A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

MA flight 370 (what if)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 20th 14, 08:35 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,941
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego
Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and
intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the
past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and
moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain
sight none the less.

However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass
WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,
except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth
of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of
nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified
for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range
it'll have.

There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with
its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most
advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of
Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high
resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss
detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid
and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as
having been flown evasively.

Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all over the
place, and the best know-it-all authority has been tap-dancing like
crazy. Namely our NSA and GCHQ seem to be unusually silent on this one.
Oddly they know exactly where those of us are at any moment, and they
seem to know most everything about us, as well as with whomever we’ve
been speaking or otherwise communicating with, and yet along with
everything MIC, Pentagon, DoD, NSA, GCHQ and Mossad are playing us as
totally dumbfounded on this one.

Perhaps this one is becoming more like a River Dance performance by all
those in charge of protecting us. Now there seems to be a rogue Boeing
777 out there, as fully capable of its being modified for taking out a
hundred million of us. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong?

Since we obviously can not trust what goes on behind those closed doors
and inside the cockpit of any commercial passenger aircraft, there needs
to be a minimum of 3 cameras plus full-time audio and GPS data that can
not be turned off or otherwise easily blocked, as for the passengers and
ground-control to constantly review.

At one frame per second per camera and the audio plus GPS data streaming
could be provided at roughly 1 mb/sec (possibly further compressed down
to 500 kb/sec), with emergency or alert situations pushing their
combined data stream to 45 fps of HD video (15 fps/camera) and otherwise
providing a critical data stream of roughly under 10 mb/sec.

Obviously our NSA computers can easily deal with recording and directly
monitoring ten thousand commercial aircraft, with each at 1 mb/sec is
only a bandwidth demand of 10 GB/sec (roughly .0001% of their global
snooping capability) of which this application only has to be archived
for 24 or 48 hours. The satellite networks and NSA/GCHQ computers
already exist, so there’s no valid excuse not to implement this phase of
public oversight which our government(s) have thus far obviously failed us.

In addition, small break-away portions of tail sections with sufficient
buoyancy can be outfitted with multiple (3+) satellite EPIRBs that can
not be easily drowned or remotely turned off.

Of course, the usual naysay and and obfuscation expertise of our
Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters and associate brown-nosed clowns will have
to disregard this as well as any other suggestions by outsiders, because
like devout ZNRs and brown-nosed clowns they really do not care what
happens to others as long as it’s not their butt getting put at risk.
  #2  
Old March 20th 14, 10:04 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:35:06 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all over the

place, and the best know-it-all authority has been tap-dancing like

crazy. Namely our NSA and GCHQ seem to be unusually silent on this one.

Oddly they know exactly where those of us are at any moment, and they

seem to know most everything about us, as well as with whomever we've

been speaking or otherwise communicating with, and yet along with

everything MIC, Pentagon, DoD, NSA, GCHQ and Mossad are playing us as

totally dumbfounded on this one.



Perhaps this one is becoming more like a River Dance performance by all

those in charge of protecting us. Now there seems to be a rogue Boeing

777 out there, as fully capable of its being modified for taking out a

hundred million of us. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong?



Since we obviously can not trust what goes on behind those closed doors

and inside the cockpit of any commercial passenger aircraft, there needs

to be a minimum of 3 cameras plus full-time audio and GPS data that can

not be turned off or otherwise easily blocked, as for the passengers and

ground-control to constantly review.



At one frame per second per camera and the audio plus GPS data streaming

could be provided at roughly 1 mb/sec (possibly further compressed down

to 500 kb/sec), with emergency or alert situations pushing their

combined data stream to 45 fps of HD video (15 fps/camera) and otherwise

providing a critical data stream of roughly under 10 mb/sec.



Obviously our NSA computers can easily deal with recording and directly

monitoring ten thousand commercial aircraft, with each at 1 mb/sec is

only a bandwidth demand of 10 GB/sec (roughly .0001% of their global

snooping capability) of which this application only has to be archived

for 24 or 48 hours. The satellite networks and NSA/GCHQ computers

already exist, so there's no valid excuse not to implement this phase of

public oversight which our government(s) have thus far obviously failed us.



In addition, small break-away portions of tail sections with sufficient

buoyancy can be outfitted with multiple (3+) satellite EPIRBs that can

not be easily drowned or remotely turned off.



