|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
And exactly how do you investigate something when you have no leads, no evidence, no indications? Well first a directy visual inspection is in order. When something unexplained occurs do you?? A wait for a disaster or B investigate all likely possibilties? Looks like management is waiting for whatever to crap out completely. thats fine if its a ventilation fan with a loose retainer screw. but what if this noise is a symptom of a kliller issue? Ahh DONT answer now! But be aware if something really bad occurs it will appear careless, just like the foam shedding. We really dont understand and know exactly why the foam is shedding but its no biggie We really didnt know what caused the noise but felt it wasnt a biggie. The post mrtem of another disaster with the possiblity of a out of contol ISS deorbit isnt good PR. If the area in question was worth the time and trouble of a look see on the time shortened spacewalk its worth going back out soon to complete that walk and other unfinished spacewalk activities. Why go take a look at all? There is no evidence, no symptoms, no leads, no indications, no nothing. EXCUSE ME theres that unknown noise! That audio evidence of SOMETHING not right. How hard is this to understand? D. OBVIOUSLY VERY HARD FOR YOU! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
You see folks (bob) advocating exactly that. It's them I'm trying to reach, not you or Herb. (Who mostly know these things.) Panicking is hearing one noise and rushing out the airlock! Prudent investigation isnt having the look see cut from one space walk for good reason then waiting 4 or 5 months. Thats like accepting foam shedding as a benoolvent nuisance. IN ANY CASE a mike should be left iopen 24/7 in that area to help diagnose this noise if it occurs again/ A audio recording would be very helpful. You folks sadly come from the linda ham school of safety Ahh dont worry about it Hey this is my opinion |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
Thats like accepting foam shedding as a benoolvent nuisance.
Had been all that's done, you'd have a point. But as usual, you remain willfully ignorant. NASA accepted it as a maintenance issue only. thats a fact of life. Hey this is my opinion |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
No. I come from a school of safety as hard and as stern as any astronaut has ever encountered. I know about these things *because I have lived them*, not just sat in an armchair like you. well since your part of that nasa group your also likely part of the failed safety culture. Hey this is my opinion |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
It's equally a fact of life that such an acceptance *wasn't* done in the current investigation. True of course with the crew dead, and the orbiter destroyed it would be kinda difficult to call foam shedding a maintenance issue. espically after seeing what foam shedding can do to the leading edge Hey this is my opinion |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
A direct visual inspection of what? Remember we have no idea currently what caused the sound. No they should be looking at the outside, and recording all sounds in the area in case it reoccurs, which it did. Big problems almost invariably leave a trace of their existence. The sound didn't. WHEN will the trace evidence be in? As long as its not a show stopper thats ok. Hey foam loss isnt a problem since it hasnt caused one yet Hey the noise isnt a problem since it hasnt caused one yet/ Hey the o ring burn thru isnt a problem since it hasnt caused one yet Hey this is my opinion |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Monitoring ISS Air-to-Ground
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
System to monitor heat panels could safeguard future spacecraft (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Space Shuttle | 0 | July 15th 04 06:14 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 20-02-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | February 21st 04 02:59 PM |
ISS On-Orbit Status, 11-01-2004 | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | January 12th 04 10:35 AM |
Pressure monitoring in station | BigSkier | Space Station | 2 | December 1st 03 04:19 PM |
WashPost: “Space Station Mission Opposed” | James Oberg | Space Station | 3 | October 23rd 03 01:10 PM |