|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
distribution of galaxies implies a cosmic atom; Chapt.10; #181; 3rded; Atom Totality theory
As mentioned in previous posts, I will start 4th edition
of this book as soon as this 3rd is completed in that I need this book organized for once. I have posts scattered from different chapters and is annoying. So I want this book organized and will devote full attention to that prospect. High Energy Ray from direction of Centaurus Anyway, there is news from Univ Chicago and the South American telescopes of these High Energy Cosmic Rays or Gamma bursts. And their reports in the latest science journals. And they claim the source are 13 million light years away of the Centaurus A, Hamburger Galaxy. And they seem to think that their galactic nucleus is the source of those high energy bursts. But I have my doubts. Since their mind frame is within a Big Bang theory and blackhole nonsense. While my mind is with Atom Totality where the nucleus of the Atom Totality is in the direction of the Great Attractor and the Sloan Great Wall. So that according to my way of thinking that most of these high energy Rays would come from the direction of the Great Attractor and Sloan Great Wall. So I had a Google search for Centaurus Great Attractor Sloan Great Wall and found these hits: What is the Large-Scale Structure of the Cosmos? The largest known structure in the cosmos is the Sloan Great Wall, ... anomaly in the adjacent Hydra-Centaurus supercluster known as the Great Attractor. ... http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-...the-cosmos.htm - 20k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this Large-scale structure of the cosmos - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Several superclusters stand out, such as the Sloan Great Wall, the largest structure in the ... in the direction of the Hydra and Centaurus constellations. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large-scale_structure_of_the_cosmos - 43k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this Astrophysics Majors Senior Thesis: "Portrait of the Sloan Great Wall" Advisor: Richard Gott. Lear Janiv Senior Thesis: "The Local Galactic Escape Velocity: The Mass of the ... http://www.astro.princeton.edu/acade...s_research.htm - 39k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this [PDF] arXiv:astro-ph/0610762 v1 25 Oct 2006 File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML partly due to the Sloan Great Wall of Galaxies; this shift also appears in a sub-sample not ..... the Sloan Great Wall which Gott et al. (2006) measured ... arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0610762 - Similar pages - Note this [PDF] arXiv:astro-ph/0408583 v1 31 Aug 2004 File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML and distance (Gott et al. 2003) clearly shows the largest structure seen to date, a "Sloan. Great Wall" that extends over roughly 420h ... arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0408583 - Similar pages - Note this Front: [astro-ph/0610762] Topology of structure in the Sloan ... The data show a ``meatball'' shift (only partly due to the Sloan Great Wall of Galaxies; this shift also appears in a sub-sample not containing the Wall) ... front.math.ucdavis.edu/0610.1762 - 6k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this Mapping the cosmic web with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey 2003) clearly shows the largest structure seen to date, a "Sloan. Great Wall" that extends over roughly 420h. -1. Mpc. This supercluster- scale structure ... journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext? fulltextid=250742 - --- I believe there is more of a correlation of the Cosmic Rays and Gamma Rays as aligned with the Great Attractor and Sloan Great Wall than there is any other correlation. In the Atom Totality, most Dirac radioactivity goes into growing new stars and galaxies, but a predominant amount of "Dirac Radioactivity" should be observable in the direction of the Nucleus of the Atom Totality and that direction is a line of sight from Earth to the Great Attractor and Sloan Great Wall. So apparently Centaurus is in that line of sight. Now, not all high energy Rays have to fall in that line of sight to support the Atom Totality theory but a large majority of those Rays should come from that line of sight since that is the Nucleus of the Atom Totality which is the source of Dirac Radioactivity as outlined in his book Directions in Physics. Now recent news of a journal report of a high energy Ray in the direction of Centaurus A about 13.7 million light years away and of another Ray about 326 million light years away makes me want to give some order to these newsflashes because they do not make the basic information briefing. They neglect to tell us what position of the Cosmic Sky those Rays are in the "direction of" and that is a very important piece of information. Because the direction of drawing a straight line from Earth to the Great Attractor which also has the Great Wall and then the Sloan Great Wall all involved in this one straight line drawn. Of course this information belittles the Big Bang theory and places it in jeopardy as being a fake theory. But scientists need to be more precise and detailed and focused in their reports. They seem to want to tell us how far away Centaurus A is from Earth but they never seem to want to say where in the Cosmic Sky that Centaurus is relative to a straight line drawn from Earth to the Great Attractor. So that if scientists had said in this newsflash that Centaurus A was directly on that Cosmic line of sight to the Great Attractor and Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall, then they would have made a far better report then their sloppy report. Now here I have gathered a partial list of Cosmic Gamma Rays: --- quoting Wikipedia --- GRBs of significant historical or scientific importance include: * 670702: The first GRB ever detected.[28] * 970228: The first GRB with a successfully detected afterglow. The location of the afterglow was coincident with a very faint galaxy, providing strong evidence that GRBs are extragalactic.[29] * 970508: The first GRB with a measured redshift (distance). At z=0.835, it confirmed unambiguously that GRBs are extragalactic.[30] * 971214: In 1997, this was believed by some to be the most energetic event in the universe. This claim has since been discredited.[31][32] * 980425: The first GRB with an observed associated supernova (1998bw), providing strong evidence of the link between GRBs and supernovae. The GRB itself was very unusual for being extremely underluminous. Also the closest GRB to date.[33] * 990123: This GRB had the optically brightest afterglow measured to date, momentarily reaching or exceeding a magnitude of 8.9, which would be visible with an ordinary pair of binoculars, despite its distance of nearly 10 billion light years. This was also the first GRB for which optical emission was detected before the gamma-ray emission had ceased.[34] * 030329A: An extremely close (z=0.168),[35] and therefore extremely bright GRB, with an unambiguous supernova association.[36] GRB 030329 was so bright that its gamma radiation ionized the Earth's upper atmosphere.[37] * 050509B: The first short GRB with a host association. Provided evidence that (some) short GRBs, unlike long GRBs, occur in old galaxies and do not have accompanying supernovae.[38] * 050724: A thoroughly observed short gamma-ray burst with an afterglow suggesting the demise of a neutron star orbiting a black hole.[39] * 050904: The most distant GRB observed as of 2005, at z=6.29 (13 billion light-years).[40] * 060218: A low-redshift GRB with an accompanying supernova.[41] * 060505: The first, well-observed, long duration GRB not accompanied by a bright supernova.[42] --- end quoting an encyclopedia --- Now what I will try to track down is whether any or many of the above originated from the line of sight of Earth to the Great Attractor. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
distribution and density of galaxies matches dot pattern of plutoniumatom, Chp 10; #179; Atom Totality theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | November 14th 09 03:54 AM |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 08:29 AM |
whether I can believe most stars are solo and not binary; #168; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 22nd 09 07:18 AM |
CellWell1 & 2; how water gets concentrated on astro bodies #160; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 20th 09 08:28 AM |
Cangaroo Cosmic (gamma) Ray project for southern hemisphere #120; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 4th 09 07:45 PM |