Of course, the usual naysay and and obfuscation expertise of our

Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters and associate brown-nosed clowns will have

to disregard this as well as any other suggestions by outsiders, because

like devout ZNRs and brown-nosed clowns they really do not care what

happens to others as long as it's not their butt getting put at risk.



There is hundreds of trillions at risk, and of those most in charge of our hard earned loot as having been taken from us, have no intentions of their not coming out on top. Their NWO is not intended to share a cent of their wealth and authority with us lower caste, so figure it's either them or us. As in most commercial flights, there were no upper caste oligarchs, Bilderbergs or Rothschilds on board, but there were a number of top level researchers from China working on a cheaper electric cars/trucks along with much better battery capacity, making petroleum fueled transportation as nearly unnecessary. China is currently producing a surplus of clean renewable energy at .3 cent/kwhr, and they're distributing it at 3 cents/kwhr, whereas at 60% efficiency will make their cost per four-passenger mile as little as 5 cents and of full sized SUVs and medium duty trucks costing not more than 10 cents per mile. As these all-electric plugins get more energy storage and usage efficient, their cost per mile will only drop.

Creating yet another extenuating and compounding fear of public flying is just another perfectly viable business-as-usual tactic that's going to cost us big-time, and them upper caste not a cent. In addition to the cost of the 777 ($250M) and even factoring another average million dollars per passenger is just the tip of this spendy iceberg that's costing us at least another $10+M per day in search of it.

In other words, our investment in flight 370 to date (if all are presumed dead) has already exceeded 650 million, and that of what this has been costing the oligarchs, Bilderbergs and Rothschilds that use their fleets of private jets hasn't changed one damn bit.

By 2016, the major airlines expect to transport 3.6 billion passengers/year.. Figure this latest fiasco of MA flight 370 will add on average at least another $10/ticket ($36B/year), or perhaps we should double that just to be on the safe side of what this latest fiasco is going to end up costing us.

With no reported demands, no suggestion whatsoever by any radical group taking credit, and no further instrument contact or pings of any sort, indicates they either exploded mid-air, having landed or at least having attempted to land somewhere exclusive and otherwise remote (though ideally where refueling is an option).

However, hiding that large of an aircraft on land is much easier said than accomplished.

An ocean impact would leave a mark that's large enough for satellite resolution to pick up, unless days have passed and weather has been nasty. There are thousands of sonobuoys as sensitive acoustic detectors already deployed, and supposedly none of those reported any large aircraft impacting the ocean.

If even .1% of pilots are iffy, or even the least bit at risk of becoming a security threat, there's a much bigger problem that should have been detected and addressed long before now. It sounds like these two pilots were friendly with their fellow flight crew, enough to allow access through their security door. What's up with that?

The most direct and simple answer to this ongoing ruse, is that it's on the ground and still in one piece.
  #3  
Old March 20th 14, 10:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default MA flight 370 (what if)



"Brad Guth" wrote in message ...

Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego
Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and
intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the
past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and
moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain
sight none the less.

However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass
WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,
except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth
of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of
nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified
for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range
it'll have.

There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with
its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most
advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of
Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high
resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss
detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid
and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as
having been flown evasively.

Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all

snip GuthBall insanity laden fairy tale


*** I thought you (and your twin Wocky) said that 9/11 was a nuclear
blast event and that a jet liner could no way, no how bring down a
skyscraper ... so which is it, you big dummy ...
  #4  
Old March 21st 14, 12:36 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:48:01 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ...



Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all


snip GuthBall insanity laden fairy tale



*** I thought you (and your twin Wocky) said that 9/11 was a nuclear
blast event and that a jet liner could no way, no how bring down a
skyscraper ... so which is it, you big dummy ...


3+ 50 MT nukes do not have to aim for any specific tall buildings, unless there's a handy one in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Oklahoma and Nevada or California, whereas any of those three or four as hit with a 50 MT would pretty much do us in. However, just one triggering Yellowstone to blow could wipe out a hundred million to start with, and eventually kill billions by the time our planet eventually recovers.
  #5  
Old March 21st 14, 01:29 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

Brad Guth wrote :
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:48:01 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ...



Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all


snip GuthBall insanity laden fairy tale



*** I thought you (and your twin Wocky) said that 9/11 was a nuclear
blast event and that a jet liner could no way, no how bring down a
skyscraper ... so which is it, you big dummy ...


