A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Solar Minimum Explodes



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 15th 05, 09:47 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Solar Minimum Explodes

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2...inexplodes.htm

Solar Minimum Explodes
NASA Science News
September 15, 2005

Solar minimum is looking strangely like Solar Max.

September 15, 2005: Just one week ago, on Sept. 7th, a huge sunspot
rounded the sun's eastern limb. As soon as it appeared, it exploded,
producing one of the brightest x-ray solar flares of the Space Age. In
the days that followed, the growing spot exploded eight more times.
Each
powerful "X-flare" caused a shortwave radio blackout on Earth and
pumped
new energy into a radiation storm around our planet. The blasts hurled
magnetic clouds toward Earth, and when they hit, on Sept 10th and 11th,
ruby-red auroras were seen as far south as Arizona.

So this is solar minimum?

Actually, solar minimum, the lowest point of the sun's 11-year activity
cycle, isn't due until 2006, but forecasters expected 2005, the eve of
solar minimum, to be a quiet year on the sun.

It has not been quiet. 2005 began with an X-flare on New Year's Day--a
sign of things to come. Since then we've experienced 4 severe
geomagnetic storms and 14 more X-flares.

"That's a lot of activity," says solar physicist David Hathaway of the
National Space Science and Technology Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

Compare 2005 to the most recent Solar Max: "In the year 2000," he
recalls, "there were 3 severe geomagnetic storms and 17 X-flares." 2005
registers about the same in both categories. Solar minimum is looking
strangely like Solar Max.

Scientists like Hathaway track the 11-year solar cycle by counting
sunspots. When sunspot numbers peak, that's Solar Max, and when they
ebb, that's solar minimum. This is supposed to work because sunspots
are
the main sources of solar activity: Sunspot magnetic fields become
unstable and explode. The explosion produces a flash of electromagnetic
radiation--a solar flare. It can also hurl a billion-ton cloud of
magnetized gas into space--a coronal mass ejection or "CME." When the
CME reaches Earth, it sparks a geomagnetic storm and we see auroras.
CMEs can also propel protons toward Earth, producing a radiation storm
dangerous to astronauts and satellites. All these things come from
sunspots.

As expected, sunspot numbers have declined since 2000, yet solar
activity persists. How can this be?

Hathaway answers: "The sunspots of 2005, while fewer, have done more
than their share of exploding." Consider sunspot 798/808, the source of
the Sept 7th superflare and eight lesser X-flares. All by itself, this
sunspot has made Sept. 2005 the most active month on the sun since
March
1991.

Weird? Much about the sun's activity cycle remains unknown, Hathaway
points out. "X-ray observations of flares by NOAA's Earth-orbiting
satellites began in 1975, and CMEs were discovered only a few years
earlier by the 7th Orbiting Solar Observatory. Before the 1970s, our
records are spotty."

This means we don't know what is typical. Scientists have monitored
only
three complete solar cycles using satellite technology. "It's risky to
draw conclusions" from such a short span of data, he says.

[Graphic]

Above: Sunspot counts and X-flares during the last three solar cycles.
Note how solar activity continues even during solar minimum. Credit:
David Hathaway, NASA/NSSTC.

Hathaway offers a cautionary tale: Before 2005, the last solar minimum
was due in 1996 and the sun, at the time, seemed to be behaving
perfectly: From late-1992 until mid-1996, sunspots began to disappear
and there were precisely zero X-flares during those long years. It was
a
time of quiet. Then, in 1996 when sunspot counts finally reached their
lowest value - bang! - an X-flare erupted.

"The sun can be very unpredictable," says Hathaway, which is something
NASA planners must take into account when they send humans back to the
Moon and on to Mars.

Returning to 2005: is this year an aberration--or a normal rush to the
bottom of the solar cycle? "We need to observe more solar cycles to
answer that question," says Hathaway. "And because each cycle lasts 11
years, observing takes time."

Meanwhile, Hathaway is waiting for 2006 when solar minimum finally
arrives. Who knows what the Sun will do then?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Asteroids Caused the Early Inner Solar System Cataclysm [email protected] Astronomy Misc 0 September 15th 05 07:38 PM
Solar flares: is iron-rich sun the cause? (Forwarded) Andrew Yee Astronomy Misc 1 November 19th 03 08:20 PM
NASA Wants You to be a Solar System Ambassador Ron Baalke Amateur Astronomy 0 September 12th 03 01:32 AM
NASA Wants You to be a Solar System Ambassador Ron Baalke Misc 0 September 12th 03 01:32 AM
Solar Wind Make Waves; Killer Electrons Go Surfing Ron Baalke Misc 0 September 10th 03 05:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.