|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Puppet Masters of Phoebos
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Puppet Masters of Phoebos
Cris Fitch wrote: (Al Jackson) wrote... Its been thought of. http://www.marsinstitute.info/rd/fac.../rtr/pf19.html Very nice. It would be nice if the study itself were to be put on-line. I wonder what the pro's and con's are for Deimos vs. Phobos for a base. Might want to do a better survey of both (searching for useful elements) before deciding. - Cris Deimos is close to Mars synchronous orbit. It'd be a good place to make Mars synchronous satellites. Maybe with time a Mars synchronous satellite made from Deimos materials could be expanded to a beanstalk. A survey of Phobos and Deimos is at the top of my wish list, along with surveys of accessible NEOs. -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Puppet Masters of Phoebos
Cris Fitch wrote: So you want to go to Mars. And you think our robot friends will pave the way. But the delay to the folks back on Earth is a little long to provide interactive control. We also want an intermediate destination as a prelude to putting a man on the surface and the problems associated with getting him back out of that gravity well. Perhaps the solution is a small, temporary, manned out- post on Phoebos. Their main objective: controlling the robots on the surface that are laying the foundation for the manned landing. Any thoughts? - Cris Fitch San Diego, CA http://www.orbit6.com/ There seem to be a growing number supporting NEO exploitation as NEOs are more accessible (with their shallow gravity wells) and possibly have useful resources. Some NEO advocates like Phobos and Deimos for these same reasons. Plus the fact you can use Martian aerobraking to shed momentum (wrt Mars) and end up in the Martian neighborhood with little delta vee. See for example: http://www.spacefuture.com/archive/t..._company.shtml -- Hop David http://clowder.net/hop/index.html |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Puppet Masters of Phoebos
(Cris Fitch) wrote in message . com...
(Al Jackson) wrote... Its been thought of. http://www.marsinstitute.info/rd/fac.../rtr/pf19.html Very nice. It would be nice if the study itself were to be put on-line. I wonder what the pro's and con's are for Deimos vs. Phobos for a base. Might want to do a better survey of both (searching for useful elements) before deciding. - Cris Fred had a followup on it he http://www.sepp.org/NewSEPP/phDmission(2).htm |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Puppet Masters of Phoebos
"Mike Rhino" wrote in message
... "Cardman" wrote in message ... On 22 Jan 2004 09:01:46 -0800, (Cris Fitch) wrote: So you want to go to Mars. And you think our robot friends will pave the way. But the delay to the folks back on Earth is a little long to provide interactive control. We also want an intermediate destination as a prelude to putting a man on the surface and the problems associated with getting him back out of that gravity well. Perhaps the solution is a small, temporary, manned out- post on Phoebos. Their main objective: controlling the robots on the surface that are laying the foundation for the manned landing. Any thoughts? Sounds like a good idea, but if they can build a base on Phobos, then they can also build a base in orbit. So the question is... What does Phobos have that we need? Radiation Shielding which makes an inflatable habitat more viable. Has any work been done on hibernation for space flights? There is full hibernation and there is bear type hibernation. Bears pretty much sleep through the winter. Humans should be able to do the same thing. This would simplify radiation shielding, because you could cram all the astronauts into a tiny area during the flight. If they got up twice a week to go to the bathroom, that would be OK. The moon's gravity is so weak, that one could extract material to be used for radiation shielding for a space station in a similar orbit. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|