A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Two Axiomatizations Leading to Einstein's Relativity andEinstein-Free Physics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 8th 20, 11:53 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Two Axiomatizations Leading to Einstein's Relativity andEinstein-Free Physics

The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

allows two axiomatizations:

Axiom 1 (Einstein 1905): The speed of light is constant.

Axiom 2: The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter).

Axiom 1 killed fundamental physics (converted it into an insane ideology). Axiom 2 will resurrect it (hopefully).

It is easy to show that the wavelength of light remains constant

(A) when the observer starts moving towards the emitter.

(B) when the emitter starts moving towards the observer.

(C) when light falls in a gravitational field.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 8th 20, 03:39 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Two Axiomatizations Leading to Einstein's Relativity andEinstein-Free Physics

The texts below suggest that, if the speed of light is variable (it is!), fundamental physics, entirely predicated on Einstein's constant-speed-of-light falsehood, has died long ago (nowadays exists as a farce/ideology). The only relevant task in this field of science is RESURRECTION.

"If there's one thing every schoolboy knows about Einstein and his theory of relativity, it is that the speed of light in vacuum is constant. No matter what the circumstances, light in vacuum travels at the same speed... The speed of light is the very keystone of physics, the seemingly sure foundation upon which every modern cosmological theory is built, the yardstick by which everything in the universe is measured. [...] The only aspect of the universe that didn't change was the speed of light. And ever since, the constancy of the speed of light has been woven into the very fabric of physics, into the way physics equations are written, even into the notation used. Nowadays, to "vary" the speed of light is not even a swear word: It is simply not present in the vocabulary of physics." https://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-S.../dp/0738205257

"He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing! It is like proposing a language without vowels." http://www.thegreatdebate.org.uk/VSLRevPrnt.html

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Physics Is Absurd. Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 24th 20 08:28 PM
The Difference Between Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 18th 20 12:55 AM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 0 July 1st 20 01:40 AM
Einstein's Physics and Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 15th 20 06:08 PM
Towards Einstein-Free Physics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 13th 19 10:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.