|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
No, it's the rotation causing the difference, fool! 1000 miles per
hour makes a lot of difference. 13 miles is nothing! You're lack of physics knowledge is well known around here! Saul Levy On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:15:40 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Saul the half of one percent increase of gravity is that the poles are 13 miles closer to the earth's center. I'm wasting my time reasoning with a half wit. Bert |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
nightbat wrote
Saul Levy wrote: No, it's the rotation causing the difference, fool! 1000 miles per hour makes a lot of difference. 13 miles is nothing! You're lack of physics knowledge is well known around here! Saul Levy On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:15:40 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Saul the half of one percent increase of gravity is that the poles are 13 miles closer to the earth's center. I'm wasting my time reasoning with a half wit. Bert nightbat No no, our saul is not a half wit Officer Bert he is half baked from the on going no shade desert 100+ temps. I deduce there is a difference for if he was a half wit he wouldn't be asking you to please explain everything to him, but since he's half baked he doesn't know when to quit. carry on, the nightbat |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
nightbat I gave Saul the best advice. he should bake "matzo" bread on
the hot desert sand,as the Jewish woman did it when walking the desert of the Sinai with Moses. What I told him about the reason for stronger gravity at the poles was not my own answer but he should read Asmonov book on "Physics" Saul's head is flat baked,just like matzo. Matzo needs yeast Saul's brain needs a transplant. Bert |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
Meaningless drivel, frootie!
Saul Levy On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 07:05:28 -0400, nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote Saul Levy wrote: No, it's the rotation causing the difference, fool! 1000 miles per hour makes a lot of difference. 13 miles is nothing! You're lack of physics knowledge is well known around here! Saul Levy On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 07:15:40 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Saul the half of one percent increase of gravity is that the poles are 13 miles closer to the earth's center. I'm wasting my time reasoning with a half wit. Bert nightbat No no, our saul is not a half wit Officer Bert he is half baked from the on going no shade desert 100+ temps. I deduce there is a difference for if he was a half wit he wouldn't be asking you to please explain everything to him, but since he's half baked he doesn't know when to quit. carry on, the nightbat |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
Saul Levy wrote:
No, it's the rotation causing the difference, fool! 1000 miles per hour makes a lot of difference. 13 miles is nothing! You're lack of physics knowledge is well known around here! Saul Levy Though I would be the first to claim nightbat has at best two brain cells with which to spark anything within his cranal cavity, and my pointing out of Bert's scientific ineptness is well documented in this group, in this case, Bert got one right (you get lucky if you guess often enough). The gravitational force at the equator is roughly 313 times greater than the contribution due to the Earth's rotation (the centripetal force acting on a body. A 200 lb person would pick up about 0.64 pounds due to that rotation. A person weighing 200 lb on the equator would weigh 201.3 lb at the poles precisely because that person is a bit closer to Earth's center there than at the equator. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
Oh, O.K., Scott. Finally we get some real answers instead of the
usual saucerhead ****! Thanks! Saul Levy On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 00:21:38 -0400, Scott Miller wrote: Saul Levy wrote: No, it's the rotation causing the difference, fool! 1000 miles per hour makes a lot of difference. 13 miles is nothing! You're lack of physics knowledge is well known around here! Saul Levy Though I would be the first to claim nightbat has at best two brain cells with which to spark anything within his cranal cavity, and my pointing out of Bert's scientific ineptness is well documented in this group, in this case, Bert got one right (you get lucky if you guess often enough). The gravitational force at the equator is roughly 313 times greater than the contribution due to the Earth's rotation (the centripetal force acting on a body. A 200 lb person would pick up about 0.64 pounds due to that rotation. A person weighing 200 lb on the equator would weigh 201.3 lb at the poles precisely because that person is a bit closer to Earth's center there than at the equator. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
Scott You took my answer over Saul . Hard for me to believe. I've been
right before,but it went over your head for what I had to say was not in Google . Best you raise your head when reading my answers to the mysteries of the universe Well back to science Just saying closer to the Earth's poles is the strongest gravitational area is right,but that begs the question why? I know the answer do you Scott? Gets kind of tricky knowing that gravity is zero at the Earth's exact center Bert PS Saul don't feel to bad lots of people are just as dense as you. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
Scott my little gyro answers the question. I hope you can think on your
own as to how this can be reality. Bert |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
You should talk! **** OFF, BEERTbrain!
Saul Levy On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 08:31:11 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Scott You took my answer over Saul . Hard for me to believe. I've been right before,but it went over your head for what I had to say was not in Google . Best you raise your head when reading my answers to the mysteries of the universe Well back to science Just saying closer to the Earth's poles is the strongest gravitational area is right,but that begs the question why? I know the answer do you Scott? Gets kind of tricky knowing that gravity is zero at the Earth's exact center Bert PS Saul don't feel to bad lots of people are just as dense as you. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Why are we orbiting around the sun not towards it?
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
Scott You took my answer over Saul . Hard for me to believe. I've been right before,but it went over your head for what I had to say was not in Google . Best you raise your head when reading my answers to the mysteries of the universe Well back to science Just saying closer to the Earth's poles is the strongest gravitational area is right,but that begs the question why? I know the answer do you Scott? Gets kind of tricky knowing that gravity is zero at the Earth's exact center Bert PS Saul don't feel to bad lots of people are just as dense as you. Actually, you blathering makes only partial sense - I have no idea of what you are talking about in the first three sentences. I do know I have done the calculations related to this weight at poles versus equator versus rotational contribution and simply reproduced it. As to why the Earth's pull is as if all the mass is concentrated at the center, yes, I do know - calculus is a wonderful thing for determining this answer. If one looks at the vector contributions of all the matter in the Earth, the vector sum of all those contributions can lead to a net contribution at the center. And, before you go knocking Saul - my observations are that he has much more on the ball than you, and when you add nightbat's contributions, he still comes out ahead (adding zero to any nonzero value is just that value back again). You got this one right but couldn't demonstrate why. So don't gloat. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still-Forming Solar System May Have Planets Orbiting Star in Opposite Directions, Astronomers Say | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | February 14th 06 05:33 PM |
Still-Forming Solar System May Have Planets Orbiting Star in Opposite Directions, Astronomers Say | [email protected] | News | 0 | February 14th 06 05:32 PM |
Moon discovered orbiting 10th planet: New class of satellites discovered(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 4th 05 04:11 AM |
Network of Small Telescopes Discovers Distant Planet Orbiting Another Star | Ron | Astronomy Misc | 13 | October 29th 04 11:11 PM |
Network of Small Telescopes Discovers Distant Planet Orbiting Another Star | Ron | Misc | 1 | August 24th 04 07:27 PM |