|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Ranging and Pioneer
"Oh No" wrote in message ... Thus spake Spud ... gr-qc/0104064 Many thanks. If I understand Anderson correctly it is merely an engineering constraint. With a (perhaps greatly) amplified signal it should be possible to reduce integration times to achieve correlation so that the signal can be returned without a substantial range delay. The problem was more fundamental. Reading between the lines, and from some personal correspondence, the rate of change of the carrier frequency was I believe limited in choice by the design of the exciter or correlator equipment. The narrow bandwidth required to get an acceptable SNR at the craft meant the minimum sweep rate was too fast and the craft lost lock on the uplink. Increased gain at the craft wouldn't help, only more transmit power, but that was in the 100's of kW already and being routed through their largest (70m) dishes. Anyway that is the basis on which I am working at the moment. But I am not an engineer, and I was hoping this might be confirmed. My arguments would take quite a different form if this was a fundamental constraint. It was purely an equipment limitation, possibly exacerbated by radiation damage during the Jupiter flyby though that is my speculation. BTW, I am a digital and systems engineer in a company working significantly in HF comms. George |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |
Pioneer 10 test of light speed | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 48 | February 18th 05 04:40 AM |
pioneer 10 acceleration | Nodem Info. Sys. | Research | 19 | June 4th 04 10:15 AM |
NASA Test of Light Speed Extrapolation | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 26 | February 12th 04 02:29 PM |