Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT

In article ,
Art Deco wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

In article ,
Art Deco wrote:


That is one of the stupidest thing you have posted yet. Relativistic =
Coming under the relativity theory.

I'm sure he can come up with even stupider ideas to post.

In the next post as well, probably...

It didn't take long at all, just a few hours.

Surely the rate that this sewage is produced has to slow down sometimes.

--

Saucerhead lingo #2102 "However, since PTP is in reality NOT a budding
astrophysicist..." ... "Perhaps if we try distraction as a tactic people
will forget we cannot answer simple conflicting issues with our nonsense
theory"

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article ,
Art Deco wrote:

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

In article ,
Art Deco wrote:

please tell me this
Wolter guy isn't a market gardener or something cause he's hooked you
saucer heads up with some prime grade nonsense.

So who is this Wolter clown they keep ranting about ad nauseum, anyway?
I'm guessing he must of the same ilk as Beardan and Hoagland.

I can find no papers by a Wolter on any physics search

There's another surprise.

Considering Lindner was an MD, I'm guessing this guy is either a
greengrocer...

--

Saucerhead lingo #2102 "However, since PTP is in reality NOT a budding
astrophysicist..." ... "Perhaps if we try distraction as a tactic people
will forget we cannot answer simple conflicting issues with our nonsense
theory"

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article ,
Art Deco wrote:

I love the "temperature - but not temperature" post. Like their posts,
which are "physics - but not physics"

My favorite the past couple days has to be how they misinterpret
time-varying vector fields as "flow fields" or "fields in motion".

If they didn't misinterpret, they wouldn't interpret at all!

Note how Bill has given up, he's decided discretion is the better part
of valour I think.

--

Saucerhead lingo #2102 "However, since PTP is in reality NOT a budding
astrophysicist..." ... "Perhaps if we try distraction as a tactic people
will forget we cannot answer simple conflicting issues with our nonsense
theory"

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...
Painius wrote:

Did you first become a mother when you we're twelve?

Your latest attempt to lame me just exploded in the barrel, painsnuh.

You're right, Mother... i should stop. I'm actually
feeling guilty because it's so easy to find things
wrong with you. Since you have so much void
empty space between your ears, my trading insults
with you is like dealing with a pointless scorpion.

----------------------------------------------

(sigh) maybe someday you'll read Appendix V and
learn the truth about space, the Universe, and...

real energy and power!

but probably not. You always have your hands full
with the ko0k in the mirror.

Ref.:
RELATIVITY - The Special and the General Theory
Appendix V - Relativity and the Problem of Space
From the Front Cover:
"A Clear Explanation That Anyone Can Understand"

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net

In article
,
"Painius" wrote:

You're right, Mother... i should stop.

But you won't - cause its chides you inside to be so wrong.

I'm actually
feeling guilty because it's so easy to find things
wrong with you. Since you have so much void
empty space between your ears, my trading insults
with you is like dealing with a pointless scorpion.


Even lamer lames. Oh painius, the inanity!

----------------------------------------------

(sigh) maybe someday you'll read Appendix V and
learn the truth about space, the Universe, and...

real energy and power!

Why do all the best kooks feel they have to put words in the mouth of
dead men?


but probably not. You always have your hands full
with the ko0k in the mirror.

Ref.:
RELATIVITY - The Special and the General Theory
Appendix V - Relativity and the Problem of Space
From the Front Cover:
"A Clear Explanation That Anyone Can Understand"


Shame you obviously don't understand relativity, as so ably already
demonstrated by you.


--

Saucerhead lingo #2102 "However, since PTP is in reality NOT a budding
astrophysicist..." ... "Perhaps if we try distraction as a tactic people
will forget we cannot answer simple conflicting issues with our nonsense
theory"

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:

In article
,
"Painius" wrote:



Because I hate seeing nonsense peddled as fact.

So why do *you* think science does this?

Where do I start educating a loon?

boggle

This clown is as delusional as Warhol.

