A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Model Mechanics: A New Aether Theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 9th 05, 01:59 PM
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Model Mechanics: A New Aether Theory

The postulates of Model Mechanics are as follows:
1) The E-Matrix is a stationary and structured light-conducting medium. It
occupies all of pure space (pure void). It is comprised of very thin and
elastic E-Strings and these E-Strings are repulsive to each other. There is
an unknown compacting force that compresses these E-Strings together to form
the E-Matrix.
2) The S-Particle is the only truly fundamental particle exists in our
universe. The different orbiting motions of the S-Particles around the
E-String(s) give rise to all the visible and stable particles in our
universe.
3) All the processes of nature are the results of absolute motions of
S-Particles or S-Particle systems in the E-Matrix.
4) All the forces of nature are the results of the S-Particle or S-Particle
systems reacting to the distortions or waves in the E-Strings to which they
are confined. The distortions or waves in the E-Strings, in turn, are the
results of the absolute motions of the interacting S-Particles or S-Particle
systems in the E-Matrix.

These postulates eliminate all the infinity problems that plagued both GRT
and QM. It has the same mechanism for all the forces of nature and thus it
unites all the forces of nature. It gives an explanation why the force of
gravity is capable of acting at a distance. It explains the provisions of
the Uncertainty Principle. It explains the weird results of all quantum
experiments [3]. It eliminates the need for the undetectable force
messengers in QM. It eliminates the need for the hypothetical and undetected
Higgs particle. It explains the mass of a particle. It explains the charge
of a particle. It leads to the discovery of the CRE force, which, in turn
leads to a new theory of gravity called Doppler Theory of Gravity (DTG). It
leads to a new theory of relativity called Improved Relativity Theory (IRT).
IRT includes SRT as a subset. However, unlike SRT, the equations of IRT are
valid in all environments....including gravity. In short, Model Mechanics
gives us a unique way to achieve the elusive goal of unifying all of
physics.

The following link gives a complete description of Model Mechanics:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2005Unification.pdf

Enjoy,
Ken Seto



  #2  
Old June 9th 05, 03:42 PM
tadchem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Some people possess more than normal intelligence, and a corresponding
degree of ignorance, exacerbated by an unwillingness to spend the time
to learn what is already well-established knowledge (i.e. 'stupidity').

If permitted to continue unchecked, they might possibly stumble into
some venue in which they could become dangerous.

It pleases me to see that many waste their time and energies in futile
but harmless persuits such as developing 'alternatives' to theories
that work.

In the Name of Humanity, these people should be *encouraged* in their
useless and doomed endeavors, lest they take up another hobby such as
viral bioengineering or digital genetics where they could inadvertently
do great damage to many individuals and to the resources upon which we
all depend.

Let us keep them in their sandboxes.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

  #3  
Old June 9th 05, 05:02 PM
Gregory L. Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
tadchem wrote:
Some people possess more than normal intelligence, and a corresponding
degree of ignorance, exacerbated by an unwillingness to spend the time
to learn what is already well-established knowledge (i.e. 'stupidity').

If permitted to continue unchecked, they might possibly stumble into
some venue in which they could become dangerous.

It pleases me to see that many waste their time and energies in futile
but harmless persuits such as developing 'alternatives' to theories
that work.

In the Name of Humanity, these people should be *encouraged* in their
useless and doomed endeavors, lest they take up another hobby such as
viral bioengineering or digital genetics where they could inadvertently
do great damage to many individuals and to the resources upon which we
all depend.

Let us keep them in their sandboxes.


How many of those people are experimentalists? There's Orman, and
basically nobody else. Some don't even bother to research the
measurements that relate to their theories, but most concern themselves
with purely metaphysical ideas that don't intersect experiment at all.
E.g. what is the REAL explanation of the phenomena that relativity
correctly predicts but incorrectly explains?

What are the odds that they'd build a microbiology lab in their home?


