuf Khan writes: http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...rs-100309.html I can't offer an exact calculation of the time until merger, but the paper (Roelofs et al. 2010 ApJL 711, L138) gives an orbital frequency of about 3 mHz and derivative (df/dt) of about 3.6E-16 Hz/s. Dividing these gives 8E12 s or about 3E5 years. This is just a very rough estimate, of course. -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes, confirmed
In sci.astro message
oglegroups.com, Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:40:50, Andrew Usher posted: Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 9, 4:29*pm, Andrew Usher wrote: Yousuf Khan wrote: These two white dwarfs are so close together, that they might fall into each other some day. This would be an ideal test to see if two white dwarfs falling into each other produce a Type Ia supernova, leaving nothing behind. Or if they simply turn into a neutron star. How long should it be before we see the merger? Andrew Usher At 1600 light years, it probably already happened as of more than a thousand years ago. Can anyone confirm this? Guth is hardly reliable, and I have no idea how to calculate it myself. Other sources have 16,000 light years. But is Guth not *consistently* wrong? Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HM_Cancri says that Chandra shows that they are currently closing by about two feet per day, which is about a tenth of a mile per year. Wiki gives the separation as 50,000 miles. The closure rate will change with distance; but it would be IMHO remarkable if closure was expected in Guth's estimate of under 600 years, and surprising if under 16,000 years ERT. -- (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. Turnpike v6.05 MIME. Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQqish topics, acronyms & links; Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc. No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don't Mail News. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes,confirmed
On Mar 12, 12:20*pm, (Steve Willner) wrote:
In article , *Yousuf Khan writes: http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...rs-100309.html I can't offer an exact calculation of the time until merger, but the paper (Roelofs et al. 2010 ApJL 711, L138) gives an orbital frequency of about 3 mHz and derivative (df/dt) of about 3.6E-16 Hz/s. Dividing these gives 8E12 s or about 3E5 years. *This is just a very rough estimate, of course. -- Help keep our newsgroup healthy; please don't feed the trolls. Steve Willner * * * * * *Phone 617-495-7123 * * Cambridge, MA 02138 USA It could be a whole lot sooner than 300,000 years.* * The current -2 feet/day could turn into losing three, four, eight, sixteen/day and so forth within hardly a thousand years. "Chandra data (above, graph) from observations of RX J0806.3+1527 (or J0806), show that its X-ray intensity varies with a period of 321.5 seconds. This implies that J0806 is a binary star system where two white dwarf stars are orbiting each other (above, illustration) approximately every 5 minutes. The short orbital period implies that the stars are only about 50,000 miles apart, a fifth of the distance from the Earth to the Moon, and are moving in excess of a million miles per hour. According to Einstein's General Theory of Relativity, such a system should produce gravitational waves -ripples in space-time - that carry energy away from the system at the speed of light. Energy loss by gravitational waves will cause the stars to move closer together. X-ray and optical observations indicate that the orbital period of this system is decreasing by 1.2 milliseconds every year, which means that the stars are moving closer together at a rate of about 2 feet per day." http://chandra.harvard.edu/photo/2005/j0806/ http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ryqN6dyUmJg/0.jpg "With its extremely short orbital period, RX J0806.3+1527 is also a prime candidate for the detection of the elusive gravitational waves, predicted by Einstein's General Theory of Relativity. They have never been measured directly, but their existence has been revealed indirectly in binary neutron star systems. A planned gravitational wave space experiment, the European Space Agency's Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) that will be launched in about 10 years' time, will be sufficiently sensitive to be able to reveal this radiation from RX J0806.3+1527 with a high degree of confidence. Such an observational feat would open an entirely new window on the universe." http://www.eso.org/public/news/eso0211/ Binary dwarfs as supposedly tidal face-locked and separated by just 80,000 km and worth .37 solar mass each. At some point in the near future (perhaps a few thousands years from now), their ever increasing orbital frequency and the combined magnetic force has to take over and draw these two similar white dwarfs together, unless it’s running like a magnetic bearing that’s perpetually isolating one another regardless of those substantial gravitational forces (5.7e33 N). Electrons repulse one another, which should also help prolong their binary status. At only 80,000 km separation, whereas being near equal mass is pretty much required, and otherwise I agree with the final outcome being a neutron star unless the merger goes into a hyper/superluminal explosion where everything gets expelled. It’s actually more likely that Sirius(B) gets to become a neutron star about the same time as the human species goes extinct here on Earth. ~ BG |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes,confirmed
Dr J R Stockton wrote:
Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HM_Cancri says that Chandra shows that they are currently closing by about two feet per day, which is about a tenth of a mile per year. Wiki gives the separation as 50,000 miles. The closure rate will change with distance; but it would be IMHO remarkable if closure was expected in Guth's estimate of under 600 years, and surprising if under 16,000 years ERT. Thanks, this is what I needed. It will be over 100,000 years then, and we will not see it. It makes you wonder how they could have closed to the distance they are right now. I think gravitational radiation goes as (v'')^2 or 1/ r^7. Since potential energy goes as 1/r, dr/dt ~ 1/r^5. So in the entire age of the galaxy, they could only have closed from about 8 times as far as they are now, which is absurd. Or is there another factor? Andrew Usher |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone other than Brad Guth respond here?
