A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 13th 20, 05:35 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed

John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm

Einstein made space and time "adjust themselves" and the speed of light did become constant (in Einstein's schizophrenic world, not in the real world):

Brian Greene: "Space and time adjust themselves in an exactly compensating manner so that observations of light's speed yield the same result, regardless of the observer's velocity." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics...-nutshell.html

Yet the constancy of the speed of light produced an even greater nonsense. Frequency shift plus constant speed of light entails wavelength shift, in accordance with the formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

That is, in this scenario

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE

the moving observer will measure frequency increase only if, in front of him, the distance between light pulses somehow decreases. This wavelength shift triggered by the motion of the observer is too idiotic, even by the standards of the Einstein cult, and Einsteinians don't teach it explicitly. The scientific community still does not see the variable-wavelength idiocy, but this blindness cannot go on forever.

If there is a next, Einstein-free version of fundamental physics, Einstein's 1905 nonsensical axiom

"The speed of light is constant"

will be replaced with the correct and easily justifiable axiom

"For a given emitter, the wavelength of light is constant".

I have developed the idea in a series of tweets he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old August 13th 20, 09:53 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed

Sometimes scientists forget, for a moment, to obey Einstein's ideology, and reach a simple truth which will become the fundamental law of future, Einstein-free physics. Here is the truth:

Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Example:

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: "Consider a falling object. ITS SPEED INCREASES AS IT IS FALLING. Hence, if we were to associate a frequency with that object the frequency should increase accordingly as it falls to earth. Because of the equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass, WE SHOULD OBSERVE THE SAME EFFECT FOR LIGHT. So lets shine a light beam from the top of a very tall building. If we can measure the frequency shift as the light beam descends the building, we should be able to discern how gravity affects a falling light beam. This was done by Pound and Rebka in 1960. They shone a light from the top of the Jefferson tower at Harvard and measured the frequency shift. The frequency shift was tiny but in agreement with the theoretical prediction. Consider a light beam that is travelling away from a gravitational field. Its frequency should shift to lower values. This is known as the gravitational red shift of light." https://courses.physics.illinois.edu...re13/L13r.html

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old August 14th 20, 09:53 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed

The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light) / (wavelength)

allows the introduction of two axioms that lead in opposite directions:

Axiom 1 (Einstein's physics): The speed of light is constant. Corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift.

Axiom 2 (Einstein-free physics): The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Axiom 1 killed fundamental physics (converted it into an insane ideology). Axiom 2 will resurrect it (if it's not too late).

It is easy to show that the wavelength of light remains constant

(A) when the observer starts moving towards the emitter.

(B) when the emitter starts moving towards the observer.

(C) when light falls in a gravitational field.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #4  
Old August 14th 20, 10:02 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed

The formula (frequency)=(speed of light)/(wavelength) allows the introduction of two axioms that lead in opposite directions:

Axiom 1 (Einstein's physics): The speed of light is constant. Corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) an inversely proportional wavelength shift.

Axiom 2 (Einstein-free physics): The wavelength of light is constant (for a given emitter). Corollary: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speed-of-light shift.

Axiom 1 killed fundamental physics (converted it into an insane ideology). Axiom 2 will resurrect it (if it's not too late).

It is easy to show that the wavelength of light remains constant

(A) when the observer starts moving towards the emitter.

(B) when the emitter starts moving towards the observer.

(C) when light falls in a gravitational field.

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Albert Einstein Institute Unwittingly Disproves Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 August 7th 20 04:34 PM
Why Einstein's Spacetime Is Doomed as Fundamental Notion Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 October 9th 17 04:13 PM
Why Einstein's Relativity Is Doomed Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 9th 17 11:42 AM
Why Einstein's Spacetime Is Doomed Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 26th 16 05:32 PM
GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 962 December 17th 07 01:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.