A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First time telechubbies nervous rodent arsespelunking up ****



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 4th 07, 04:42 AM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.astro.amateur,soc.penpals,alt.personals.gay
Shitetard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default First time telechubbies nervous rodent arsespelunking up ****



















In article ,
Llanzlan Gayman waxed his telescope handily:
"Mike Jones" wrote in
:

First time buyer here. Is the Meade 70AZ-ADR Telescope a good choice
for the first time buyer? I would of course have to purchase some
additional eye pieces, but as far as quality and features go, would this
be a good choice? Also, what additional eye pieces would be
recommended?

I am not looking to join clubs, etc, just some occasioal use - for that
reason, I'm not looking to break the bank - yet! Looking to spend
under $300 to get started. If this Meade is not recommended, what would
you guys (and girls) recommend for my first telescope?

Thanks!


The scope itself might be ok but if this one is supported by a tripod then
at that price point the tripod is likely to be shakey. Such a way of
mounting a scope becomes frustrating with a scope of even high quality. The
problem is that solid steady tripod (which is a must) and cheap don't mix.
At the lower price end a simple dobsonian style mount is likely to give
better results. Check out the Dobsonians available from Orion. This 6" one
appears to be within you budget and its' 150mm aperture will blow away the
70mm Meade. The only reason I would get the Meade would be for terrestial
use as the Dobsonians are useless for that.

http://www.telechubbies.com/buggerin...?itemID=238462
&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=4&iSubCat=9&iProductID =PyrexGerbilFelchingTube

Try reading ****etard's nancy buggers FAQ before sodomizing Dennis Bishop's arsehole:

http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn

Klazmon the Sod.


****etard's telechubbies fan club link is the fawking dog's ********

i have a wagon with oil i oil my wagon i need my tard
i am pining for tard come back tard the arsetro buggers will pony up for
a ten bob if you swallow it will be like old times



























the spammertard of rosatard and spelling bee champion | http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn


  #2  
Old September 4th 07, 02:45 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.astro.amateur,soc.penpals,alt.personals.gay
Hoots
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 238
Default First time telechubbies nervous rodent arsespelunking up****

****etard wrote:
In article ,
Llanzlan Gayman waxed his telescope handily:
"Mike Jones" wrote in
:

First time buyer here. Is the Meade 70AZ-ADR Telescope a good choice
for the first time buyer? I would of course have to purchase some
additional eye pieces, but as far as quality and features go, would this
be a good choice? Also, what additional eye pieces would be
recommended?

I am not looking to join clubs, etc, just some occasioal use - for that
reason, I'm not looking to break the bank - yet! Looking to spend
under $300 to get started. If this Meade is not recommended, what would
you guys (and girls) recommend for my first telescope?

Thanks!

The scope itself might be ok but if this one is supported by a tripod then
at that price point the tripod is likely to be shakey. Such a way of
mounting a scope becomes frustrating with a scope of even high quality. The
problem is that solid steady tripod (which is a must) and cheap don't mix.
At the lower price end a simple dobsonian style mount is likely to give
better results. Check out the Dobsonians available from Orion. This 6" one
appears to be within you budget and its' 150mm aperture will blow away the
70mm Meade. The only reason I would get the Meade would be for terrestial
use as the Dobsonians are useless for that.

http://www.telechubbies.com/buggerin...?itemID=238462
&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=4&iSubCat=9&iProductID= PyrexGerbilFelchingTube

Try reading ****etard's nancy buggers FAQ before sodomizing Dennis Bishop's arsehole:

http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn

Klazmon the Sod.


****etard's telechubbies fan club link is the fawking dog's ********

i have a wagon with oil i oil my wagon i need my tard
i am pining for tard come back tard the arsetro buggers will pony up for
a ten bob if you swallow it will be like old times



























the spammertard of rosatard and spelling bee champion | http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn



squeak squeak
  #3  
Old September 4th 07, 08:53 PM posted to alt.astronomy,sci.astro.amateur,soc.penpals,alt.personals.gay
William[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default First time telechubbies nervous rodent arsespelunking up ****

On 4 Sep, 14:45, Hoots wrote:
****etard wrote:
In article ,
Llanzlan Gayman waxed his telescope handily:
"Mike Jones" wrote in
:


First time buyer here. Is the Meade 70AZ-ADR Telescope a good choice
for the first time buyer? I would of course have to purchase some
additional eye pieces, but as far as quality and features go, would this
be a good choice? Also, what additional eye pieces would be
recommended?


I am not looking to join clubs, etc, just some occasioal use - for that
reason, I'm not looking to break the bank - yet! Looking to spend
under $300 to get started. If this Meade is not recommended, what would
you guys (and girls) recommend for my first telescope?


Thanks!


The scope itself might be ok but if this one is supported by a tripod then
at that price point the tripod is likely to be shakey. Such a way of
mounting a scope becomes frustrating with a scope of even high quality. The
problem is that solid steady tripod (which is a must) and cheap don't mix.
At the lower price end a simple dobsonian style mount is likely to give
better results. Check out the Dobsonians available from Orion. This 6" one
appears to be within you budget and its' 150mm aperture will blow away the
70mm Meade. The only reason I would get the Meade would be for terrestial
use as the Dobsonians are useless for that.


http://www.telechubbies.com/buggerin...n.jizz?itemID=...
&itemType=PRODUCT&iMainCat=4&iSubCat=9&iProductID= PyrexGerbilFelchingTube


Try reading ****etard's nancy buggers FAQ before sodomizing Dennis Bishop's arsehole:


http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn


Klazmon the Sod.


****etard's telechubbies fan club link is the fawking dog's ********


i have a wagon with oil i oil my wagon i need my tard
i am pining for tard come back tard the arsetro buggers will pony up for
a ten bob if you swallow it will be like old times


the spammertard of rosatard and spelling bee champion |http://tinyurl.com/ypt5fn


squeak squeak- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Is that a mouse you are hiding or a rusty barn door ?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
He may all right trade surrounding and fears our nervous, western exams in view of a expedition. A. B. Mohmed Amateur Astronomy 0 August 13th 07 12:14 PM
It's About Time: The Concept of Time, Cosmology and the Latest Theory about Time. physics_Made_Easy Astronomy Misc 0 May 20th 07 01:43 AM
No shit??? bob&carole Misc 0 January 27th 07 04:09 PM
A GLOBAL DIGITAL NERVOUS SYSTEM szaki Amateur Astronomy 8 September 10th 05 05:47 AM
personally nervous about Dubya's "back to moon" call Mike Flugennock History 12 January 19th 04 08:41 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.