A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Physics without Einstein's Absurdities



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 5th 20, 10:36 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Physics without Einstein's Absurdities

Doppler frequency shift:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

Two alternative assumptions:

Assumption 1 (Einstein's 1905 special relativity): The speed of the light pulses relative to the moving observer is constant. This implies that the distance between subsequent light pulses decreases in front of the moving observer - that is the reason why he measures an increased frequency. All other implications of Einstein's 1905 assumption are equally absurd.

Assumption 2 (future, Einstein-free physics): The distance between subsequent light pulses is constant (obviously). This implies that the frequency shift is caused by a proportional speed-of-light shift.

The fundamental law of future, Einstein-free physics:

Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 5th 20, 10:16 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Physics without Einstein's Absurdities

If judged by their speed alone, photons are Newtonian particles. The speed of light VARIES, both in the presence and in the absence of gravity, just as does the speed of ordinary projectiles (e.g. bullets). That is, the speed of light is c' = c±v in the absence of gravity, and the acceleration of falling photons near the surface of Earth is g = 9.8 m/s^2:

"Emission theory, also called Emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

"To see why a deflection of light would be expected, consider Figure 2-17, which shows a beam of light entering an accelerating compartment. Successive positions of the compartment are shown at equal time intervals. Because the compartment is accelerating, the distance it moves in each time interval increases with time. The path of the beam of light, as observed from inside the compartment, is therefore a parabola. But according to the equivalence principle, there is no way to distinguish between an accelerating compartment and one with uniform velocity in a uniform gravitational field. We conclude, therefore, that A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf

The following biconditional (see definition he https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_biconditional) is valid:

The speed of light is variable as per Newton

if and only if

the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter.

The consequent, "the wavelength of light is constant for a given emitter", will become the fundamental axiom of resurrected, Einstein-free physics. Important corollaries of the fundamental axiom:

Corollary 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Corollary 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v, as per Newton's theory.

Corollary 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes.

Corollary 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Corollary 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is static, not expanding.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics sorin Space Station 2 October 20th 11 02:49 AM
Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics sorin Space Science Misc 0 September 7th 11 03:52 PM
Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics sorin Policy 2 September 6th 11 05:27 AM
Cometary motion and absurdities of modern physics sorin History 0 September 5th 11 04:26 PM
GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN'S ABSURDITIES Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 8 April 26th 11 11:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.