#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sidereal Time
I need to caluculate the RA and Dec in J2000 for the zenith at a
specfic latitude and longitude on a specific date, which could be far in the future or past. If anyone can point me to code or psuedo code/formulae that would assist me in this, I would be appreciative. At first blush it seems that I could calculate Local Sidereal Time to get the RA and then calculate the DEC based on the latitude. How would I take precession of the Earth into account though? Ideally I need to to be quite accurate millions or billions of years in the past/future. I appreciate any suggestions. Thanks! Michael Koppelman |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Koppelman wrote:
I need to caluculate the RA and Dec in J2000 for the zenith at a specfic latitude and longitude on a specific date, which could be far in the future or past. If anyone can point me to code or psuedo code/formulae that would assist me in this, I would be appreciative. At first blush it seems that I could calculate Local Sidereal Time to get the RA and then calculate the DEC based on the latitude. How would I take precession of the Earth into account though? Ideally I need to to be quite accurate millions or billions of years in the past/future. This last requirement implies knowing the Earth's angular position (time integral of angular velocity) to high accuracy over long time scales. This is _very_ hard: A major source of the slowing of the Earth's spin rate is friction from tides flowing over shallow seabeds, and the amount of this dissipation depends on the details of the ocean-bottom topography. I have read that calculating this dissipation over time scales of a few _thousands_ of years (to analyze ancient solar-eclipse observations) is already a difficult problem, due to lack of knowledge of the ocean-bottom topography, [or at least the lack of such knowledge that isn't a military secret: the world's navies know a lot about ocean topolgraphy that they don't make public] especially the meter-scale roughness. If I remember correctly, the cumulative tidal-friction dissipation over a few thousand years is already enough to change the Earth's angular position (from what it would have been with a constant angular velocity) by something on the order of 90 degrees. On geological time scales ocean depths, topography, roughness, etc, are all going to change due to continental drift. I don't think there's any practical way of calculating this. ciao, -- -- "Jonathan Thornburg (remove -animal to reply)" Max-Planck-Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut), Golm, Germany, "Old Europe" http://www.aei.mpg.de/~jthorn/home.html "Washing one's hands of the conflict between the powerful and the powerless means to side with the powerful, not to be neutral." -- quote by Freire / poster by Oxfam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Koppelman skrev:
I need to caluculate the RA and Dec in J2000 for the zenith at a specfic latitude and longitude on a specific date, which could be far in the future or past. If anyone can point me to code or psuedo code/formulae that would assist me in this, I would be appreciative. At first blush it seems that I could calculate Local Sidereal Time to get the RA and then calculate the DEC based on the latitude. How would I take precession of the Earth into account though? Have a look at http://www.iers.org/iers/publications/tn/tn32/ Chapter 5.10 shows you how to transform from the Terrestial Reference System to the Celestial Reference System using the given fortran routines. Ideally I need to to be quite accurate millions or billions of years in the past/future. I doubt even millions of years are possible, although this depends on your definition of quite accurate. [Mod. note: MIME-damage fixed up -- it's hard on people whose names contain non-ASCII characters, but please post in plain ASCII if you can -- mjh] -- Oeystein Olsen, oystein.olsen_at_astro.uio.no, http://folk.uio.no/oeysteio Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, http://www.astro.uio.no University of Oslo, Norway |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Koppelman wrote:
Ideally I need to to be quite accurate millions or billions of years in the past/future. Impossible. This would mean that we can know exactly all forces and all masses in the solar system. The solar system is chaotic. The orbit of the earth is chaotic. You can't go forward/backward billions of years. See http://members.fortunecity.com/templarser/solarsys.html http://www.imcce.fr/Equipes/ASD/prep...002_laskar.pdf http://www.physics.uoguelph.ca/summe...es/scor208.htm and many others |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the replies, everyone! I am learning a lot as I research
this. I have code that calculates precession, nutation and annular aberration but it it based on knowing certain values at certain epochs. It seems my accuracy is going to be limited by the oldest date that we know some of those values. Cheers, Michael |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA HISTORY COMPUTER STOLDEN --- UNIVERSAL DATABASE ON A CHIP .... | zetasum | History | 1 | February 19th 05 06:08 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | Space Station | 0 | February 4th 05 11:10 PM |
Can't get out of the universe "My crew will blow it up"!!!!!!!!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 4th 05 11:06 PM |
CRACK THIS CODE!!! WHY DID IT HAPPEN READ THIS DISTRUCTION!!!! | zetasum | History | 0 | February 3rd 05 12:28 AM |