|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
somewhere along the line war changed...........
In the old days it meant we used OVERWHELMING FORCE, decimated the place taking out all key roads bridges and utilities. Basically destroyed the place making the residents homeless and helpless. The we tried the new way vietnam, the clean humane war. Minimize at all costs civilian casulaties, knock the power grid off line but do no major long term damage, accept more troop losses for US, while trying to be nice..And do it all WITHOUT overwhelming force.... Can this really be effective? When we decimated the country we attacked the residents knew they lost and needed us desperately to survive. Plus we already had enough troops on site to provide pretty good security Now compare the old wars like WW1 & WW 2 with the transitional one korea, cuba, vietnam, iraq and now afghanistan. Its my sad belief the country being attacked must KNOW IT LOST, to truly accept our help and reform its ways and become respectable.......... Their hearts and minds must accept we lost theres no other way than accept the US, and join them........ War is ugly, civilians die, and trying to have clean wars just drag out the hostilties for all sides withno real conclusion. Nce the US leaves iraq the problem will likely return.......... Plus the US cant be the worlds cop, theres too many bad guys and not enough of us... Although this is a seperate issue |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
On Feb 21, 8:55*am, " wrote:
somewhere along the line war changed........... In the old days it meant we used OVERWHELMING FORCE, decimated the place taking out all key roads bridges and utilities. Basically destroyed the place making the residents homeless and helpless. The we tried the new way vietnam, the clean humane war. Minimize at all costs civilian casulaties, knock the power grid off line but do no major long term damage, accept more troop losses for US, while trying to be nice..And do it all WITHOUT overwhelming force.... Can this really be effective? When we decimated the country we attacked the residents knew they lost and needed us desperately to survive. Plus we already had enough troops on site to provide pretty good security Now compare the old wars like WW1 & WW 2 *with the transitional one korea, cuba, *vietnam, iraq and now afghanistan. Its my sad belief the country being attacked must KNOW IT LOST, to truly accept our help and reform its ways and become respectable.......... Their hearts and minds must accept we lost theres no other way than accept the US, and join them........ War is ugly, civilians die, and trying to have clean wars just drag out the hostilties for all sides withno real conclusion. Nce the US leaves iraq the problem will likely return.......... Plus the US cant be the worlds cop, theres too many bad guys and not enough of us... Although this is a seperate issue But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
On Feb 21, 12:30*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 2/21/2010 6:04 AM, Jack Linthicum wrote: But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? Exile its leader from Tibet? No, that didn't work... I know...you convince them that sexual reproduction is a sin, and every time they want to screw, they should make a piece of furniture instead:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakers In around 100 years they will be almost all gone, and the collector's value of their furniture will go right through the roof, despite the fact that each member of the religion made enough to furnish a large hotel. Pat Better than the voiced alternative. One billion dead would drive up the cost of land, just for the burial. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
On 2/21/2010 4:00 AM, Jack Linthicum wrote:
Another county heard from http://www.phrases.org.uk/bulletin_b...sages/368.html The TR quote ("To put into words what is in their hearts and minds but not in their mouths.") only vaguely resembles the "got them by the balls" one. In fact, it sounds like something out of Homer's Iliad, or at least Fagles' translation of it. :-) I could certainly picture Senator Mendel Rivers coming up with something like that, as to me it has the stamp of the south on it. Alexander Haig just passed away, and he said one of the wittiest things I've ever heard. He was smoking a cigar at a party, and a reporter got a look at the company ID ring around it, and realized it was a Cuban brand. Reporter: "General! _You_ smoking a Cuban cigar?" Haig: "I prefer to think of it as burning Castro's crops." :-D Pat |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
wrote in message ... When we decimated the country we attacked the residents knew they lost and needed us desperately to survive. It's Afghanistan, they expect to lose, expect to be decimated, and expect their irregular tactics to triumph in the end, as they have done for the past 2,000 years. -- William Black I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Barbeques on fire by the chalets past the castle headland I watched the gift shops glitter in the darkness off the Newborough gate All these moments will be lost in time, like icecream on the beach Time for tea. |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
Jack Linthicum wrote:
{snip} But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? Ask the Spanish Inquisition they succeeded several times. Both in Europe and South America, including parts of the USA that used to be Mexico. Andrew Swallow |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
"Andrew Swallow" wrote in message news Jack Linthicum wrote: {snip} But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? Ask the Spanish Inquisition they succeeded several times. Both in Europe and South America, including parts of the USA that used to be Mexico. Andrew Swallow Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
On 2/21/2010 6:04 AM, Jack Linthicum wrote:
But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? Exile its leader from Tibet? No, that didn't work... I know...you convince them that sexual reproduction is a sin, and every time they want to screw, they should make a piece of furniture instead: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakers In around 100 years they will be almost all gone, and the collector's value of their furniture will go right through the roof, despite the fact that each member of the religion made enough to furnish a large hotel. Pat |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
On Feb 21, 12:02*pm, "Roger Conroy"
wrote: "Andrew Swallow" wrote in message news Jack Linthicum wrote: {snip} But isn't a country, it's a variation on a fundamental image of a religion. How do you "defeat" a religion? Ask the Spanish Inquisition they succeeded several times. Both in Europe and South America, including parts of the USA that used to be Mexico. Andrew Swallow Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Anyone aware that the Conversos outlasted the Inquistion? http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/.../Marranos.html |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Afghan Push Went Beyond Traditional Military Goals
William Black wrote:
wrote in message ... When we decimated the country we attacked the residents knew they lost and needed us desperately to survive. It's Afghanistan, they expect to lose, expect to be decimated, and expect their irregular tactics to triumph in the end, as they have done for the past 2,000 years. There's nothing special about Aghanistan. Much, if not most, of the world has pretty much done the same thing for thousands of years too. The rule of thumb is, if you get attacked and you lose, and there are many more of you than there are invaders, eventually you assimilate them, or often enough the invaders leave for other reasons. But since you retain your ethnic identity, you never actually really lost. There's this kind of notion that Afghanistan is some kind of unique place that has resisted invaders for several millennia. They are certainly not unique in this. The Afghanis could certainly be conquered in a much more fundamental way if we were taking about more than transitory military occupations. They are not immune to whole scale migrations any more than anyone else is. Except who in their right mind would want to migrate to Afghanistan? AHS |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Israeli Military Aircraft Company Tied To 9-11 | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 3 | May 24th 08 10:07 PM |
2007 Was Tied as Earth's Second-Warmest Year (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | January 17th 08 06:39 AM |
Dark Energy Tied to Human Origins | LenderBroker | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | July 13th 04 03:30 PM |
predictions of antineutrinos tied to gravity Veneziano's method | Igor | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 7th 03 01:21 PM |