GLOBAL WARMING

A view from the True Geology
**********************************

Regarding a recent article in Courrier Mail on Equinox day
Here is copy of my comments sent to the Editor

AUSTRALIA FACING WORST FIRE SEASON',


Sirs,

One important aspect of the global warming is not considered and cannot
be considered in light of present fraudulent & misleading Geology
theories, implying indeed a stability of Earth upon present orbit
since alleged creation there. ( Incidentally there is a complete
consensus between Sectarians & Big Bang Creationists on that particular
point)

Well, it is not so and the direct consequences of the global warming
are an irreversible drift on the Ecliptic generating on the one hand an
increase in the De Coriolis forces with consequences of higher vortex
speed of tornadoes & cyclones ( to reach soon 400 km/h); and on the
other hand a irremediable loss of air in outer atmosphere, which loss
the alchemy of rocks into water is unable to compensate ... with then
the lower pressure of fresh water in aquifers, its depletion and the
invasion of seas under continents.

All such aspects of the whole Geology problem cannot be even considered
by present Universities brain-washed alleged scientists since implying
firstly an approach based on the UPL ( Universal Pressure Law) corner
stone indeed of the True Geology and secondly a synthesis approach
which is complete opposition to the ultra specialisation of
Universities, conducting indeed the mind formatted & programmed
alleged scientists to tunnel vision and painfully narrow mindedness.

As a final comment, it goes without saying that concerning both Mankind
& Earth past, that accepted theories in Geology are both painfully
infantile & misleading indeed. There was never indeed any Glaciations
nor Glacial Ages and the alleged proofs of it presented by blinded
fools are just the proofs of direct application of the laws of Physics
of fluid applied upon etero-sedimentations, Mountain building in a
matter of hours & coherent indeed with the UPL, a time column which
must be referenced to the different positions of Earth upon Ecliptic
since birth from Mother star & its consecutive drift etc Incidentally
the alleged evolution proposed by failed medical student Darwin is in
fact a permanent adaptation to reduced Cosmic pressure environnement...

In matter pertaining to real science, one should remember that
Simplicity is the key to Verity ...and in my view the drought &
bushfires are the cosnequences of ignorance & comptempt for Nature
laws. In this regard present fire season as I see it, could well
infringe into city and cut wide swathes of destruction into Perth,
Melbourne or Sydney.

Yours faithfully


Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464

Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm

"sir.jpturcaud" wrote in message
ups.com

In matter pertaining to real science, one should remember that
Simplicity is the key to Verity ...and in my view the drought &
bushfires are the cosnequences of ignorance & comptempt for Nature
laws. In this regard present fire season as I see it, could well
infringe into city and cut wide swathes of destruction into Perth,
Melbourne or Sydney.

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464

Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm

As per usual, you are being directly correct, that man's disregard for
our environment is multi-fold at nailing our own butts to the cross.
However, Earth has also been getting mooned by a great deal of
geophysical interaction, and even by way of a little spare IR/FIR
energy, that which simply didn't exist prior to the last ice age.

Earth w/o moon, w/o moon god and with less magnetosphe

Firstly, I'd have to agree with many that Earth is not only quite a rare
but a rather damn lucky planet, especially since the gods of 'dumb luck
happenstance' gave us such a nifty moon (perhaps having also contributed
Venus from Sirius), hosting the right amount of salty ice and
representing just enough mascon/tidal energy to gradually thaw Earth
once and for all out from those deep cycles of having been so
extensively sub-frozen to death.

However, making a go of it without such a moon seems somewhat worse off
than merely remaining as extra cold and testy, whereas I'm thinking our
Earth would have remained extensively ice covered to nearly the 30
degree mark, of winters being absolutely horrific and of unbroken
sea-ice due to having so much less tidal differentials, other than a
slight solar tidal influence that simply wouldn't have represented all
that much.

