|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
chapter 10: density & distribution of galaxies; #178 ATOM TOTALITY
The single most strongest evidence of the Atom Totality and the fakery of the Big Bang theory is the distribution and density of the galaxies. This evidence is the Sloan Great Wall density of galaxies next to the Great Wall of galaxies. In other words, a Big Bang theory is dead because it can never explain why the density of galaxies is hugely dense in one spot of the Cosmos and thins out everywhere else. Where there are dense clusters of galaxies intermittent between voids of galaxies, which reminds one of the diffraction pattern seen in the Double Slit Experiment. The Atom Totality theory easily explains density of galaxies as that the Great Walls are closer to the Nucleus of the Atom Totality. And the overall dense clusters intermittent by voids is what happens in a Schrodinger Equation of the density and distribution of the dots of the electron-dot-cloud in a atom. So of all the supporting evidence for the Atom Totality theory the most damaging to the Big Bang is the fact of density of galaxies implies the Universe is a single big atom and the Nucleus of the Atom Totality is nearby to the Sloan Great Wall. If you ask me now in year 2009 what is my favorite single piece of evidence that the Atom Totality is true and the Big Bang is false is a piece of evidence that has not even raised a debate or clamour or raucous in either the physics or astronomy community. In fact, it was only recently discovered of the Sloan Great Wall. It was recently discovered that the Great Wall has a larger and more dense structure nearby and called the Sloan Great Wall. This Sloan Great Wall of galaxies is my single favorite supporting evidence that the Atom Totality is the true theory and the Big Bang a fake. Why do I say that? Because the Big Bang cannot have a Universe that is dense with galaxies in one spot and successively have intermittent dense sheets with voids and overall thins out the further one goes from the Sloan Great Wall (alleged nucleus). The Big Bang explosion creates a Cosmos where a large enough cross section is uniformly dense of galaxies. By contrast, the inside of an atom has its electron dot cloud dense near the nucleus and thinning out the further away you get from the nucleus. In physics, some experiments are special and some observations are special. They are what is called Deciding Experiments or Deciding Observations. They are special because they decide which of two theories is the true one and which is the fake one. The observation of missing mass as 99% missing is not a Deciding Observation since the Big Bang could say the missing mass is dark-matter and thus cannot really decide between the two theories. But the observation that the density of galaxies is dense near the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall but thins out uniformly and intermittent with sheets of galaxies then voids beyond them is a deciding-observation for there cannot be an explanation of this in the Big Bang theory. Likewise the Tifft quantized galaxy speeds was a deciding-observation for you cannot have quantization of galaxy speeds in the Big Bang. The Freedman-Sandage debate over the age of the Cosmos was not a deciding experiment or deciding observation since both were fuzzy as to their ages and where precision of measurement is not really available that would lay to rest the fierce and contentious debate. But there is no question of the fact of quantized galaxy speeds or the two dense Great Walls. So as it stands here in November 2009, my single favorite piece of evidence is the density of Great Walls of galaxies which describes the dots of the electron-dot-cloud of an atom and my second favorite evidence is the Tifft quantized galaxy speeds. One would think that when I first posted on the Internet the Atom Totality, and who accepted and believed in the Tifft quantized galaxy speeds would immediately embrace the Atom Totality theory, for the two are part and parcel of one another. The dots of the electron-dot-cloud are quantized. Maybe they did embrace the Atom Totality theory but were not going to publically say so. I need to voice alot about the naming of this theory which I discovered in November of 1990. I originally gave it a name of something like "Atom Universe" or "Single Atom Universe" or "Plutonium Atom Universe". But I did not like the term "universe" because that term is so overused that it lacked the power of description of the theory. I do not know where the term "Big Bang" was first used to give name to that theory, but it is a very good name because it conjers the image of a cosmic explosion. They could have named it the Cosmic Explosion Theory instead of the Big Bang. So the first several years after discovery of the Atom Totality theory I never used the name "Atom Totality" but used some variations of "Atom Universe". And then some years after 1990, someone blurted out the name "Atom Totality" and I recognized instantly that such a name was superior to the name "Atom Universe" or "Single Atom Universe" or "Atom Whole Universe" or other variations. In science, it is important to give the best name to a theory as what you can possibly give, for if you do not then someone else in the future will rename it. And the best name is one in which it best describes the theory in as few of words as possible. Given just two words, the name Atom Totality is the best name I can think of for the theory. The word "Universe" in "Atom Universe" is too nebulous (sorry for the pun). For the term "Universe" in "Atom Universe" can have several different meanings such as "atoms exist in the universe." But the name "Atom Totality" has the meaning that the Universe or Cosmos is a single big atom. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 09 08:29 AM |
mean density of planets and satellites; #150; 3rd ed; Atom Totality(Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 17th 09 01:28 AM |
mean density of Jupiter moons follows pattern of the inner planets ;#148; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 16th 09 06:23 AM |
still on chapter 4: and GR is replaced by ocean-of-positrons #126 :3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 7th 09 08:53 AM |
#11 Chapter 3, (3) density and distribution of galaxies ; 3rd edition | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | May 5th 09 06:15 PM |