|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tumbling Venus -- equation needed
Hi all, back on 2-Sep-2011 I posted a speculation of Venus's rotation
titled "Tumbling Venus" (copied at bottom). As the Sun's magnetic field has recently flipped, I'm reminded of the topic. The Earth's magnetic field also flips every half-million years or so, and this is presumably caused by the Earth's rotating inner core physically flipping over and so turning the other way. I suspect a battery action where electromagnetic energy builds up in the outer (non-rotating) core until the force is so great as to impel the inner (rotating) core to flip over -- then the built up energy drives the inner core to rotate faster until the stored forces are consumed and then it starts to build up with the opposite polarity, and so on, ad rotundum. My speculation on Venus is that the Venusian core comprises most of the mass and inertia of the planet, so that when the time comes for its (slowly-rotating) core to flip, it is the crust which flips and not the core. Now in between such flips, the Venusian crust becomes tidally locked to the Sun (the Venusian day has been measured to be lengthening by 15 minutes in just the last few decades), so just prior to the flip it will have a siderial day of 224.7 Earth-days equal to its year. When the flip happens, since it is the crust that flips, its siderial day would be 224.7 days going the other way, minus a certain loss caused by the energy of the flip -- that is, some rotational inertia is lost in the flip. This is the equation that I need. I've got an impressive retinue of reference books, but they don't say what happens when you take a rotating sphere or spherical shell, and flip it upside-down. How much rotational speed is lost in the process? Wondering if anyone's encountered such an equation. Thanks, Eric Flesch When considering tumbling planets, we usually think of Uranus which rolls along its orbit like a ball. However, this was surely due to a primordial impact, because Uranus's moons' orbits are aligned with its equator. Uranus has not truly tumbled. A truly tumbled planet is Venus, and there is strong evidence for a remarkable transformation. The evidence is (1) Venus's siderial rotational period which is close to its orbital period, although retrograde. (2) Venus's axial tilt almost perfectly 90 degrees to the ecliptic. These conditions can be replicated using a simple model. Suppose Venus was a tidally bound planet, always showing the same face to the Sun. In that scenario, both of the above conditions are required. Now apply a force to turn Venus neatly upside-down. Observe the rotation must slow slightly, similar to if you perform this action on a top -- there is some dissipation of the rotational inertia. The result: Venus as it is today. Of course, one could question where such a force could come from. However, planets of our size are modelled to have a core which can rotate differently than the mantle. We don't know what Venus's core is doing. Earth's geologic record shows that our magnetic pole periodically flips, and this is almost certainly related to what the core is doing. Why should the core flip? We know nothing about the process, but we can infer that it happens. If Venus has a large core, heavier than the mantle, then when the core flips, it will be the mantle which flips. And that would explain the Venus that we see today. Eric Flesch |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Equation of time: need the equation itself | [email protected] | Misc | 1 | March 10th 05 05:02 AM |
NOAA 7 tumbling | William R. Thompson | Satellites | 2 | February 13th 04 04:04 PM |
Tumbling Iridiums | William C. Keel | Satellites | 0 | August 13th 03 07:15 PM |
Is Nimbus 7 tumbling? | William R. Thompson | Satellites | 0 | August 2nd 03 10:03 AM |
Equation of Time formula needed | Rick Mintz | Misc | 2 | July 10th 03 07:57 AM |