A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Orbital Space Plane



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 26th 03, 05:03 PM
Dr. O
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Orbital Space Plane


"Doug Ellison" wrote in message
...

Errrr - $200b? You obviously havnt a clue what Mars Direct actually is

then?


So, you're one of the few who thinks this can be done for $20billion

then?
Ha!


It can certainly be done for a great deal less than $200b


That's what they said about the Space Station. It has already souped up more
than $100billion and it's still climbing. And worse, it isn't even operating
at half capacity. It's just a trailerhome in space! Don't believe Zurbrin
and his crap. Any Mars mission will cost AT LEAST $200billion, if not more.
"And for what?" people will ask. There are too many unemployed and people
trying to scrape together a living in the U.S. and they're all voters. No,
sir. This isn't going to fly. Heck, people are already complaining about the
$80billon or so spent in Iraq. Do you really think they're gonna allow a
$200billion mission to Mars? Get real.


  #12  
Old September 26th 03, 06:24 PM
Henry Spencer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Orbital Space Plane

In article , Dr. O dr.o@xxxxx wrote:
It can certainly be done for a great deal less than $200b


That's what they said about the Space Station.


Yes, and it was true, too. Don't confuse "could be done for less than X"
with "cannot possibly exceed X no matter how screwed up the program is".
(It is difficult to imagine a program more screwed up than the station.)

...Any Mars mission will cost AT LEAST $200billion, if not more.


If it's done as a "business as usual" effort by today's NASA, yes, it
probably would. Better management, not better mission profile, is the key
to doing it much more cheaply.
--
MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer
first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! |
  #13  
Old September 26th 03, 08:32 PM
Dick Morris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Orbital Space Plane


"O" for Ordover?

"Dr. O" wrote:

"Doug Ellison" wrote in message
...

Errrr - $200b? You obviously havnt a clue what Mars Direct actually is
then?


So, you're one of the few who thinks this can be done for $20billion

then?
Ha!


NASA couldn't, but if I had $20 billion, up front, I could get to Mars
in about 15 years.


It can certainly be done for a great deal less than $200b


That's what they said about the Space Station. It has already souped up more
than $100billion and it's still climbing.


The cost, thus far, is less than a third of that.

And worse, it isn't even operating
at half capacity.


It's only half built.

It's just a trailerhome in space! Don't believe Zurbrin
and his crap. Any Mars mission will cost AT LEAST $200 billion, if not more.


Are you an engineer?

"And for what?" people will ask. There are too many unemployed and people
trying to scrape together a living in the U.S. and they're all voters. No,
sir. This isn't going to fly. Heck, people are already complaining about the
$80billon or so spent in Iraq. Do you really think they're gonna allow a
$200billion mission to Mars?


Not a chance.
  #14  
Old September 26th 03, 11:29 PM
Dick Morris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Orbital Space Plane



Henry Spencer wrote:

In article , Dr. O dr.o@xxxxx wrote:
It can certainly be done for a great deal less than $200b


That's what they said about the Space Station.


Yes, and it was true, too. Don't confuse "could be done for less than X"
with "cannot possibly exceed X no matter how screwed up the program is".
(It is difficult to imagine a program more screwed up than the station.)

...Any Mars mission will cost AT LEAST $200billion, if not more.


If it's done as a "business as usual" effort by today's NASA, yes, it
probably would. Better management, not better mission profile, is the key
to doing it much more cheaply.


Better management is a necessary, though not sufficient, condition. A
bad design could still drive costs through the roof, and there are a lot
of bad designs out there. There is still a lot of room for improvements
in mission design which could reduce costs substantially. It is
probably true that better management would be more likely to pick a good
design, but it doesn't necessarily follow.
--
MOST launched 1015 EDT 30 June, separated 1046, | Henry Spencer
first ground-station pass 1651, all nominal! |

  #15  
Old October 4th 03, 05:15 AM
Allen Meece
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Orbital Space Plane

...Any Mars mission will cost AT LEAST $200billion, if not more.

You left out the word nasa after "Any."

Zubrin says 30 billion would do a Mars Direct, who are you to differ so widely?
An anti-human spaceflight robotocist?
^
//^\\
~~~ near space elevator ~~~~
~~~members.aol.com/beanstalkr/~~~
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) Stuf4 Space Shuttle 150 July 28th 04 07:30 AM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 February 2nd 04 03:33 AM
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane Jacques van Oene Space Shuttle 1 October 15th 03 12:21 AM
Three aerospace innovators Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Orbital Sciences Combine strengths to design and build NASA's Orbital Space Plane Jacques van Oene Space Station 0 October 14th 03 03:31 PM
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide Steven S. Pietrobon Space Shuttle 0 September 12th 03 01:37 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.