3+ 50 MT nukes do not have to aim for any specific tall buildings, unless
there's a handy one in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Oklahoma and Nevada or
California, whereas any of those three or four as hit with a 50 MT would
pretty much do us in. However, just one triggering Yellowstone to blow could
wipe out a hundred million to start with, and eventually kill billions by the
time our planet eventually recovers.



*** That'd be OK with me, as long as at least half of them are
Liberals ... Liberals are to politics what GLBTs are to human
procreation ... a dead end ...
  #6  
Old March 21st 14, 01:48 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Friday, March 21, 2014 6:29:41 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
Brad Guth wrote :

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:48:01 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:


"Brad Guth" wrote in message ...








Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego




Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and




intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the




past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and




moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain




sight none the less.








However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass




WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,




except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth




of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of




nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified




for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range




it'll have.








There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with




its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most




advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of




Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high




resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss




detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid




and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as




having been flown evasively.








Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all






snip GuthBall insanity laden fairy tale








*** I thought you (and your twin Wocky) said that 9/11 was a nuclear


blast event and that a jet liner could no way, no how bring down a


skyscraper ... so which is it, you big dummy ...




3+ 50 MT nukes do not have to aim for any specific tall buildings, unless


there's a handy one in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Oklahoma and Nevada or


California, whereas any of those three or four as hit with a 50 MT would


pretty much do us in. However, just one triggering Yellowstone to blow could


wipe out a hundred million to start with, and eventually kill billions by the


time our planet eventually recovers.



*** That'd be OK with me, as long as at least half of them are
Liberals ... Liberals are to politics what GLBTs are to human
procreation ... a dead end ...


You'd be of the first to go, because what pathetic nation on Earth needs unproductive individuals like yourself that are costing them a small fortune and that always have to get trained on the job in order to accomplish simple tasks?

In a truly modern and honest open society, only 1% need be actively working and thus in charge of making it better for everyone else. However, in your ZNR/GOP world, 99.9% must work themselves to death at minimal or deficient pay, so that the upper .1% caste like yourself get to live large.
  #7  
Old March 21st 14, 03:30 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:35:06 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all over the

place, and the best know-it-all authority has been tap-dancing like

crazy. Namely our NSA and GCHQ seem to be unusually silent on this one.

Oddly they know exactly where those of us are at any moment, and they

seem to know most everything about us, as well as with whomever we've

been speaking or otherwise communicating with, and yet along with

everything MIC, Pentagon, DoD, NSA, GCHQ and Mossad are playing us as

totally dumbfounded on this one.



Perhaps this one is becoming more like a River Dance performance by all

those in charge of protecting us. Now there seems to be a rogue Boeing

777 out there, as fully capable of its being modified for taking out a

hundred million of us. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong?



Since we obviously can not trust what goes on behind those closed doors

and inside the cockpit of any commercial passenger aircraft, there needs

to be a minimum of 3 cameras plus full-time audio and GPS data that can

not be turned off or otherwise easily blocked, as for the passengers and

ground-control to constantly review.



At one frame per second per camera and the audio plus GPS data streaming

could be provided at roughly 1 mb/sec (possibly further compressed down

to 500 kb/sec), with emergency or alert situations pushing their

combined data stream to 45 fps of HD video (15 fps/camera) and otherwise

providing a critical data stream of roughly under 10 mb/sec.



Obviously our NSA computers can easily deal with recording and directly

monitoring ten thousand commercial aircraft, with each at 1 mb/sec is

only a bandwidth demand of 10 GB/sec (roughly .0001% of their global

snooping capability) of which this application only has to be archived

for 24 or 48 hours. The satellite networks and NSA/GCHQ computers

already exist, so there's no valid excuse not to implement this phase of

public oversight which our government(s) have thus far obviously failed us.



In addition, small break-away portions of tail sections with sufficient

buoyancy can be outfitted with multiple (3+) satellite EPIRBs that can

not be easily drowned or remotely turned off.



Of course, the usual naysay and and obfuscation expertise of our

Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters and associate brown-nosed clowns will have

to disregard this as well as any other suggestions by outsiders, because

like devout ZNRs and brown-nosed clowns they really do not care what

happens to others as long as it's not their butt getting put at risk.


Putting live cameras and full audio feedback from each and every commercial passenger aircraft cockpit, as made available for passengers to see and hear, as well as via satellite links for everyone else to see and hear, should have been an aviation standard as of at least a decade ago.