Even though our global warming avenger "Roger Coppock" that's up against
the likes of most others as having been the typical all-knowing Usenet
naysayers of denial being in denial, whereas our Roger may seem a little
dumbfounded about the arrival of our somewhat salty and most likely icy
proto-moon of perhaps as great as 4000 km worth, that may have been
originally situated somewhat Sedna like, and simply affected by some
other impacting arrivals or greater mascon encounter as having a
sufficient influence. This external influence would have caused the
orbital diversion that brought us together, such as via the Sirius
star/solar system which I believe gets visited by our solar system
roughly every 105,000 years (more frequently in the distent past).
After all, Sedna itself gets to within 76 AU as is, and as such it would
not take all that much of an impact in order to cause that icy orb to
head directly our way, whereas if it were otherwise being dragged along
and/or intentionally deployed by an even greater mascon (such as Venus)
is only so much better yet.

Obviously something if not several extremely large items had impacted
our once upon a time icy moon, and quite possibly there's at least one
such impact that may have left it's mark in Earth as perhaps
representing the arctic ocean basin, as our arriving moon delivered a
glancing sucker punch of a blow to our extensively icy world.

All that Henry Kroll and myself can say with any reasonable certainty is
that our moon wasn't with us prior to 10,500 BC. However, I'd be very
interested to narrow that down to a specific decade or even a century,
whereas if Earth had been impacted by the arrival of such an icy moon,
chances are that most of the early human intelligent life upon Earth
went as deep as possible into hiding, as I would have, and I'd suppose
that the climate of Earth would have remained as somewhat nasty and
clouded over for a few centuries thereafter, which might further explain
as to why it took so long before that moon of ours to became noticed for
what it was.

Come to think (just a little further outside the box), our magnetosphere
might not have been nearly as extensive until after that Earth/moon
encounter. We've certainly been losing our magnetosphere potency by a
good .05%/yr, which might actually help us to establish the initial
timeline of the big event, of exactly when that moon of our impacted us.
-

Our moon is geophysically via mascon/tidal friction warming Earth rather
nicely as of the last ice age. As to what exact extent these
gravitational forces of such mascon induced tidal currents above and
below the surface are being converted into thermal energy may remain a
little fuzzy, but never the less it's an ongoing global warming factor
of such fuzzy logic that's telling us what's perfectly real and
happening to us, that's well above and beyond the ongoing impact of
modern humanity that has been clearly adding further trauma to our
environment.

Up until this last ice age, Earth's environment simply didn't have to
contend with that nearby moon of ours as of prior to 10,500 BC, just
that of our 100,000 and some odd year orbit of Sirius. If there were a
moon prior to 10,500 BC, as such it would have been included within many
of the artistic renderings of those tens of centuries of talented
artistic and otherwise serious records of those ice age and prior times
when humans had existed, and were otherwise good at depicting all that
was important to their survival. Some other research placed the
earliest depictions of a moon as late as 2000 BC, and for some odd
reason in never became a god moon.

Here's my two ballpark estimates of mascon/tidal warming that's roughly
between 0.01% and 0.1% of the 2e20 J / 9.80665 = 2.0395e19 kgf. It
could be a little greater, but it most certainly isn't anything much
less than the 0.01% mark.

0.1% of the associated 2e20 Joules = 390 w/m2 (plus whatever secondary
IR/FIR)

0.01% of the associated 2e20 Joules = 39 w/m2 (plus whatever secondary
IR/FIR)

Total change in greenhouse forcing from 1985 to 2004, we get 9.35 w/m2.