Yousuf Khan wrote:
I thought it should have been calculated when this system was discovered. Surely the merger of two white dwarfs is an interesting occurrence! I'm wondering, if the two WDs are both ONe (making a supernova impossible), would they become a neutron star or a black hole? Neutron star, if they don't blow up instead. Oxygen-neon white dwarfs are at least 1.05 Msun and up to 1.37, so the combined mass could be 2.1-2.75 Msun. The limit for a neutron star is thought to be about 2.2, but could it lose enough mass while colliding to avoid becoming a black hole? Andrew Usher |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes,confirmed
On Mar 12, 6:59*pm, Andrew Usher wrote:
Dr J R Stockton wrote: Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HM_Cancri says that Chandra shows that they are currently closing by about two feet per day, which is about a tenth of a mile per year. *Wiki gives the separation as 50,000 miles. *The closure rate will change with distance; but it would be IMHO remarkable if closure was expected in Guth's estimate of under 600 years, and surprising if under 16,000 years ERT. Thanks, this is what I needed. It will be over 100,000 years then, and we will not see it. I wouldn't go with 100,000 years. My initial swag of 600 years is a wee bit short, although a few thousand years might be more likely. It makes you wonder how they could have closed to the distance they are right now. I think gravitational radiation goes as (v'')^2 or 1/ r^7. Since potential energy goes as 1/r, dr/dt ~ 1/r^5. So in the entire age of the galaxy, they could only have closed from about 8 times as far as they are now, which is absurd. Or is there another factor? Andrew Usher Cosmic mergers, like the one(s) which created our galaxy and gave birth to the likes of Sirius ABC. Also, nothing out there runs linear. Ever heard of the golden ratio or phi = 1.618034 ~ BG |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Can anyone other than Brad Guth respond here?
Andrew Usher wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote: I thought it should have been calculated when this system was discovered. Surely the merger of two white dwarfs is an interesting occurrence! I'm wondering, if the two WDs are both ONe (making a supernova impossible), would they become a neutron star or a black hole? Neutron star, if they don't blow up instead. Oxygen-neon white dwarfs are at least 1.05 Msun and up to 1.37, so the combined mass could be 2.1-2.75 Msun. The limit for a neutron star is thought to be about 2.2, but could it lose enough mass while colliding to avoid becoming a black hole? Andrew Usher My feeling is that the limit is thought to be 2.8 Msun between neutron star and black hole, though I'm sure there's plenty of overlap here. The smallest stellar mass black hole found to date is about 3.8 Msun, though we might find smaller. XTE J1650-500 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XTE_J1650-500 Whether a core becomes a neutron star or a black hole probably depends on how much compression it underwent when being formed during original blow-off phase. Usually that amount of compression is dependent on the mass of the progenitor star, but it wouldn't surprise me that some nuclear forces could aid gravity in the compression mechanism, thus within certain range of masses we might see some become black holes and some become neutron stars. Thus I don't see two white dwarfs ever forming a black hole, because they simply don't create a compressive force on each other's cores when they merge; in fact, I'd say it's mostly tensile during this time. Now as for the 2.2 Msun neutron star limit, that may just be the limit for normal neutron stars. There are subspecies of neutron stars that have been proposed with higher masses, such as: quark stars, strange stars, and most recently electroweak stars. Yousuf Khan |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes,confirmed
Andrew Usher wrote:
Thanks, this is what I needed. It will be over 100,000 years then, and we will not see it. It makes you wonder how they could have closed to the distance they are right now. I think gravitational radiation goes as (v'')^2 or 1/ r^7. Since potential energy goes as 1/r, dr/dt ~ 1/r^5. So in the entire age of the galaxy, they could only have closed from about 8 times as far as they are now, which is absurd. Or is there another factor? Andrew Usher They're only this close because they have been orbiting within each other's gas envelopes as each one took their turns becoming red giants. Combination of aerodynamic friction and gas exchange changing up their orbital relationships. Now that neither of them have any gas left, they will only approach each other through the gravitational friction method. Yousuf Khan |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Two white dwarf stars orbiting each other every five minutes,confirmed
On Mar 13, 1:33*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Andrew Usher wrote: Thanks, this is what I needed. It will be over 100,000 years then, and we will not see it. It makes you wonder how they could have closed to the distance they are right now. I think gravitational radiation goes as (v'')^2 or 1/ r^7. Since potential energy goes as 1/r, dr/dt ~ 1/r^5. So in the entire age of the galaxy, they could only have closed from about 8 times as far as they are now, which is absurd. Or is there another factor? Andrew Usher They're only this close because they have been orbiting within each other's gas envelopes as each one took their turns becoming red giants. Combination of aerodynamic friction and gas exchange changing up their orbital relationships. Now that neither of them have any gas left, they will only approach each other through the gravitational friction method. * * * * Yousuf Khan Plus attracted to one another by their magnetic forces (especially if poles flip) which can be rather considerable. ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
After the sun becomes a white dwarf, how long will it take to become a black dwarf? | Radium[_2_] | Research | 3 | July 16th 07 10:53 PM |
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 24th 07 09:45 PM |
White dwarf and ultra-cool dwarf keep their distance (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | April 24th 07 08:57 PM |
Some Rare Abnormal Stars may have White Dwarf Parents to Blame (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | January 11th 07 05:33 PM |
Some Rare Abnormal Stars may have White Dwarf Parents to Blame(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 11th 07 05:31 PM |