|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Status of the Big Bang Cosmology
On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 5:25:34 AM UTC-4, Phillip Helbig---undress to reply wrote:
But in the case of MACHOs, obervations were done which would have detected a significant population, if such a population did exist. ---------------------------------------- Those research scientists without a hidden or overt agenda will inform Helbig that a significant population of MACHOs was found. Those who actually do microlensing research argue about the size of the MACHO population, its composition, and its potential contribution to the DM. Few objective scientists would try to tell us that it has been empirically demonstrated that MACHOs do not exist. If our assumptions about galactic models, DM spatial distributions, DM velocity distributions, etc., contain errors or unexpected surprises (as is the usual case in fundamental physics) then the MACHO candidacy might have to be radically re-evaluated. Compare this status with that of WIMPs: nothing, nothing, nothing, hint-oops-nothing, nothing, nothing, hint-oops-nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, nothing, hint-oops-nothing, ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Status of the Big Bang Cosmology | Robert L. Oldershaw | Research | 5 | April 26th 14 09:13 AM |
Challenge to Big Bang cosmology | David Crawford | Astronomy Misc | 5 | April 12th 07 01:27 AM |
Big Bang Cosmology | [email protected] | Misc | 8 | March 29th 07 05:35 PM |
Evidence keeps coming in for Big Bang cosmology | Wally Anglesea™ | Misc | 9 | April 8th 06 03:23 AM |
is there a center to the Big Bang cosmology? | Mad Scientist | Misc | 12 | August 27th 04 12:08 AM |