http://www.worldclimatereport.com/in...under-the-sun/

Current Man-made Greenhouse Forcing to be 2.4 - 4.3 W/m2, Compared with
7.5 - 10 W/m2 Needed for Change of Seasons


http://www.globalwarming.net/index.p...62&Itemi d=27

Of course the really big guns of G8 remain in total denial, other than
having insisted it's all the fault of Muslims. There's lots of other
data that's nicely compiled by wikipedia.org, such as the 11 year solar
cycle that's worth +/- 0.05% or possibly at most +/- 0.1% of solar
irradiance, which pretty much eliminates that source of being the
problem. Whereas the global dimming via soot and particle factors may
be the ultimate culprit that diminishes our global albedo to a
sufficient extent that can be directly measured from space on a year by
year basis, and best yet as measured from our moon's L1 or alternately
via ACE that's halo parked in Earth's L1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

Therefore, on behalf of global warming, I'm giving humanity as little
credit as having a 10% responsibility, and that nasty moon of ours gets
the other 90% which only seems most likely, especially since the energy
cycle of having made warm waters to sub-frozen ice and then ice back
into warm water is so freaking horrific, especially if we're taking the
km3 volumes of said ice and frozen tundra into account.

At the very most I'd be giving humanity 25% responsibility for this
ongoing global warming fiasco, although either way of being 25% or as
little as 10% is still entirely worth our doing something about, such as
cutting that artificial impact in half seems perfectly doable, and as
such it's way more than beneficial in so many other positive ways, other
than moderating our fair share of this never ending cycle of global
warming via human pollution and arrogance. That is unless you're
perfectly good with your next 'Happy Meal' being a McJellyfish sandwich,
or perhaps biofuel via farmed jellyfish could actually work.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Brad Guth a écrit :

"sir.jpturcaud" wrote in message
ups.com

In matter pertaining to real science, one should remember that
Simplicity is the key to Verity ...and in my view the drought &
bushfires are the cosnequences of ignorance & comptempt for Nature
laws. In this regard present fire season as I see it, could well
infringe into city and cut wide swathes of destruction into Perth,
Melbourne or Sydney.

Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist & Offshore Consultant
Mobile +33 650 171 464

Australia Mining Pioneer
Founder of the True Geology
http://www.tnet.com.au/~warrigal/grule.html
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/tel/index.html
http://members.iimetro.com.au/~hubbca/turcaud.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s28534.htm

As per usual, you are being directly correct, that man's disregard for
our environment is multi-fold at nailing our own butts to the cross.
However, Earth has also been getting mooned by a great deal of
geophysical interaction, and even by way of a little spare IR/FIR
energy, that which simply didn't exist prior to the last ice age.

Earth w/o moon, w/o moon god and with less magnetosphe

Firstly, I'd have to agree with many that Earth is not only quite a rare
but a rather damn lucky planet, especially since the gods of 'dumb luck
happenstance' gave us such a nifty moon (perhaps having also contributed
Venus from Sirius), hosting the right amount of salty ice and
representing just enough mascon/tidal energy to gradually thaw Earth
once and for all out from those deep cycles of having been so
extensively sub-frozen to death.

However, making a go of it without such a moon seems somewhat worse off
than merely remaining as extra cold and testy, whereas I'm thinking our
Earth would have remained extensively ice covered to nearly the 30
degree mark, of winters being absolutely horrific and of unbroken
sea-ice due to having so much less tidal differentials, other than a
slight solar tidal influence that simply wouldn't have represented all
that much.

Even though our global warming avenger "Roger Coppock" that's up against
the likes of most others as having been the typical all-knowing Usenet
naysayers of denial being in denial, whereas our Roger may seem a little
dumbfounded about the arrival of our somewhat salty and most likely icy
proto-moon of perhaps as great as 4000 km worth, that may have been
originally situated somewhat Sedna like, and simply affected by some
other impacting arrivals or greater mascon encounter as having a
sufficient influence. This external influence would have caused the
orbital diversion that brought us together, such as via the Sirius
star/solar system which I believe gets visited by our solar system
roughly every 105,000 years (more frequently in the distent past).
After all, Sedna itself gets to within 76 AU as is, and as such it would
not take all that much of an impact in order to cause that icy orb to
head directly our way, whereas if it were otherwise being dragged along
and/or intentionally deployed by an even greater mascon (such as Venus)
is only so much better yet.

Obviously something if not several extremely large items had impacted
our once upon a time icy moon, and quite possibly there's at least one
such impact that may have left it's mark in Earth as perhaps
representing the arctic ocean basin, as our arriving moon delivered a
glancing sucker punch of a blow to our extensively icy world.

All that Henry Kroll and myself can say with any reasonable certainty is
that our moon wasn't with us prior to 10,500 BC. However, I'd be very
interested to narrow that down to a specific decade or even a century,
whereas if Earth had been impacted by the arrival of such an icy moon,
chances are that most of the early human intelligent life upon Earth
went as deep as possible into hiding, as I would have, and I'd suppose
that the climate of Earth would have remained as somewhat nasty and
clouded over for a few centuries thereafter, which might further explain
as to why it took so long before that moon of ours to became noticed for
what it was.

Come to think (just a little further outside the box), our magnetosphere
might not have been nearly as extensive until after that Earth/moon
encounter. We've certainly been losing our magnetosphere potency by a
good .05%/yr, which might actually help us to establish the initial
timeline of the big event, of exactly when that moon of our impacted us.
-

Our moon is geophysically via mascon/tidal friction warming Earth rather
nicely as of the last ice age. As to what exact extent these
gravitational forces of such mascon induced tidal currents above and
below the surface are being converted into thermal energy may remain a
little fuzzy, but never the less it's an ongoing global warming factor
of such fuzzy logic that's telling us what's perfectly real and
happening to us, that's well above and beyond the ongoing impact of
modern humanity that has been clearly adding further trauma to our
environment.

Up until this last ice age, Earth's environment simply didn't have to
contend with that nearby moon of ours as of prior to 10,500 BC, just
that of our 100,000 and some odd year orbit of Sirius. If there were a
moon prior to 10,500 BC, as such it would have been included within many
of the artistic renderings of those tens of centuries of talented
artistic and otherwise serious records of those ice age and prior times
when humans had existed, and were otherwise good at depicting all that
was important to their survival. Some other research placed the
earliest depictions of a moon as late as 2000 BC, and for some odd
reason in never became a god moon.

Here's my two ballpark estimates of mascon/tidal warming that's roughly
between 0.01% and 0.1% of the 2e20 J / 9.80665 = 2.0395e19 kgf. It
could be a little greater, but it most certainly isn't anything much
less than the 0.01% mark.

0.1% of the associated 2e20 Joules = 390 w/m2 (plus whatever secondary
IR/FIR)

0.01% of the associated 2e20 Joules = 39 w/m2 (plus whatever secondary
IR/FIR)

Total change in greenhouse forcing from 1985 to 2004, we get 9.35 w/m2.


http://www.worldclimatereport.com/in...under-the-sun/

Current Man-made Greenhouse Forcing to be 2.4 - 4.3 W/m2, Compared with
7.5 - 10 W/m2 Needed for Change of Seasons


http://www.globalwarming.net/index.p...62&Itemi d=27

Of course the really big guns of G8 remain in total denial, other than
having insisted it's all the fault of Muslims. There's lots of other
data that's nicely compiled by wikipedia.org, such as the 11 year solar
cycle that's worth +/- 0.05% or possibly at most +/- 0.1% of solar
irradiance, which pretty much eliminates that source of being the
problem. Whereas the global dimming via soot and particle factors may
be the ultimate culprit that diminishes our global albedo to a
sufficient extent that can be directly measured from space on a year by
year basis, and best yet as measured from our moon's L1 or alternately
via ACE that's halo parked in Earth's L1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming

Therefore, on behalf of global warming, I'm giving humanity as little
credit as having a 10% responsibility, and that nasty moon of ours gets
the other 90% which only seems most likely, especially since the energy
cycle of having made warm waters to sub-frozen ice and then ice back
into warm water is so freaking horrific, especially if we're taking the
km3 volumes of said ice and frozen tundra into account.

