#1
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
Folks,
I've been trying to see the Helix with a 120mm refractor and no luck under mag 4.5 skies and Deep Sky filter. Would a OIII or UHC do the job? NS. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
In article ,
Neal Shepard wrote: Folks, I've been trying to see the Helix with a 120mm refractor and no luck under mag 4.5 skies and Deep Sky filter. Would a OIII or UHC do the job? NS. I need a UHC filter on my 152mm refractor, from urban skies. Even then, it is fairly faint. In an 18" with a UHC and dark skies, it's one of the prettiest thing up there....... Starry Skies, Rich |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
I have just barely seen the Helix in 16x70 binoculars in my 4.5 backyard =
skies. (I've seen it many times with the 16x70 as well as 10x42 binos = from darksky sites.) Through my 10" f/5 dob at a darksky site i prefer = the view without a filter. I have a UHC. The Helix is fairly large but = very low surface brightness. I usually detect it by slowly panning back = and forth over the field. -Florian Palm Springs, Calif. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
Florian stepped back from the eyepiece and screamed:
The Helix is fairly large but very low surface brightness. I usually detect it by slowly panning back and forth over the field. Correctimundo. I remember looking for it a long time and actually having_parts_of it in the FOV without knowing it. For me, the trick is to use averted vision while panning the scope back and forth. This is easier said than done ;o) Martin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
It shows up well in my 11x80 binocs as a dim round patch. The central
hole doesn't really show. The panning back and forth suggestion is a good one. Marty |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
"Neal Shepard" wrote in message ... Folks, I've been trying to see the Helix with a 120mm refractor and no luck under mag 4.5 skies and Deep Sky filter. I saw it the other night with 8x42 binoculars at my light-polluted home (NELM about 5.3). I've seen it many times with binoculars at dark-sky sites. It's *faint* and fairly large -- a lump in the sky. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
Does it show up better in binoculars?
I didn't think it would be visible without filters in mag 5 skies. Its gonna be clear so I'll try it. Thanks, NS |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
Does it show up better in binoculars?
From a dark site, it's easiest to spot in my 16x70mm binoculars. -Florian |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
"Neal Shepard" wrote in message ... Does it show up better in binoculars? I didn't think it would be visible without filters in mag 5 skies. Its gonna be clear so I'll try it. You have to know what to look for. It does not look like a great big doughnut. It's a totally shapeless patch where the sky background is slightly lighter than elsewhere. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Helix Nebula
Does it show up better in binoculars?
For me it does. A wide field helps put more dark sky around it so that you can see the contrast. Look for a patch of sky that isn't as dark as the sky around it. Marty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helix Nebula | Isabella | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 10th 04 10:24 PM |
Outer Space/NASA Pictures | . | Space Station | 0 | September 8th 03 04:03 PM |
Outer Space Pictures | . | Space Station | 0 | September 8th 03 03:51 PM |
Chandra reveals X-ray flow in Horseshoe Nebula (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 20th 03 01:11 AM |
Whats in the sky today | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | July 14th 03 04:24 AM |