Problem is, there are hundreds of trillions at risk, and of those most in charge of our hard earned loot as having been extorted or simply taken from us, have no intentions of their not coming out on top regardless of whomever we elect or appoint. Their NWO is simply not intended to reduce any wealth or authority disparity by sharing any cent of their extorted wealth and authority with us lower caste that always get to pay for everything, so figure it's either them or us.

As in most commercial flights, there were never any upper caste oligarchs, Bilderbergs or Rothschilds on board, and thereby not getting put at risk, but with MA flight 370 there were a number of top level researchers from China working on their development of much cheaper electric cars/trucks along with much a lot battery capacity, making their future of petroleum/hydrocarbon fueled transportation as becoming nearly unnecessary. China is currently producing a surplus of clean renewable energy at .3 cent/kwhr, and they're distributing that energy at 3 cents/kwhr, whereas at 60% efficiency will make their cost per four-passenger mile as little as 5 cents (1.25 cent/passenger mile) and of full sized SUVs and medium duty trucks costing not more than 10 cents per mile. As these all-electric plugins get more energy storage capable and usage efficient, their cost per mile will only drop by as much as a third.

On the other hand, of creating yet another extenuating and compounding fear of public flying is just another perfectly viable business-as-usual tactic that's going to cost us big-time, and them upper caste not a cent. In addition to the cost of the 777 ($250M) and even factoring another average million dollars per passenger is just the tip of this spendy iceberg that's costing us at least another $10+M per day in search of it.

In other words, our ongoing investment in flight 370 to date (if all are presumed dead) has already exceeded 650 million, and that of what this fiasco has been costing the oligarchs, Bilderbergs and Rothschilds that use their fleets of private jets, hasn't changed one damn bit.

By 2016, the major airlines expect to transport 3.6 billion passengers/year.. Figure this latest fiasco of MA flight 370 will add on average at least another $10/ticket ($36B/year), or perhaps we should double that just to be on the safe side of what this latest fiasco and subsequent upgrade is going to end up costing us.

With no reported demands, no suggestion whatsoever by any radical group taking credit, and no further instrument contact or pings of any sort, indicates they were either exploded in mid-air, or as having landed or at least having attempted to land somewhere exclusive and otherwise remote (though ideally where refueling is an option).

However, hiding that large of an aircraft on land is much easier said than accomplished.

An ocean impact would leave a mark that's large enough for satellite resolution to pick up, unless days have passed and weather has been nasty. There are thousands of sonobuoys as sensitive acoustic detectors already deployed, and supposedly none of those reported any large aircraft impacting the ocean. But that's assuming our government(s) have always been telling us the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

If even .1% of pilots are iffy, or even the least bit at risk of becoming a security or otherwise a mentally unhealthy threat, there's a much bigger problem that should have been detected and addressed long before now. It sounds like these two pilots were each friendly with their fellow flight crew, enough to allow access through their security door. What's up with that?

Perhaps the most direct and simple answer to this ongoing ruse, is that it's on the ground and still in one piece.
  #8  
Old March 21st 14, 05:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2TreBert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,875
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 4:35:06 PM UTC-4, Brad Guth wrote:
Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all over the

place, and the best know-it-all authority has been tap-dancing like

crazy. Namely our NSA and GCHQ seem to be unusually silent on this one.

Oddly they know exactly where those of us are at any moment, and they

seem to know most everything about us, as well as with whomever we've

been speaking or otherwise communicating with, and yet along with

everything MIC, Pentagon, DoD, NSA, GCHQ and Mossad are playing us as

totally dumbfounded on this one.



Perhaps this one is becoming more like a River Dance performance by all

those in charge of protecting us. Now there seems to be a rogue Boeing

777 out there, as fully capable of its being modified for taking out a

hundred million of us. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong?



Since we obviously can not trust what goes on behind those closed doors

and inside the cockpit of any commercial passenger aircraft, there needs

to be a minimum of 3 cameras plus full-time audio and GPS data that can

not be turned off or otherwise easily blocked, as for the passengers and

ground-control to constantly review.



At one frame per second per camera and the audio plus GPS data streaming

could be provided at roughly 1 mb/sec (possibly further compressed down

to 500 kb/sec), with emergency or alert situations pushing their

combined data stream to 45 fps of HD video (15 fps/camera) and otherwise

providing a critical data stream of roughly under 10 mb/sec.