At the very most I'd be giving humanity 25% responsibility for this
ongoing global warming fiasco, although either way of being 25% or as
little as 10% is still entirely worth our doing something about, such as
cutting that artificial impact in half seems perfectly doable, and as
such it's way more than beneficial in so many other positive ways, other
than moderating our fair share of this never ending cycle of global
warming via human pollution and arrogance. That is unless you're
perfectly good with your next 'Happy Meal' being a McJellyfish sandwich,
or perhaps biofuel via farmed jellyfish could actually work.
-
Brad Guth

Dear Brad,

Thanks for your reply re the Earth - Moon collision. That awareness is
somewhat so extraordinary that it should be noted & publicly praised.
That's a good step forward on the road to True Geology indeed !
What's lacking to your background to make sence of it all, is an
accointance to the foundation stone of the True Geology which is the
UPL or Universal Pressure Law.

You would understand then where the last moon impacting took place upon
Earth and what were the awful consequences of it !!! ( incidently this
explain why nearly no dust were found upon the Moon in its exploration
)
Any idea ?
By the way you are not far off regarding the date of that Moon impact
since it is close to 11 700 years ago, and the datation has been
transmitted to us via Maneton, Solon on the one hand and it is
established in Sothic years indeed ... which as you know of course is
based on the revolution of Sirius, which was the calendar standard of
pre-dynastic Egypt .... on the other hand such confirmation comes from
other quarters and particularly from the Aztec calendar as deciphered
by the R.P Brasseur de Bourbourg and transmitted in his major works :
1) Histoire des nations civilisées du Mexique et de l'Amérique
Centrale
2) Du Méxique aux monuments Egyptiens

Once accointed again with the UPL, you will understand why the last
Alpine Orogenesis took only in a few hours to be developped to present
higest altitude of the Himalaya, Alps, Rockies, Andies ( in application
of the Pascalian Priniples ) and why all main chute in the world can
be all dated back to that very precise time period
Again you will understand what were another consequence of such
terrible impact though an observation which is valid world wide, and
which the True Geology calls the THE CYCLONIC GRANULOMETRIC PATTERN OF
PLEISTOCENE SEDIMENTATION"
Any idea what that observation of the True Geology means ?

as Sir Don Findlay caustically obsrved :
Quote
People see in things only what they want to see ...
.... and they want to see only what they know !!!
Endquote

With best regards jp


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

wrote:

A view from the True Geology

"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.

--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

""Anders Eklöf"" wrote in message
...
wrote:

A view from the True Geology

"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.

--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

I'm surprised it took you that long. JPT is the kookiest.

George

George a écrit :

""Anders Eklöf"" wrote in message
...
wrote:

A view from the True Geology

"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.

--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

I'm surprised it took you that long. JPT is the kookiest.

George

You should wake up to reality and to an irreversible process at that,
Geerges. People like you are unable to assess the gravity of the
situation indeed. Are you immune to Climate crisis ? ... as this is the
tittle of an article in a Canadian paper

*Quote
Nothing's immune to climate crisis
Warming already underway, officials believe
Margaret Munro, CanWest News Service
Published: Tuesday, October 03, 2006
The team currently has its hands full trying to assess changes and
hazards in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces, where coastal erosion and
rising sea level pose a serious threat.

Truro, N.S., and Charlottetown are at risk of flooding during storm
surges and the icy waters of the Atlantic are encroaching on low-lying
coastal areas. The economic and environmental effects are compounded by
the social and emotional impacts, as Auld knows.

She was originally from the Maritimes, and many of her relatives are
buried in a low-lying graveyard on the north shore of P.E.I., which she
says will soon be underwater.

"I take my kids to see the graves there because I think the sea will
soon be over them," Auld says. "It's very close."

