Big Bang Cosmology

How can anybody be stupid enough to believe in a big bang cosmology
that states.

That the processor of your computer only was on once, 13.7 billion
years ago, in a big bang.

But that the program known as the universe, still is running, 13.7
billion years after you turned off my computer.

Just like a computer processor must be active for a program to run.

The big bang must be continuous for the universe to be active.

On Mar 29, 5:05 am, wrote:

Just like a computer processor must be active for a program to run.

The big bang must be continuous for the universe to be active.

Ka-ching! Give the man a gold star on that one. :-) Now you need to
brush up on your civility and decorum. Y'know, tact, diplomacy and
that kinda earthling stuff.

BTW Zanth, you haven't commented on those two 'litmus test' questions
presented in another thread, stuff that'd be basic to the science of
any spacefaring race: 1.) What is the nature of space? 2.) What is the
causal mechanism of gravity?

Still awaiting your dissertation..____________.

oc

1.) What is the nature of space? division.
2.) What is the causal mechanism of gravity? attraction.

On 29/3/07 15:17, in article
, "oldcoot"
wrote:

On Mar 29, 5:05 am, wrote:

Just like a computer processor must be active for a program to run.

The big bang must be continuous for the universe to be active.

Ka-ching! Give the man a gold star on that one. :-) Now you need to
brush up on your civility and decorum. Y'know, tact, diplomacy and
that kinda earthling stuff.

BTW Zanth, you haven't commented on those two 'litmus test' questions
presented in another thread, stuff that'd be basic to the science of
any spacefaring race: 1.) What is the nature of space? 2.) What is the
causal mechanism of gravity?

Still awaiting your dissertation..____________.

You'll take any loon wont you coot? Imaginary physicists and now imaginary
aliens.


--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

On Mar 29, 6:41 am, wrote:
1.) What is the nature of space? division.
2.) What is the causal mechanism of gravity? attraction.

BZZZAP! So much for your claim to ET alien-hood. Sure you ain't been
hangin' out with Darla? :-}
oc

1.) What is the nature of space? division.
2.) What is the causal mechanism of gravity? attraction.

BZZZAP! So much for your claim to ET alien-hood. Sure you ain't been
hangin' out with Darla? :-}
oc

Tell me what it is.

On 29/3/07 16:12, in article
,
" wrote:

1.) What is the nature of space? division.
2.) What is the causal mechanism of gravity? attraction.

BZZZAP! So much for your claim to ET alien-hood. Sure you ain't been
hangin' out with Darla? :-}
oc

Tell me what it is.


Its it, what is it?

--
Painius admits he cannot answer a single question to NB:

"Yes, you're right of course, NB. And they get very useless very quickly.
I shall do my best to ignore them, as you wish."

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

On 29/3/07 16:12, in article
. com,
" wrote:

1.) What is the nature of space? division.
2.) What is the causal mechanism of gravity? attraction.

BZZZAP! So much for your claim to ET alien-hood. Sure you ain't been
hangin' out with Darla? :-}
oc

Tell me what it is.


Its it, what is it?

Where?

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert