|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
On Mar 9, 8:11 pm, shuba wrote:
Space can also be curved in general relativity. Curved space is an important idea in cosmology. The Friedmann equations, which are solutions to the field equations of relativity, have a term normally denoted as 'k' whose value depends on whether three-dimensional space is flat, positively curved, or negatively curved. The FLRW metric, as one of the infinite solutions to the field equations, exhibits the following spacetime where it does not even satisfy the Newtonian law of gravity at weaker expansions. ** ds^2 = c^2 dt^2 – Q(t) (dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2) Where ** Q(t) = expansion term as a function of time only It is a linear expansion of space. Thus, technically, it does not deal with curvature of space. shrug Also, since it does not satisfy Newtonian law of gravity at short distances, the metric is just garbage. Yes, the field equations are also garbage. shrug There are also vacuum solutions that explain the accelerated expanding universe at cosmic scales while degenerates into Newtonian law of gravity at more humble scale. With that said, there are no solutions that allow flat space with gravitational time dilation. shrug For merely $99,999, yours truly will design a universe with a metric that satisfies as a solution to the field equations according to the laws of your specifications. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
time isn't curved, except by birth & death; that is,
subjectively. no-one knows, whether or not Universe in finite, let alone time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
space is manifestly curved, as shown
by Kepler's three orbital constraints (or Newton's mere algebraization of them). |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
"rasterspace"
who used to be "Spudnick" the Potato head that evoved from "BURT" the BURP aka "Mitch Raemsch" who fashioned himself as "The future of science" that was originally Lyndon LaRouche's roach: "Brian Quincy Hutchings" who wrote: space is manifestly curved, as shown by Kepler's three orbital constraints (or Newton's mere algebraization of them). hanson wrote: .... Brian, even better and more to the point, it's your brain and your mentation that is curved and went around the bend.... ahahaha... ahahahanson |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
"rasterspace"
who used to be "Spudnick" the Potato head that evoved from "BURT" the BURP aka "Mitch Raemsch" who fashioned himself as "The future of science" that was originally Lyndon LaRouche's roach: "Brian Quincy Hutchings" who wrote: time isn't curved, except by birth & death; that is, subjectively. no-one knows, whether or not Universe in finite, let alone time. hanson wrote: Brian, in your world & in your case that may be so. Surely tome is not curved but your mind is. apparently since birth... ahahaha... You are always good for a chuckle... ahahaha... ahahahanson |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Space doesn't curve. But Spacetime Does.
yeah, since I'm typing in this ghetto,
with you, yourself & haha. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if(on the curve) | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 21 | June 29th 09 08:18 AM |
Gravity ,Motion ,Curve Space ,Particle Attraction Push of spaceenergy | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | February 10th 08 06:15 AM |
NASA behind the curve. Again. | Frank | History | 2 | October 13th 07 08:07 AM |
Spin =Inertia Curve space=Gravity | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 4 | January 7th 07 03:32 AM |
What's the name of that curve? | wavefront | Amateur Astronomy | 8 | April 1st 04 01:50 PM |