FEELING THE HEAT: HOW CLIMATE IS CHANGING OUR WORLD
etc.
Endquote

When are you going to start thinking for yourself, Georges ?

jp

wrote:
George a écrit :
""Anders Eklöf"" wrote in message
news:1hmnldj.148e40z8v0hlfN%andekl_no@saaf_spam. se...
wrote:
A view from the True Geology
"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.
--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour
I'm surprised it took you that long. JPT is the kookiest.

You should wake up to reality and to an irreversible process at that,
Geerges. People like you are unable to assess the gravity of the
situation indeed. Are you immune to Climate crisis ? ... as this is the
tittle of an article in a Canadian paper

....

Climate Scientist Celebrates Irreversibility of Global Warming
03-18-2005 6:32 AM

WASHINGTON (FNN 24/7) -- A team of climate researchers jubilantly announced
that even if drastic measures were taken, global warming would still get
worse.

Doug Vincent, head researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric
Research, said the findings are a big relief.

"Even if we stabilized greenhouse gases today, the world will still warm and
the sea will rise. And I say it is time to PAR-TAY,"

Vincent said. "We could all worry and be all gloom and doom about global
warming, but if there is nothing we can do about it then I say **** it."

While Vincent is saddened about the fate of the planet, he said it is time
to live a little.

"I am getting each of my kids a snow mobile and voting Republican," he said.

"Don't get me wrong. I am totally bummed about the fate of the planet, but I
am glad I found out now, rather than when I'm 70, so I can stop telling my
friends not to drive SUV's and buy myself one or two."

--
When reality does not match the propaganda, ignore reality.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 3687
nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
http://www.giwersworld.org

wrote in message
ups.com...

George a écrit :

""Anders Eklöf"" wrote in message
...
wrote:

A view from the True Geology

"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.

--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

I'm surprised it took you that long. JPT is the kookiest.

George

You should wake up to reality and to an irreversible process at that,
Geerges. People like you are unable to assess the gravity of the
situation indeed. Are you immune to Climate crisis ? ... as this is the
tittle of an article in a Canadian paper


Everyone knows that lobotomies are irreversible, JP. What a shame that you
feel the need to advertise yours on newsgroups for all to see.

George

O.K., J.P. Turdball! When is the east coast of Australian going to be
hit by a huge tsunami again? You predicted it!

Saul Levy


On 3 Oct 2006 21:45:30 -0700, wrote:


George a écrit :

""Anders Eklöf"" wrote in message
...
wrote:

A view from the True Geology

"True Geology" - that's where I stopped reading.

--
I recommend Macs to my friends, and Windows machines
to those whom I don't mind billing by the hour

I'm surprised it took you that long. JPT is the kookiest.

George

You should wake up to reality and to an irreversible process at that,
Geerges. People like you are unable to assess the gravity of the
situation indeed. Are you immune to Climate crisis ? ... as this is the
tittle of an article in a Canadian paper

*Quote
Nothing's immune to climate crisis
Warming already underway, officials believe
Margaret Munro, CanWest News Service
Published: Tuesday, October 03, 2006
The team currently has its hands full trying to assess changes and
hazards in Quebec and the Atlantic provinces, where coastal erosion and
rising sea level pose a serious threat.

Truro, N.S., and Charlottetown are at risk of flooding during storm
surges and the icy waters of the Atlantic are encroaching on low-lying
coastal areas. The economic and environmental effects are compounded by
the social and emotional impacts, as Auld knows.

She was originally from the Maritimes, and many of her relatives are
buried in a low-lying graveyard on the north shore of P.E.I., which she
says will soon be underwater.

"I take my kids to see the graves there because I think the sea will
soon be over them," Auld says. "It's very close."

FEELING THE HEAT: HOW CLIMATE IS CHANGING OUR WORLD
etc.
Endquote

When are you going to start thinking for yourself, Georges ?

jp

wrote in message
ups.com...
A view from the True Geology

I seem to recall your urgent warnings with regard to Australia last year.
What became of your predictions?

Dyl.