A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Basic Principles of Einstein-Free Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 23rd 21, 02:01 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Basic Principles of Einstein-Free Physics

Doppler effect (stationary light source, moving observer):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

Two obvious facts in the above scenario:

(A) The speed and the frequency of the light pulses vary proportionally for the observer.

(B) The wavelength (distance between light pulses) remains constant.

(A) and (B), generalized over all possible scenarios, in the presence or absence of gravity, will become the basic principles of resurrected, Einstein-free physics.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old April 23rd 21, 08:22 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Basic Principles of Einstein-Free Physics

The texts below unwittingly lay the foundation of future, Einstein-free physics. Speed and frequency of light vary proportionally, wavelength (speed/frequency) is constant, in accordance with the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

This constancy of the wavelength of light, generalized over all possible scenarios (both in presence and in absence of gravity), will become the fundamental axiom of the new physics:

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

Albert Einstein Institute: "You do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. [...] The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...te_dwarfs.html

"To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 2-17, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old April 23rd 21, 10:31 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Basic Principles of Einstein-Free Physics

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

Einstein's physics. Axiom: Constant speed of light. Consequence: Any frequency shift is caused by an inversely proportional wavelength shift. Obvious nonsense.

Einstein-free physics. Axiom: Constant wavelength of light. Consequence: Any frequency shift is caused by a proportional speed-of-light shift. At least in this case https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE both the axiom and the consequence are obviously confirmed.

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Physics: Constant Speed of Light. Einstein-Free Physics:Constant Wavelength of Light Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 August 10th 20 07:55 PM
Einstein's Physics Is Absurd. Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 24th 20 08:28 PM
The Difference Between Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 18th 20 12:55 AM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 1st 20 01:40 AM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 13th 19 10:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2021 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.