Another method to find the missing Flight 370

I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/

"Rocky" wrote in message
...

I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?


*** KOOK

On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some
have speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that
the two were depicted as one radar blip.

"Hägar" wrote in message
...


"Rocky" wrote in message
...

I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?


*** KOOK

And you are a ripper because you ripped the following from my post:

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning and not
at night.

Rocky

Rocky submitted this idea :
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a much
bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning and not
at night.

Rocky



*** What do YOU think they are "chem-trailing", Wocky ???

On 3/17/2014 9:32 PM, Rocky wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning and not
at night.

Rocky


Rethinking this a bit, that our best chemtrail aircraft would likely
have full night-vision capability, and the IR footprint of any active
777 would actually represent a very hot target. Just the body heat from
239 people should be easily picked up, even if everything else was shut
off and it was being towed by another aircraft, or parked most anywhere
on the ground.

Not too many remote airstrips would even have a large enough hanger to
hide a 777.

Personally, I'm thinking that governments are in on this one, at the
very least by obfuscating evidence and otherwise lying their
public-funded butts off.

Basically, they got a very stealth flying bomber out of this, plus lots
of folks to trade for prisoners, because at most any time an easily
modified 777 could be slipped into an existing air traffic route, as
easily masked and electronically identified as some other valid
commercial aircraft.

In other words, we got 9-11 version 2.0 headed our way, or perhaps this
time headed for those Rothschilds.

Brad Guth brought next idea :
On 3/17/2014 9:32 PM, Rocky wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning and
not
at night.

Rocky


Rethinking this a bit, that our best chemtrail aircraft would likely have
full night-vision capability, and the IR footprint of any active 777 would
actually represent a very hot target. Just the body heat from 239 people
should be easily picked up, even if everything else was shut off and it was
being towed by another aircraft, or parked most anywhere on the ground.

Not too many remote airstrips would even have a large enough hanger to hide a
777.

Personally, I'm thinking that governments are in on this one, at the very
least by obfuscating evidence and otherwise lying their public-funded butts
off.

Basically, they got a very stealth flying bomber out of this, plus lots of
folks to trade for prisoners, because at most any time an easily modified 777
could be slipped into an existing air traffic route, as easily masked and
electronically identified as some other valid commercial aircraft.

In other words, we got 9-11 version 2.0 headed our way, or perhaps this time
headed for those Rothschilds.



*** Looks like 9/11 did some permanent brain damage to all you
Liberal whiners and conspiracy nuts ...

On 3/18/2014 8:29 AM, Hägar wrote:
Brad Guth brought next idea :
On 3/17/2014 9:32 PM, Rocky wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just
ask the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/



Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and
some have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the
two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning
and not
at night.

Rocky


Rethinking this a bit, that our best chemtrail aircraft would likely
have full night-vision capability, and the IR footprint of any active
777 would actually represent a very hot target. Just the body heat
from 239 people should be easily picked up, even if everything else
was shut off and it was being towed by another aircraft, or parked
most anywhere on the ground.

Not too many remote airstrips would even have a large enough hanger to
hide a 777.

Personally, I'm thinking that governments are in on this one, at the
very least by obfuscating evidence and otherwise lying their
public-funded butts off.

Basically, they got a very stealth flying bomber out of this, plus
lots of folks to trade for prisoners, because at most any time an
easily modified 777 could be slipped into an existing air traffic
route, as easily masked and electronically identified as some other
valid commercial aircraft.

In other words, we got 9-11 version 2.0 headed our way, or perhaps
this time headed for those Rothschilds.


*** Looks like 9/11 did some permanent brain damage to all you
Liberal whiners and conspiracy nuts ...

Looks like once again you do not give any tinkers damn about others, and
have nothing whatsoever constructive to offer this or any other topic.

Rocky used his keyboard to write :
"Hägar" wrote in message
...
Brad Guth brought next idea :
On 3/17/2014 9:32 PM, Rocky wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On 3/17/2014 4:42 PM, Rocky wrote:
I am looking into the missing Flight 370 and why don't they just ask
the
pilots laying chemtrails if they saw anything?

FYI chemtrails is the old term and the new term is geo engineering.

http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/c...o-engineering/


Perhaps chemtrail pilots could have spotted it, because there is not a
much bigger aircraft than a 777. However, it was nighttime, and some
have
speculated that it closely tailed another large aircraft so that the two
were depicted as one radar blip.

Very good point because I see the most chemtrail jets in the morning and
not
at night.

Rocky


Rethinking this a bit, that our best chemtrail aircraft would likely have
full night-vision capability, and the IR footprint of any active 777 would
actually represent a very hot target. Just the body heat from 239 people
should be easily picked up, even if everything else was shut off and it
was being towed by another aircraft, or parked most anywhere on the
ground.

Not too many remote airstrips would even have a large enough hanger to
hide a 777.

Personally, I'm thinking that governments are in on this one, at the very
least by obfuscating evidence and otherwise lying their public-funded
butts off.

Basically, they got a very stealth flying bomber out of this, plus lots of
folks to trade for prisoners, because at most any time an easily modified
777 could be slipped into an existing air traffic route, as easily masked
and electronically identified as some other valid commercial aircraft.

In other words, we got 9-11 version 2.0 headed our way, or perhaps this
time headed for those Rothschilds.



*** Looks like 9/11 did some permanent brain damage to all you
Liberal whiners and conspiracy nuts ...

ROTFLMAO because only an idiot like you or other mass mediatologist would
believe a jet fuel controlled demolition can vaporize buildings better than a
normal controlled demolition.

And don't forget that WTC3 was also vaporized and why more of WTC3 was
vaporized after the North Tower was nuked helps prove the nuke that vaporized
the North Tower was really under WTC3.

And again. Of all the theories combined including the "Official Collapse
Theory" only one of those theory considers the damage done to every single
building at Ground Zero and the building north of WTC7. G

Rocky



*** Oh yea, Wocky, your nuclear bomb theory really make a lot more
sense than a jetliner full of fuel ... idiot.