![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All Einsteinians know that Einstein's relativity is false:
"Was Einstein wrong? At least in his understanding of time, Smolin argues, the great theorist of relativity was dead wrong. What is worse, by firmly enshrining his error in scientific orthodoxy, Einstein trapped his successors in insoluble dilemmas..." https://www.amazon.com/Time-Reborn-C.../dp/B00AEGQPFE What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... [...] The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..." https://www.edge.org/response-detail/25477 "[George] Ellis is up against one of the most successful theories in physics: special relativity. It revealed that there's no such thing as objective simultaneity. [...] Rescuing an objective "now" is a daunting task." https://www.newscientist.com/article...wards-in-time/ "...says John Norton, a philosopher based at the University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Norton is hesitant to express it, but his instinct - and the consensus in physics - seems to be that space and time exist on their own. The trouble with this idea, though, is that it doesn't sit well with relativity, which describes space-time as a malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter." https://www.newscientist.com/article...-universe-tick Joao Magueijo: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time..." https://youtu.be/kbHBBtsrU1g?t=1431 "You want to go back to a notion of space-time that preceded the 20th century, and it wants to ignore the essential lessons about space-time that the 20th century has taught us." Joao Magueijo: "Yes, that's right. So it's nouveau-Newtonian." At 53:29 he http://pirsa.org/displayFlash.php?id=16060116 Joao Magueijo: "Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL WAS CLEARLY SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity. And all denied the possibility of establishing a well-defined border, common to all observers, capable of containing new quantum gravitational effects." Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250 http://www.amazon.com/Faster-Than-Sp.../dp/0738205257 "...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/sc...-relative.html The metastases of Einstein's false constant-speed-of-light postulate, the original malignancy in fundamental physics, turned this branch of science into an insane ideology. Nowadays "physics is dead" is getting more and more explicit, and although the death is still not blamed on Einstein, Einsteinians don't feel safe anymore and silently leave the sinking ship: http://c6.quickcachr.fotos.sapo.pt/i...2108_dBrrH.png Soon "the embarrassing question" will have to be answered: "This paper investigates an alternative possibility: that the critics were right and that the success of Einstein's theory in overcoming them was due to its strengths as an ideology rather than as a science. The clock paradox illustrates how relativity theory does indeed contain inconsistencies that make it scientifically problematic. These same inconsistencies, however, make the theory ideologically powerful. [...] The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier. Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting their opponents out of professional discourse. [...] The triumph of relativity theory represents the triumph of ideology not only in the profession of physics bur also in the philosophy of science." Peter Hayes, The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox https://www.researchgate.net/publica..._Clock_Paradox Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light."x http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/31/sc...-relative.html
Great, physicists need to get rid of any falsehood, but in this particular case things are complicated, to say the least: "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we [Niayesh Afshordi and Joao Magueijo] had to find ways to change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/a...t-speed-slowed Awful dilemma, isn't it? In this tweet I tried to describe Afshordi's and Magueijo's plight as clearly as possible: https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev/st...89439147859970 The tweet received a like from... Niayesh Afshordi! Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why Einsteinians Leave the Sinking Ship | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 2nd 17 01:15 PM |
Einsteiniana: Profiteers Leave the Sinking Ship | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 9th 16 09:28 AM |
EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 4th 14 12:29 PM |
HOW EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 17th 14 07:05 PM |
EINSTEINIANS LEAVE THE SINKING SHIP | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 4 | March 31st 14 06:46 PM |