--
"Outside the camp you shall have a place set aside to be used as a
latrine. You shall keep a trowel in your equipment and with it, when you
go outside to ease nature, you shall first dig a hole and afterward cover
up your excrement." -- Deuteronomy 23:13-14
  #4  
Old June 9th 05, 06:15 PM
tadchem
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Gregory L. Hansen wrote:

snip

"Outside the camp you shall have a place set aside to be used as a
latrine. You shall keep a trowel in your equipment and with it, when you
go outside to ease nature, you shall first dig a hole and afterward cover
up your excrement." -- Deuteronomy 23:13-14


Your rendition appears closest to the New Living Translation, but the
verses numbers are wrong - it is Deuteronomy 23:12-13.

http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...3-9146.html#12
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...6-8545.html#12
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...7-5413.html#13
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...1-8973.html#13

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA

  #5  
Old June 9th 05, 06:48 PM
Gregory L. Hansen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com,
tadchem wrote:


Gregory L. Hansen wrote:

snip

"Outside the camp you shall have a place set aside to be used as a
latrine. You shall keep a trowel in your equipment and with it, when you
go outside to ease nature, you shall first dig a hole and afterward cover
up your excrement." -- Deuteronomy 23:13-14


Your rendition appears closest to the New Living Translation, but the
verses numbers are wrong - it is Deuteronomy 23:12-13.

http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...3-9146.html#12
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...6-8545.html#12
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...7-5413.html#13
http://www.blueletterbible.org/tmp_d...1-8973.html#13


I was looking at a Catholic bible. I understand they have slightly
different numbers sometimes.

http://www.usccb.org/nab/bible/deute...teronomy23.htm


--
"The probability of anything happening is in inverse ratio to its
desirability." -- Gumperson's Law
  #6  
Old June 9th 05, 07:43 PM
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

kenseto wrote:

The postulates of Model Mechanics are as follows:
1) The E-Matrix is a stationary and structured light-conducting medium.

[snip crap]

Ignorant idiot.

Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
No aether

http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/mans/clane/
http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/7
No Lorentz violation

There is no aether to 10^(-15) relative BY EXPERIMENT.

Michelson-Morley experiments
Brillet-Hall experiments
Kennedy-Thorndike experiments
Hughes-Drever experiments
Ives-Stillwell experiments

Ignorant idiot.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
  #7  
Old June 9th 05, 07:49 PM
uucp
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

No aether

if no ether what phenomena who bounds c
and other stuff

please explain c

  #8  
Old June 9th 05, 10:02 PM
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ROFLOL....a typical reaction of an insecure runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR.

Ken Seto

"tadchem" wrote in message
oups.com...
Some people possess more than normal intelligence, and a corresponding
degree of ignorance, exacerbated by an unwillingness to spend the time
to learn what is already well-established knowledge (i.e. 'stupidity').

If permitted to continue unchecked, they might possibly stumble into
some venue in which they could become dangerous.

It pleases me to see that many waste their time and energies in futile
but harmless persuits such as developing 'alternatives' to theories
that work.

In the Name of Humanity, these people should be *encouraged* in their
useless and doomed endeavors, lest they take up another hobby such as
viral bioengineering or digital genetics where they could inadvertently
do great damage to many individuals and to the resources upon which we
all depend.

Let us keep them in their sandboxes.

Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA



  #9  
Old June 9th 05, 10:03 PM
kenseto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Uncle Al" wrote in message
...
kenseto wrote:

The postulates of Model Mechanics are as follows:
1) The E-Matrix is a stationary and structured light-conducting medium.

[snip crap]

Ignorant idiot.


ROFLOL....Hitler Al is an insecure runt of the SR experts.
Definition for a runt of the SR experts:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend
beyond what he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their **** like
gourmet puppy chow. An Asshole who will attack anybody who
disagrees with SR.

Ken Seto



  #10  
Old June 9th 05, 10:18 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article .com, "tadchem" writes:
Some people possess more than normal intelligence, and a corresponding
degree of ignorance, exacerbated by an unwillingness to spend the time
to learn what is already well-established knowledge (i.e. 'stupidity').

If permitted to continue unchecked, they might possibly stumble into
some venue in which they could become dangerous.

It pleases me to see that many waste their time and energies in futile
but harmless persuits such as developing 'alternatives' to theories
that work.

In the Name of Humanity, these people should be *encouraged* in their
useless and doomed endeavors, lest they take up another hobby such as
viral bioengineering or digital genetics where they could inadvertently
do great damage to many individuals and to the resources upon which we
all depend.

Let us keep them in their sandboxes.

Good point, very good point.

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
| chances are he is doing just the same"
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cosmic acceleration rediscovered greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 258 February 11th 05 01:21 PM
A model of the aether nightbat Misc 19 August 19th 04 09:52 PM
Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS [email protected] \(formerly\) Astronomy Misc 273 December 28th 03 10:42 PM
Neutrino Oscillations greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 59 October 10th 03 08:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.