Painius wrote:

"nightbat" wrote in message...
. ..
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
"Painius" wrote:

You have yet to *answer* the hard questions.

Because I hate seeing nonsense peddled as fact.

Thanks for being here, Phineas!

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

nightbat

Officer Painius please don't waste you time on ducky he has shown
his clueless feathers well. Officer Oc is correct you can't reason with a
void spacer. And you whipped him by his own posted statement above,
because this coming from his admitted previous posted preference for
string theory. At least Team Space Flow theory is based on observed
effects and per profound other independent deep theorists while ducky
prefers reliance on absence of evidence String ones, nuff said.

As we enter into the new century, only 100 years from when relativity was
first Dr. Einstein presented, it is fitting that the unified field was
accomplished by men of science like us and not the clueless quacking
duckies. The field is reciprocal to itself (nightbat) and the so called
empty metric spaces within, shell bound, and outside all detectable
energy/mass is part of the field as well.

may the Team force be with us,
the nightbat


Not to be alarmed, sir Night... Phineas was invited
to the round table merely for a chat. He seems to
prefer other dubious geometric shapes. I had hoped
he would sense the gravity flowing into his atoms,
but he obviously prefers to stretch the void within
his 1100cc cranium. (A bit on the low side of the
1000-2000cc range of H. sapiens)

Of course, he'll take that as a cut...

No, it's just another one your lames.

without the
slightest reference to Anatole France.

In all candor, and to his credit, Art Deco has been

*ding*

doing some real scrambling to be able to pass
himself off as an aspiring astrophysics student.

Delusion noted, pseudoscientist.

And i feel it to be no waste, since his parroting
has recently led me down some fascinating lanes.
^^^^^

You misspelled "lames".

However, in deference to you, Captain General, as
you are after all the Senior Research Ranking
officer, and therefore more rank than me, g i
shall endeavor to pursue a more worthy pathway.

slurpy, slurpy.

Wow! my tee-shirt's starting to fade, and you
wouldn't *believe* how much the girls like it!
Lots of nipply rubbin' an' all that!

And nipple rubbin' is reciprocal to itself. ;-P

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Painius wrote:

"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote...
in message ...

Painius There is more empty space in the micro realm than in the macro
realm. Go figure Bert

Yes, however two things, Bert...

1) Is space really empty? in the micro or macro?

"There is no space empty of field."

and...

2) The micro realm *comprises* the macro realm,
so when our minds can combine the two, the amount
of "space as field" in ratio to condensed areas which
manifest as "matter" gives Bill and Wolter's "dust
bunny" description even more impact. Compared
with the uncondensed gravitational energy of space,

...matter (condensed gravitational energy) hardly
even exists!

Pure kook gobble, utterly sans meaning.

Bill Sheppard wrote:

From Painius, replying to Bert:

2) The micro realm *comprises* the
macro realm, so when our minds can
combine the two, the amount of "space
as field" in ratio to condensed areas
which manifest as "matter" gives..
Wolter's "dust bunny" description even
more impact. Compared with the
uncondensed gravitational energy of
space,

Just to clarify, matter (i.e., its atomic structure) does not represent
a condensed (or 'more concentrated') form of space. Rather, matter is
the LEAST concentrated, *least* energy-dense form of space, hence the
'dustbunny' moniker. What we perceive as 'matter' is the spatial flow
DE-concentrating, DE-pressurizing in its accelerating flow into every
atomic nucleus. Matter is the 'venturi effect' of the hyperpressurized
SPED _venting_ to that lowest-pressure 'ground state'.

The Quack-ers oughta have fun with that. Har. (-:
oc

What is funny is that you actually seem to believe this rot.

Painius wrote:

Dissipation is just another word for "conversion",
Mother.

ALL energy boils down to gravitational energy.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

For this deep, profound idea that all forms of energy are
gravitational, combined with his dogged determination to prop up the
flowing space verbal cornucopia despite all evidence to the contrary, I
nominate painsnuh for the Victor Von Frankenstein Weird Science Award,
January 2007.

Any seconds?