Global Warming Climate Models Have Made a Successful Prediction

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:49:31 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 10:25:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:47:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:50:23 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

One can fly on jets and drive a gasoline car while seeking legislative
solutions to global warming. That doesn't make a person a hypocrite.

In fact, it DOES make a person a hypocrite. One can seek "legislative solutions" while already having a low CO2 footprint by not flying or driving.

We operate within the system we live in. There are many things I would
change. Private ownership of land.

No one is forcing you to own land, peterson.

As noted, I- like any reasonable person-

You are definitely NOT a reasonable person, peterson

will operate within the
framework of the laws and customs of society. Your "go live in a cave"
mentality is showing again.

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

Where did I suggest you go live in a cave? Show exactly where I ever said that.

You suggest it all the time. But because you don't understand the
concept of metaphorical speech, you're too stupid to even realize it.

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 11:13:08 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 19:49:31 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 at 10:25:03 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 13:47:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:50:23 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 09:45:04 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

One can fly on jets and drive a gasoline car while seeking legislative
solutions to global warming. That doesn't make a person a hypocrite.

In fact, it DOES make a person a hypocrite. One can seek "legislative solutions" while already having a low CO2 footprint by not flying or driving.

We operate within the system we live in. There are many things I would
change. Private ownership of land.

No one is forcing you to own land, peterson.

As noted, I- like any reasonable person-

You are definitely NOT a reasonable person, peterson

will operate within the
framework of the laws and customs of society. Your "go live in a cave"
mentality is showing again.

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

Where did I suggest you go live in a cave? Show exactly where I ever said that.

You suggest it all the time.

You are evading the question. Give an example where I suggested you live in a cave, peterson. I did suggest you live in a simple apartment. Maybe you do not know the difference between an apartment and a cave?


But because you don't understand the
concept of metaphorical speech, you're too stupid to even realize it.

I'm not using any metaphors here. So when I suggest you live in a small apartment in a city in order to curb your CO2 emissions, I am offering you serious advice, which you should take seriously.

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned. There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.


Where did I suggest you go live in a cave? Show exactly where I ever said that.

You suggest it all the time.

You are evading the question. Give an example where I suggested you live in a cave, peterson.

The stupid burns in this one.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:19:50 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned.

Except for land owned by governments.

There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.

You said there was a law forcing you to own land, peterson. Show us that law.


Where did I suggest you go live in a cave? Show exactly where I ever said that.

You suggest it all the time.

You are evading the question. Give an example where I suggested you live in a cave, peterson.

The stupid burns in this one.

Obviously, you have no examples of my suggesting that you live in a cave, peterson.

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:19:50 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned.

Except for land owned by governments.

And how do you suggest I settle myself on such land? The system does
not allow for it.

There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.

You said there was a law forcing you to own land, peterson. Show us that law.

The point is, someone has to own the land I live on. That's how the
system is set up.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:19:50 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned.

Except for land owned by governments.

And how do you suggest I settle myself on such land? The system does
not allow for it.

Where did I suggest that you try to live on government land?

There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.

You said there was a law forcing you to own land, peterson. Show us that law.

The point is, someone has to own the land I live on. That's how the
system is set up.

No, that is not the point. You indicated that there is a law forcing you to own land, peterson.

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:37:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:19:50 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned.

Except for land owned by governments.

And how do you suggest I settle myself on such land? The system does
not allow for it.

Where did I suggest that you try to live on government land?

Again, where do you suggest I live if not on private land?

There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.

You said there was a law forcing you to own land, peterson. Show us that law.

The point is, someone has to own the land I live on. That's how the
system is set up.

No, that is not the point. You indicated that there is a law forcing you to own land, peterson.

And I clarified my point. But you're too intellectually dishonest to
take that and work with it.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 10:53:39 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:37:49 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:32:17 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 06:26:59 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 9:19:50 AM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Is there some law or custom that forces you to own land, peterson?

Yes.

What happens when you disobey it, peterson? Is it a local, state or federal law?

How is it even possible for me to "disobey" it? Land is privately
owned.

Except for land owned by governments.

And how do you suggest I settle myself on such land? The system does
not allow for it.

Where did I suggest that you try to live on government land?

Again, where do you suggest I live if not on private land?

On private land, just not land that YOU own.

There's nothing I can do about that (other than advocate for a
change... which is unlikely to happen). It makes no difference if I
personally own land or not. I have to live on land, and someone is
going to own it.

You said there was a law forcing you to own land, peterson. Show us that law.

The point is, someone has to own the land I live on. That's how the
system is set up.

No, that is not the point. You indicated that there is a law forcing you to own land, peterson.

And I clarified my point. But you're too intellectually dishonest to
take that and work with it.

You miss the point, which is that you have claimed that there is a law forcing you to own land. Show us that law.

On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Again, where do you suggest I live if not on private land?

On private land, just not land that YOU own.

So like I said, you entirely miss the point. It is the concept of
privately owned land I disagree with. Not who happens to own it.

You miss the point, which is that you have claimed that there is a law forcing you to own land. Show us that law.

The stupid. It burns.

On Thursday, August 18, 2016 at 12:46:12 PM UTC-4, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:23:42 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

Again, where do you suggest I live if not on private land?

On private land, just not land that YOU own.

So like I said, you entirely miss the point. It is the concept of
privately owned land I disagree with. Not who happens to own it.

No, the point of this discussion is for you to identify the -law- that you claim forces you to own real estate.

As for your "point," if you dislike the idea of owning land, then don't own any.

You miss the point, which is that you have claimed that there is a law forcing you to own land. Show us that law.

The stupid. It burns.

Yes, you ARE stupid, peterson. But it's hard to care.