|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
If all the "Ice Sheets Melt", no one within this anti-think-tank of
Usenet denial will actually care, the rich will simply get a whole lot richer and Earth will become less populated. That's an atheist faith- based sort of holy grail win-win for their good old status quo naysay gipper. Since Venus, Sirius, our moon's L1, the moving of our moon to Earth's L1, the regular laws of physics and of the best available science is still so taboo/nondisclosure and/or topic off-limits, whereas I thought I'd share a little something other that's warm and fuzzy from the honest beer keg wisdom of "G=EMC^2 Glazier". What if NASA and Eclipse / What if Milky Way Core Eclipse On May 15, 3:49 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: That's the biggest eclipse,and we have to look along its plane than we are blocked by its massive very bright hub(core) We can't see that there is a star on the other side that has a blue marble planet. They can't see us, nor will there be a time we can send radio waves across this Black hole hub. It is a mutual blind spot. Mother nature does not want humankind to have company. Beeert That's a perfectly good enough way to look at it. After all, if we actually knew of another universe like ours, or even of an intelligent life capable other planet, we'd most likely want to dominate it and/or we'd simply pillage, plunder, rape and nuke it for all it's worth (pretty much exactly like we're doing to Earth), and then some. If a super black hole of creation produced our vast Universe, then as such there has to be at least that one other universe that shot out the other pole. At least that's the required reaction of known physics that has to coexist, or else we're down to the Atheist worthy singular implosion that doesn't make any sense whatsoever. In our own back yard, Mars is still a totally weird little planet that simply doesn't have the salt that it takes, as for being a certified member planet from the same origin as Earth (one of us doesn't fit the mold), yet there's still no other contributed arguments pertaining to that little matter of fact. In fact, Venus along with it's rather newish planetology worth of substantial geothermal energy loss, of 20.5 w/m2 being a good 256 fold greater than Earth, is anything but from the same realm of planetary creation as Earth or Mars. Our physically dark moon is still a whole lot saltier than can be explained by way of anything NASA/Apollo, and yet that too is of a taboo/nondisclosure topic rating, as are those naked anticathode matters of gamma and hard-Xrays, along with the planet Venus and a few other missing items that a given unfiltered Kodak FOV by rights and within film dynamic range should have recorded. We're so used to being screwed over by our own kind, but has Usenet's bone gone soft on us? I was just wondering about this lack of bone because, as for the fence jumping atheistic sort of borg like collective they are, going with the flow of the winning side regardless of whatever moral issues, and as usual without a speck of remorse, seems to have been what their usual Old Testament thumping past has always been associated with. Their being naysay as to anything that's off-world intelligent is also another rather odd trademark that's associated with their flavor of 'show me the money' atheism. Much like our badly failing environment, evolution mutations of what I perceive as the lost of nifty attributes, and/or of mostly negative going DNA/RNA attributes, has currently been the accepted if not the cultivated norm of atheism (no wonder the honestly faith based alternatives are so much smarter and otherwise open to other interpretations). In the ideal terrestrial limited and thus skewed science and conditional physics world of Usenet Atheism, whereas in order to out-live one another, all it takes is loot and 100 fold more energy to burn than others are getting access to. Being educated as dumb and dumber so that you can be formally snookered and most easily dumbfounded past the point of no return is still a good part of their mainstream status quo, of having learned from whatever's the best hype and conjecture worth of eye candy and orchestrated infomercial science, and otherwise from whatever their conditional physics has to offer is an accepted moral past, present and future, of where the ends justify the means of collateral damage and the carnage of the innocent. In Usenet Naysay Land: All of the sudden, it's becoming perfectly OK that we haven't actually walked on the moon. How odd. All of the sudden, life on planets and even a few moons (including our moon) that are clearly worse off than Venus is becoming humanly doable, and somehow worthy of our spending those hard earned billions upon billions (actually it has become trillions), as in no big freaking deal. How odd. All of the sudden it's perfectly OK that there have been far better than nuclear energy options, as long as we don't ever talk about investing or much less utilizing such, or much less share a good word on behalf of the secondary benefits of having this spare clean energy as for creating Lh2 and h2o2. Since the regular physics of our very own moon or of any such orbital mascon related issue is taboo, thereby our best terrestrial science of planetology still hasn't an honest physics clue as to why Earth has been getting hotter, and that too is OK by usenet standards as long as your two feet arnt getting too wet or too hot and you can afford whatever's the cost of energy, along with the cost of storm recovery or whatever's the spendy task of relocation. Public supercomputers of the necessary complex 3D orbital, of substantial tether loading and of complex lithobraking/impact simulation capability are still being kept off-limits, as per remaining taboo/nondisclosure rated. Folks in charge, like so many others claiming to know all there is to know, as such still can't manage to lift an honest science or physics finger unless it's on behalf of polishing something worthy of their atheism that's rather oddly Old Testament and thus in one way or another Jewish worthy (because that's where