Obviously our NSA computers can easily deal with recording and directly

monitoring ten thousand commercial aircraft, with each at 1 mb/sec is

only a bandwidth demand of 10 GB/sec (roughly .0001% of their global

snooping capability) of which this application only has to be archived

for 24 or 48 hours. The satellite networks and NSA/GCHQ computers

already exist, so there's no valid excuse not to implement this phase of

public oversight which our government(s) have thus far obviously failed us.



In addition, small break-away portions of tail sections with sufficient

buoyancy can be outfitted with multiple (3+) satellite EPIRBs that can

not be easily drowned or remotely turned off.



Of course, the usual naysay and and obfuscation expertise of our

Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters and associate brown-nosed clowns will have

to disregard this as well as any other suggestions by outsiders, because

like devout ZNRs and brown-nosed clowns they really do not care what

happens to others as long as it's not their butt getting put at risk.


Its on the ground in aluminum dust. Suicide dive and hit the ground going 5,200 MPH straight down. Look for crater.TreBert
  #9  
Old March 21st 14, 06:27 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

Brad Guth used his keyboard to write :
On Friday, March 21, 2014 6:29:41 AM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
Brad Guth wrote :

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 3:48:01 PM UTC-7, Hägar wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message ...






Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego


Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and


intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the


past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and


moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain


sight none the less.








However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass


WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,


except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth


of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of


nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified


for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range


it'll have.








There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with


its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most


advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of


Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high


resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss


detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid


and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as


having been flown evasively.








Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all




snip GuthBall insanity laden fairy tale






*** I thought you (and your twin Wocky) said that 9/11 was a nuclear
blast event and that a jet liner could no way, no how bring down a
skyscraper ... so which is it, you big dummy ...




3+ 50 MT nukes do not have to aim for any specific tall buildings, unless
there's a handy one in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Oklahoma and Nevada or
California, whereas any of those three or four as hit with a 50 MT would
pretty much do us in. However, just one triggering Yellowstone to blow
could wipe out a hundred million to start with, and eventually kill
billions by the time our planet eventually recovers.



*** That'd be OK with me, as long as at least half of them are
Liberals ... Liberals are to politics what GLBTs are to human
procreation ... a dead end ...


You'd be of the first to go, because what pathetic nation on Earth needs
unproductive individuals like yourself that are costing them a small fortune
and that always have to get trained on the job in order to accomplish simple
tasks?


In a truly modern and honest open society, only 1% need be actively working
and thus in charge of making it better for everyone else. However, in your
ZNR/GOP world, 99.9% must work themselves to death at minimal or deficient
pay, so that the upper .1% caste like yourself get to live large.




*** Just how long do you think it would be before the 1% that is
working will put up with your gradiose wealth redidtribution plans
and free everything for all the remaining 99% deadbeats, losers,
assorted faggots, sheep fornicators and child molestors ???
  #10  
Old March 21st 14, 08:39 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default MA flight 370 (what if)

On Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:35:06 PM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
Since the Malaysia Airlines Flight-370 was most likely diverted to Diego

Garcia, and the official search plus news media had been totally and

intentionally snookered into looking in the opposite direction for the

past week, whereas by now it has likely been modified, refueled and

moved to practically any location on Earth, as easily hidden in plain

sight none the less.



However, a ghost 777 could be made into the biggest and most bad-ass

WMD, easily cloaked as simply another conventional passenger aircraft,

except capable of packing multiple(3+) 50 MT nukes, or 150 tonnes worth

of toxic VX as well as something biological if not simply a load of

nuclear spent-fuel Pu238 (of which there's no shortage of). If modified

for in-flight refueling, there's no telling of how much added range

it'll have.



There's simply no possible way our highly secretive MIC/DoD outpost with

its 3200+ as highly trained and skilled personnel with loads of the most

advanced and specialized technology at the isolated island outpost of

Diego Garcia, is as such without full radial radar and multiple high

resolution surveillance via satellites that couldn't possibly miss

detecting a very hot 777 that's clearly reported as having been off-grid

and most likely way the hell off course, and as recently disclosed as

having been flown evasively.



Once again (as in the 9-11 fiasco), those red flags are all over the

place, and the best know-it-all authority has been tap-dancing like

crazy. Namely our NSA and GCHQ seem to be unusually silent on this one.

