|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
BG Yes man walked on the moon. It was no hollywood movie with special
effects. Apollo with its Saturn V rocket and great engineering had all the right stuff. Nixon was at Ca Mafia. head man Walter Annenbergs estate in Palm Springs and they put the shuttle program together. We see the results 40 years later. Bert |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
On Oct 9, 9:33*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. *They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. *BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. *Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. *Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. *The BB, if visible, would be in real time.. Just another paradox to consider: *If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. *Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. *If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. *Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. *If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. *You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. *The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
On Oct 10, 3:42*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. *It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. *That is the oldest light we can see. *The best we can do is to analyse that. *We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) *We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright.. It wasn't. The view we see is from 380,000 years later. The view before that was more like the view you might see if you were in the center of the Sun! Double-A |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 3:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright. It wasn't. The view we see is from 380,000 years later. The view before that was more like the view you might see if you were in the center of the Sun! ***If the Big Bang were as bright as being in the center of the Sun, then surely if we could see 380,000 years after the Big Bang, we could also look backward in time just a little bit more and see the big inferno you speak of itself. ***Maybe the Hubbel just isn't powerful enough, and we will have to build a really big one on the Moon to see it. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
On Oct 10, 5:28*pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote:
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 3:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message .... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright. It wasn't. *The view we see is from 380,000 years later. *The view before that was more like the view you might see if you were in the center of the Sun! ***If the Big Bang were as bright as being in the center of the Sun, then surely if we could see 380,000 years after the Big Bang, we could also look backward in time just a little bit more and see the big inferno you speak of itself. ***Maybe the Hubbel just isn't powerful enough, and we will have to build a really big one on the Moon to see it. You are missing the point. You talk as if we could be outside the universe and see it start out as a point of light. But we are trapped inside of the universe and can't get out! As we look back trough time, our perspective is shrinking along with the universe. Anything we can see back then is from inside the universe, no matter how small the universe was at that time. We never get a perspective from outside it where we can watch it explode. Light coming from all directions is all we could have seen back then, and so the CMBR coming from all directions is all we can see today. Double-A |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 5:28 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 3:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message .... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright. It wasn't. The view we see is from 380,000 years later. The view before that was more like the view you might see if you were in the center of the Sun! ***If the Big Bang were as bright as being in the center of the Sun, then surely if we could see 380,000 years after the Big Bang, we could also look backward in time just a little bit more and see the big inferno you speak of itself. ***Maybe the Hubbel just isn't powerful enough, and we will have to build a really big one on the Moon to see it. You are missing the point. You talk as if we could be outside the universe and see it start out as a point of light. But we are trapped inside of the universe and can't get out! As we look back trough time, our perspective is shrinking along with the universe. Anything we can see back then is from inside the universe, no matter how small the universe was at that time. We never get a perspective from outside it where we can watch it explode. Light coming from all directions is all we could have seen back then, and so the CMBR coming from all directions is all we can see today. Double-A ~~~~~~~~~~~ Check-out CTMU: http://www.ctmu.org/ -- John C. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
"Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 5:28 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 10, 3:42 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Double-A" wrote in message ... On Oct 9, 9:33 pm, "Mark Earnest" wrote: "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ... "Nightcrawler" wrote in message ... "Mark Earnest" wrote in message ernetamerica... But the galaxies are not at all in the locations that we currently see them in. They are where they were billions of years ago, and if we are talking billions of years ago, we finally are talking about seeing the Big Bang if the galaxies are far enough away. It is true that we are seeing them from billions of years ago, but we are still seeing them "after" the BB. BB first, primordial, cosmic soup second. Then we get into star and galaxy formation. Meanwhile, space is still expanding and the BB is already over. On the other hand, maybe if you look far enough away, you can see forever. Just a poetic way of putting it. Yes, a dreamers gaze upon the aether of times gone by. If we look far enough away, the Big Bang will still be there, apparently frozen in time. Not a chance. Though it would be neat if we could get some high speed stop-action on the event. The BB, if visible, would be in real time. Just another paradox to consider: If we could see the BB then we wouldn't exist yet. Any and all effects of the BB are way past us, and truth be told, we were always behind it and will never catch up to it. If we could see a BB, now, then that would be a creation of another, new universe inside of our own existing universe. Think of the BB as a nuclear blast. Once it starts there is no way to view it if you are part of it. If you are part of it, you don't exist to view it, yet. We see all kinds of light in the universe that already happened. Yes, but not twice. You may only see the original once, everything else is a reflection. The only way to see the BB would be to exist before it occurred. I believe it will happen. Beliefs are easy, now, aren't they? Truths on the other hand... If you could see fifty billion light years away, and the universe is only about ten billion years old...there is no way that you could miss the grand explosion. In fact, you could see beyond the beginning of the universe... ...to whatever mysterious goings on happened before the universe even existed. All this is straining my brain a little, though... Maybe that's the way the gods intended it. I know what you are saying, you are saying that I am getting the cart before the horse. Just realize: when you look through a powerful telescope, you are actually traveling through time. And the fictional artists well know, when you travel through time, strange things happen. The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is the glow from the universe at the time it became transparent. It has red-shifted all the way down to radio waves as the universe has expanded. That is the oldest light we can see. The best we can do is to analyse that. We can calculate, for instance, our velocity relative to the CMBR rest state (the state in which there is no relative red or blue shift of the CMBR in any direction.) We have a motion of somewhere around 400 miles per second relative to the CMBR rest frame. Double-A **How could the most brilliant flash of light of all time possibly be trasparent? If all energy came from this, it must have been pretty bright. It wasn't. The view we see is from 380,000 years later. The view before that was more like the view you might see if you were in the center of the Sun! ***If the Big Bang were as bright as being in the center of the Sun, then surely if we could see 380,000 years after the Big Bang, we could also look backward in time just a little bit more and see the big inferno you speak of itself. ***Maybe the Hubbel just isn't powerful enough, and we will have to build a really big one on the Moon to see it. You are missing the point. You talk as if we could be outside the universe and see it start out as a point of light. But we are trapped inside of the universe and can't get out! As we look back trough time, our perspective is shrinking along with the universe. Anything we can see back then is from inside the universe, no matter how small the universe was at that time. We never get a perspective from outside it where we can watch it explode. Light coming from all directions is all we could have seen back then, and so the CMBR coming from all directions is all we can see today. Double-A **You are right that we are not outside of the universe now. But we are outside the universe of 11.315 billion years ago. We are beyond it. Well beyond it. And we can see it from the outside. When we look at objects billions of light years away we are time travelers for a little while, even if it is merely as photographs of such objects. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Light is much faster than you think
On Oct 10, 8:33*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
BG *Yes man walked on the moon. It was no hollywood movie with special effects. Apollo with its Saturn V rocket and great engineering had all the right stuff. Nixon was at Ca Mafia. head man Walter Annenbergs estate in Palm Springs and they put the shuttle program together. We see the results 40 years later. Bert So far we see extremely fuzzy pixels that any 5th grader could just as easily PhotoShop, and otherwise we have nothing objective. Even those monochrome LROC images were substantially delayed from time of their being obtained, and the other 99.9% of the LRO mission science is still unusually slow or being kept as unavailable. Nothing has changed about Kodak film, and our Selene/moon is still nearly as dark as coal, but otherwise mineral saturated and UV reactive. So, where the other 99.9% of our public funded science? ~ BG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Faster than LIGHT! | Mack Fan | Astronomy Misc | 7 | February 13th 08 10:26 PM |
Faster than LIGHT | Mack Fan | Astronomy Misc | 2 | February 7th 08 11:26 PM |
Light Travels Backward and Faster than Light | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | February 26th 07 02:56 PM |
Light Travels Backward and Faster than Light | Raving Loonie | Misc | 10 | June 22nd 06 07:50 AM |
Faster than light? Huh. | Alf P. Steinbach | Research | 4 | May 17th 04 08:31 PM |