|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
John Steinberg wrote:
Carsten A. Arnholm wrote: Yes. Launch the shuttle first and *then* apply the foam. FYI: http://facilities.grc.nasa.gov/spf/ I've just done some very quick scratch figuring and the real answer isn't better foam application but rather a better ablative material. Turns out my materials science manual has the answer on page 831. Duct tape. Alas, you neglect the OTHER reason there's foam on the external tank. Lots of stuff is ablative to resist heat loads on ascent. If that was all there was to it, there'd be a think spray on layer of fiberglass or something there. The pre-launch reason to have foam there is to prevent ice buildup on the outside of the tank. Because, if you think foam shedding is bad for Shuttle Tiles and RCC leading edge sections, you should see what ten pounds of nice solid liquid-hydrogen subchilled water ice will do to any surface of the shuttle... Foam on the outside does both jobs. Foam on the inside of the tanks would help prevent water ice buildup on the outside, but not help with ascent heating. External ablative shielding plus internal foam would do both better than we get right now, but would be heavier. And any solution involving internal insulation will require testing and safety validation. -george william herbert / |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 4th 05 07:50 AM |
NASA Acknowledges That Even Little Pieces of Foam Could Doom Space Shuttle on Next Flight | Bill | Space Shuttle | 5 | April 16th 05 01:08 AM |
Columbia: A Secret Contingency Plan? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 21 | January 13th 04 07:37 PM |
The Shuttle Columbia Whitewash | Peter J Ross | Space Shuttle | 18 | September 3rd 03 03:28 AM |
Shuttle Foam Test Yields Hole in Wing - Associated Press | Rusty B | History | 8 | July 10th 03 12:05 AM |