NEWSALERT: Thursday, March 10, 2011 @ 1536 GMT

On 11 Mar., 06:12, a lunatic scribbled:

all the wrong reasons.

There is no point in arguing with raving lunatic.

On Mar 11, 6:16*am, "Chris.B" wrote:
On 11 Mar., 06:12, a lunatic scribbled:

all the wrong reasons.

There is no point in arguing with raving lunatic.

You fall into that category.

No problem with the hostility directed towards me but the idea that
someone could intentionally go out of their way to ignore that the 365
1/4 rotations in one orbital circuit is grouped as 365 and 366
rotations in order to allow for a format using a steady progression of
days which mirror the proportion between daily rotations and one
orbital cycle.

There is no point to astronomy without the basic astronomical facts
which link terrestrial sciences to planetary dynamics where huge
modifications are in order to bring conceptions into line with modern
imaging and especially view of the Earth from space yet it remains a
crisis only as long as there is this mass self-deception using a
useless late 17th century ideology which jumped to a wrong conclusion.

What is is with readers here ?,is there some hideous side to your
personality that prevents you from acknowledging that Friday, March
11th 2011 is both a 24 hour rotation and a day/night cycle with Feb
29th 2012 representing the same fact with the exception that it
represents the accumulated orbital distance omitted each non-leap year
as expressed through a full 24 hours of rotation.

Should readers wish to know why there is nothing new or exciting and
only empirical scams abound,they will find it where they least expect
it -

"There is another astronomical effect you should know about that can
change the time that the Sun is highest in the sky. This is a little
hard to explain, but it also has to do with us watching the Sun from a
tilted perspective. The Earth spins on its axis about 366 and 1/4
times each year, but there are only 365 and 1/4 days per year." NASA

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/as...rs/970714.html

Are you all entirely content with this hypocrisy which amounts to an
attack on the correspondence between 365 1/4 daylight/darkness cycles
in an orbital year corresponding to 365 1/4 rotations with only a
brief detour into the calendar system to affirm it.No problem that all
of you continue to believe you are astronomers and act as if nothing
has happened but nothing could be further from the truth.

On 11 Mar., 12:26, Whensenseless scribbled with his favourite, Nazi
dagger:

You fall into that category.

But then so does everybody else on the planet by your sick, extremist
standards. So I am in very good company, Psycko. :-)

On Mar 11, 5:52*pm, oriel36 wrote:
No problem with the hostility directed towards me but the idea that
someone could intentionally go out of their way to ignore that the 365
1/4 rotations in one orbital circuit is grouped as 365 and 366
rotations in order to allow for a format using a steady progression of
days which mirror the proportion between daily rotations and one
orbital cycle.

There is no point to astronomy without the basic astronomical facts
which link terrestrial sciences to planetary dynamics where huge
modifications are in order to bring conceptions into line with modern
imaging and especially view of the Earth from space yet it remains a
crisis only as long as there is this mass self-deception using a
useless late 17th century ideology which jumped to a wrong conclusion.

What is is with readers here ?,is there some hideous side to your
personality that prevents you from acknowledging that Friday, March
11th 2011 is both a 24 hour rotation and a day/night cycle with Feb
29th 2012 representing the same fact with the exception that it
represents the accumulated orbital distance omitted each non-leap year
as expressed through a full 24 hours of rotation.

Should readers wish to know why there is nothing new or exciting and
only empirical scams abound,they will find it where they least expect
it -

"There is another astronomical effect you should know about that can
change the time that the Sun is highest in the sky. This is a little
hard to explain, but it also has to do with us watching the Sun from a
tilted perspective. The Earth spins on its axis about 366 and 1/4
times each year, but there are only 365 and 1/4 days per year." NASA

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/as...rs/970714.html

Are you all entirely content with this hypocrisy which amounts to an
attack on the correspondence between 365 1/4 daylight/darkness cycles
in an orbital year corresponding to 365 1/4 rotations with only a
brief detour into the calendar system to affirm it.No problem that all
of you continue to believe you are astronomers and act as if nothing
has happened but nothing could be further from the truth.

Yes content but not entirely since it describes the Earth as having a
circular orbit. OK it's a simplification for the answer but, like all
your "theories" it's still wrong.

On Mar 11, 10:00*pm, Mike Collins wrote:
On Mar 11, 5:52*pm, oriel36 wrote:









No problem with the hostility directed towards me but the idea that
someone could intentionally go out of their way to ignore that the 365
1/4 rotations in one orbital circuit is grouped as 365 and 366
rotations in order to allow for a format using a steady progression of
days which mirror the proportion between daily rotations and one
orbital cycle.

There is no point to astronomy without the basic astronomical facts
which link terrestrial sciences to planetary dynamics where huge
modifications are in order to bring conceptions into line with modern
imaging and especially view of the Earth from space yet it remains a
crisis only as long as there is this mass self-deception using a
useless late 17th century ideology which jumped to a wrong conclusion.

What is is with readers here ?,is there some hideous side to your
personality that prevents you from acknowledging that Friday, March
11th 2011 is both a 24 hour rotation and a day/night cycle with Feb
29th 2012 representing the same fact with the exception that it
represents the accumulated orbital distance omitted each non-leap year
as expressed through a full 24 hours of rotation.

Should readers wish to know why there is nothing new or exciting and
only empirical scams abound,they will find it where they least expect
it -

"There is another astronomical effect you should know about that can
change the time that the Sun is highest in the sky. This is a little
hard to explain, but it also has to do with us watching the Sun from a
tilted perspective. The Earth spins on its axis about 366 and 1/4
times each year, but there are only 365 and 1/4 days per year." NASA

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/as...rs/970714.html

Are you all entirely content with this hypocrisy which amounts to an
attack on the correspondence between 365 1/4 daylight/darkness cycles
in an orbital year corresponding to 365 1/4 rotations with only a
brief detour into the calendar system to affirm it.No problem that all
of you continue to believe you are astronomers and act as if nothing
has happened but nothing could be further from the truth.

Yes content but not entirely since it describes the Earth as having a
circular orbit. OK it's a simplification for the answer but, like all
your "theories" it's still wrong.

These things do not represent theories as they are basic astronomical
facts which are easily interpreted but when I need to speculate in the
absence of definite observations then I can indulge in a type of
speculation that is highly disciplined and extremely relevant such as
when the dynamic behind crustal motion and evolution has the highest
probability arising from the rotating fluid interior of the Earth and
specifically a trait common to all rotating spherical bodies with
mainly viscous compositions - differential rotation or an uneven
rotational gradient between equatorial and polar coordinates.

The severe earthquake in Japan may be the end result of a continuing
process arising from the rotating Earth along with the huge clue of
the 26 mile spherical deviation between equatorial and polar
diameters,while nobody has said it outright,it is just one of these
things which people pick up on and like the orbital daylight/darkness
cycle will eventually come around to a more productive view.

As for you unfortunate people and the once great institutions like
NASA,perhaps that is the way of things as it is not the just the
shuttle fading into history but the organization that once had its
perspectives and direction in order.