most all the serious loot currently is). WWIII over global energy domination is just a touch of two buttons away, is apparently no big deal in the bigoted eyes of these atheistic fence jumpers that are going over to whichever's the winning side anyway. All of the sudden it's becoming an accepted matter of fact that 99.9% of Usenet's status quo naysayism is actually white and/or Jewish to boot. I'd ask for an ethnic and/or faith-based showing of hands, but that too would be against the best wishes of these status quo rusemasters, that as incest cloned borgs prefer to remain as cloak and dagger spooks and moles that have no intentions of ever constructively contributing to any given topic that's not already scripted within their koran. Apparently, being an Atheist in denial is equal to being a born-again liar, because they always get to pick and choose the winning side, including as often as that side changes hand or of taking whichever mindset that so happens to suit whatever ulterior motive or hidden agenda that needs the most butt protecting or vote getting, making their fence jumping religion of Atheism the all around best choice of science and physics that hasn't a stitch of remorse to lose. - Brad Guth |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
In article .com,
BradGuth wrote: Public supercomputers of the necessary complex 3D orbital, of substantial tether loading and of complex lithobraking/impact simulation capability are still being kept off-limits, as per remaining taboo/nondisclosure rated. AstroGrav Brad. Still scared to download and test your own hypothesis? -- COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command). Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
In article .com,
gb6726 wrote: 20 Global Cooling Inventions. www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm (still under editing) Get help. Psychiatric help... -- COOSN-174-07-82116: Official Science Team mascot and alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command). Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article .com, gb6726 wrote: 20 Global Cooling Inventions. www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm (still under editing) Get help. Psychiatric help... As far as I'm aware, there are no diagnostic tests in psychology, except one that is claimed to be weakly diagnostic. And there are no precise definitions of mental health either. What a psychologist gets out of the ink-blot test is what they brought in. cam.misc cut Cheers, Rich |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
BradGuth wrote:
Our physically dark moon Still spreading this lie, Vern? -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum." -- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief "Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and ice cold beer." -- Brad Guth, bigoted racist "You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco." --Kali, quoted endlessly by David Tholen as evidence of "something" |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
On May 19, 11:22 am, gb6726 wrote:
20 Global Cooling Inventions. www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm (still under editing) Moving our moon out to Earth's L1 still isn't one of those inventions. At least my invention for cooling off mother Earth would actually work, and then some. I even know of how to accomplish the daunting task of moving that big old nasty and still somewhat salty damn moon of ours. - Brad Guth |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
BradGuth wrote:
On May 19, 11:22 am, gb6726 wrote: 20 Global Cooling Inventions. www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm (still under editing) Moving our moon out to Earth's L1 still isn't one of those inventions. At least my invention for cooling off mother Earth would actually work, and then some. I even know of how to accomplish the daunting task of moving that big old nasty and still somewhat salty damn moon of ours. Changing the zoning laws? Cheers, Rich - Brad Guth |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
On 6 May, 01:26, Phineas T Puddleduck
wrote: In article .com, BradGuth wrote: or is your wizardly planetology still taboo/nondisclosure rated? Physics isn't stuffed in a box under some asshole's desk. It is available for all to use as seen fit. And obviously you and others of your naysay kind see fit to not use anything that rocks your good and mostly Jewish ship USS LOLLIPOP. Racist, bigoted and stupid too. -- Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within the Coffee Boy singularity. COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken of the saucerhead high command). Sacred keeper of the space between your ears, Puddle Duck! THINK! -- 'foolsrushin'. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
How much global warming(GW) is our local mascon good for?
On May 20, 10:18 am, Rich wrote:
BradGuth wrote: On May 19, 11:22 am, gb6726 wrote: 20 Global Cooling Inventions. www.geocities.com/gmbajszar/index.htm (still under editing) Moving our moon out to Earth's L1 still isn't one of those inventions. At least my invention for cooling off mother Earth would actually work, and then some. I even know of how to accomplish the daunting task of moving that big old nasty and still somewhat salty damn moon of ours. Changing the zoning laws? The local space between us and our sun is already zoned as moon or whatever satellite worthy. Therefore, it's more of a change of local property usage application. Utilizing our moon for other than continually lying our NASA/Apollo butts off about, as such seems like a perfectly solid win-win for the old gipper, called mother Earth. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A few good things can come from a local blackout | TBerk | Amateur Astronomy | 6 | February 1st 07 07:49 AM |
dinosaur extinction/global cooling &human extinction/global warming | 281979 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 06 01:05 PM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |
Are Cities Changing Local and Global Climates? | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | December 11th 03 04:42 PM |