A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Perihelion advance of the earth/moon system (the reality)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 25th 21, 03:48 AM posted to sci.astro
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Perihelion advance of the earth/moon system (the reality)

Perihelion advance of the earth/moon system (the reality)
---

I would normally offer a web based option, but my ability to access my
web pages and internet services generally has been severely diminished.
Why?? In a world so full of bull**** (the universally understood but
not yet in the dictionary word) I can only guess. I am listening
though.
---

Download the folder 'periadv' from Google Drive
https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...cs?usp=sharing
Unzip the downloaded folder into a directory of your choice. Run the
fbc.htm file. It's a worthwhile adventure on a dull day.
---

The advance rate of the earth-moon perihelion is shown in the following
image which was generated from a FreeBasic compiled Qbasic program. The advance is 180 degrees after 228 orbit cycles. **THIS WILL ALWAYS
BE THE CASE REGARDLESS OF WHICH PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE ONE CHOOSES TO USE.**

Setting the moon average orbit radius at 4e8 meters, with an orbit
speed of 900 m/sec at aphelion, gives an orbit eccentricity of .12
and an advance rate of .794 degrees per cycle.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1DDb...ew?usp=sharing

According to observation, the advance rate is a little more than 3
degrees per cycle. There is absolutely no way this can be explained by
currently accepted gravity theories. Newton couldn't do it. And
Einstein's contribution to the advance is of almost zero consequence
here, so it also fails.

Increasing orbit eccentricty doesn't help much either.
This image results from an eccentricity of .93
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IR5...ew?usp=sharing
The advance is still only 2.2 degrees per cycle.

The proper advance generated from the sun's influence is .794 degrees
per cycle. Adding my contribution of 2.217 degrees = 3.011 degrees per
orbit cycle. How much closer can it get?

One could re-write the program in whatever programming language one
desires. Running the program using Qbasic in DosBox is another option.

Or compile the program as an executable file using Freebasic.
(makexe.htm from the downloaded files)

-----

Max Keon
Ads
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Perihelion advance of the moon [email protected] Astronomy Misc 2 April 21st 21 10:00 AM
2 Body Orbits and the Perihelion Advance of Mercury. Max Keon[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 September 2nd 20 01:51 AM
OJ287 binary black hole system perihelion shifts [email protected] Astronomy Misc 12 May 15th 20 02:27 PM
Perihelion Advance of Mercury. [email protected] Astronomy Misc 25 November 18th 08 12:12 PM
The Advance of the Perihelion of Mercury Double-A[_2_] Misc 8 June 18th 08 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.