Oddly they know exactly where those of us are at any moment, and they

seem to know most everything about us, as well as with whomever we've

been speaking or otherwise communicating with, and yet along with

everything MIC, Pentagon, DoD, NSA, GCHQ and Mossad are playing us as

totally dumbfounded on this one.



Perhaps this one is becoming more like a River Dance performance by all

those in charge of protecting us. Now there seems to be a rogue Boeing

777 out there, as fully capable of its being modified for taking out a

hundred million of us. Gee whiz, what could possibly go wrong?



Since we obviously can not trust what goes on behind those closed doors

and inside the cockpit of any commercial passenger aircraft, there needs

to be a minimum of 3 cameras plus full-time audio and GPS data that can

not be turned off or otherwise easily blocked, as for the passengers and

ground-control to constantly review.



At one frame per second per camera and the audio plus GPS data streaming

could be provided at roughly 1 mb/sec (possibly further compressed down

to 500 kb/sec), with emergency or alert situations pushing their

combined data stream to 45 fps of HD video (15 fps/camera) and otherwise

providing a critical data stream of roughly under 10 mb/sec.



Obviously our NSA computers can easily deal with recording and directly

monitoring ten thousand commercial aircraft, with each at 1 mb/sec is

only a bandwidth demand of 10 GB/sec (roughly .0001% of their global

snooping capability) of which this application only has to be archived

for 24 or 48 hours. The satellite networks and NSA/GCHQ computers

already exist, so there's no valid excuse not to implement this phase of

public oversight which our government(s) have thus far obviously failed us.



In addition, small break-away portions of tail sections with sufficient

buoyancy can be outfitted with multiple (3+) satellite EPIRBs that can

not be easily drowned or remotely turned off.



Of course, the usual naysay and and obfuscation expertise of our

Usenet/newsgroup FUD-masters and associate brown-nosed clowns will have

to disregard this as well as any other suggestions by outsiders, because

like devout ZNRs and brown-nosed clowns they really do not care what

happens to others as long as it's not their butt getting put at risk.


If this were the 1950s, or even mid 60s (MIC cold-war heaven), perhaps losing track of an entire large commercial aircraft loaded with only the sorts of limited technology of its era (including a basic compass which the Boeing 777 most certainly had unless it too was tossed out the window) might be conceivable. However, nowadays with so much redundancy on board and lots of nations scanning in every possible direction for any potentially rogue aircraft or incoming missile, such as detecting and tracking those of much smaller and nearly radar stealth spy planes and especially of missiles that wouldn't represent .1% as much viable radar target, and that's not to mention dozens of spy satellites going most every which-way covering most every square meter of our planet, as well as weather radars and IR imaging resolution that's nearly sufficient enough to detect items as large and hot as a Boeing 777 (especially noticed if it had been reported as off-grid), would be highly unlikely that such a large and robust target could so easily vanish.

Even returning satellites as random debris of any significant size is spotted and tracked by multiple means. However, intentionally stealth and officially off-grid are those items of military and MIC R&D taking place without warnings or much less official identification, and those items get to go and do as they please. So, perhaps we have yet another friendly-fire or simply another unfortunate mid-air encounter as having taken place, and if so there's no way in hell we're ever going to get the whole truth and nothing but the truth from those of any authority. In other words, that large aircraft and its 239 people might as well have been abducted by ETs.

Of course those initial delays and assorted obstructions by MA and of their own plus other surrounding governments (especially including the British and US operated remote outpost of Diego Garcia) is clearly what made this fiasco much worse than it ever needed to get, and for that they should get their socks blown off, as held equally accountable for the needless demise of 239 individuals, just like those submarines as having been surfaced directly below TWA flight 800 should have been held accountable for at least something.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flight 77 debris was American Airlines Flight 965 Brad Guth[_3_] Misc 2 October 11th 13 02:37 PM
STS-131 - Flight Day 3/4 John[_1_] Space Shuttle 1 April 9th 10 01:57 PM
STS-127 - FLIGHT DAY 1-3 John[_1_] Space Station 0 July 18th 09 01:10 PM
STS-126 - FLIGHT DAY 9/10 John[_1_] Space Station 0 November 23rd 08 10:42 PM
STS-122 - FLIGHT DAY 11 /12 John[_1_] Space Shuttle 0 February 18th 08 06:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.