|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
How many astrobiologists are among you?
I'm not asking for "papers", now, I'm only asking how many of you are interested in biology with an astronomy "twist"? (I wonder why the sf writers settled upon "astrobiology" instead of bioastronomy?) Darwin's works explained how life evolved, but those ideas fairly well begin with the first single cell and go on from there. Neo-Darwinists have in some cases gone back a bit farther to try to explain how the cell itself evolved. How did the nucleus, with its nucleic acid in highly organised form, evolve? How did other cell constituents evolve, such as vacuoles, and especially mitochondria. A human cell can contain hundreds of these tiny mitochondria, each with a very different organisation of nucleic acid, very different from the nucleic acid in the cell's nucleus, and each mitochondrium passes to offspring from the mother. Your biologists have noted how closely the advancement of the embryo and fetus matches the accepted track of evolution. However, most of these studies, similar to Darwin's, begin with a single cell, one from the male and one from the female. From this point, the point of "fertilisation", your science has made some most profound discovery. In order, though, to find out more about how the very first cell came about, perhaps it would be helpful if more studies were performed in the areas of the male and female organs that actually manufacture the reproductive cells? Find out the details about how these organs do their jobs, and you might learn a bit more about the evolution of the cell, especially if focus is maintained on the initial construction of the CELL MEMBRANE. What does this have to do with astronomy? Everything ultimately has something to do with astronomy. And THAT'S why sf writers settled upon "astrobiology", because astronomy was, is and always will be "The First Science". -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
On Dec 15, 12:29*am, "Darla" wrote:
(I wonder why the sf writers settled upon "astrobiology" instead of bioastronomy?) N O I T A M R O F N I |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
On Dec 15, 12:29*am, "Darla" wrote:
How many astrobiologists are among you? I'm not asking for "papers", now, I'm only asking how many of you are interested in biology with an astronomy "twist"? nightbat Our Queen you must know by now the nightbat's far advanced Red Halo explained and pointed to the true most likely evolution of life on Earth. Darla (I wonder why the sf writers settled upon "astrobiology" instead of bioastronomy?) nightbat Fact is stranger then fiction. there is no non man originating biology in space that humans know of. Darla Darwin's works explained how life evolved, but those ideas fairly well begin with the first single cell and go on from there. Neo-Darwinists have in some cases gone back a bit farther to try to explain how the cell itself evolved. How did the nucleus, with its nucleic acid in highly organised form, evolve? How did other cell constituents evolve, such as vacuoles, and especially mitochondria. A human cell can contain hundreds of these tiny mitochondria, each with a very different organisation of nucleic acid, very different from the nucleic acid in the cell's nucleus, and each mitochondrium passes to offspring from the mother. nightbat answer Red Halo Darla Your biologists have noted how closely the advancement of the embryo and fetus matches the accepted track of evolution. However, most of these studies, similar to Darwin's, begin with a single cell, one from the male and one from the female. From this point, the point of "fertilisation", your science has made some most profound discovery. In order, though, to find out more about how the very first cell came about, perhaps it would be helpful if more studies were performed in the areas of the male and female organs that actually manufacture the reproductive cells? Find out the details about how these organs do their jobs, and you might learn a bit more about the evolution of the cell, especially if focus is maintained on the initial construction of the CELL MEMBRANE. nightbat The solution to life on Earth was presented by humble nightbat many net years ago. I do not rest on my laurals however for I Team help push the dark superstitions and fears away so that humans can hopefully advance. Darla What does this have to do with astronomy? Everything ultimately has something to do with astronomy. And THAT'S why sf writers settled upon "astrobiology", because astronomy was, is and always will be "The First Science". -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! nightbat True science advances with the death of outdated old proved false unfounded ideas. at your service, the nightbat |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
Darla Have been studying and day dreaming on the "membrane" I will post
on it shortly. Can start with the surface tension of water as the area of first reproducing molecules(strands of life) A floating bubble has a lot to tell. Bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
nightbat life in the universe I have us as "conscious observers" That to
me s profound I have the universe as 22 billion years old. It needed this time for gravity to evolve conscious life(us,and seans) The universe can now see itself for it has eyes,and large brains. Thinking life needs to have great complexity.(we are star stuff) I am practically taking this thinking from the "anthropic principle". I am leaving out lots of good science to shorten my points. Reality is if the universe did not have the right stuff,we could not be here to see it. Life got the right environment to evolve(Earth). The oboe comes to mind when I think of fine tuned Call this post universe "fine tuned for conscious life." Bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
wrote in message ... On Dec 15, 12:29 am, "Darla" wrote: How many astrobiologists are among you? I'm not asking for "papers", now, I'm only asking how many of you are interested in biology with an astronomy "twist"? nightbat Our Queen you must know by now the nightbat's far advanced Red Halo explained and pointed to the true most likely evolution of life on Earth. For those, like me, who are unfamiliar with the details of the Nightbat Red Halo explanation for the most likely evolution of life on Earth, perhaps you would be willing to elaborate? Remember that when you last expounded in detail on your Red Halo and Black Comet, it was before I had come along. Darla (I wonder why the sf writers settled upon "astrobiology" instead of bioastronomy?) nightbat Fact is stranger then fiction. there is no non man originating biology in space that humans know of. Humans will learn, and soon, very soon. Darla Darwin's works explained how life evolved, but those ideas fairly well begin with the first single cell and go on from there. Neo-Darwinists have in some cases gone back a bit farther to try to explain how the cell itself evolved. How did the nucleus, with its nucleic acid in highly organised form, evolve? How did other cell constituents evolve, such as vacuoles, and especially mitochondria. A human cell can contain hundreds of these tiny mitochondria, each with a very different organisation of nucleic acid, very different from the nucleic acid in the cell's nucleus, and each mitochondrium passes to offspring from the mother. nightbat answer Red Halo Darla Your biologists have noted how closely the advancement of the embryo and fetus matches the accepted track of evolution. However, most of these studies, similar to Darwin's, begin with a single cell, one from the male and one from the female. From this point, the point of "fertilisation", your science has made some most profound discovery. In order, though, to find out more about how the very first cell came about, perhaps it would be helpful if more studies were performed in the areas of the male and female organs that actually manufacture the reproductive cells? Find out the details about how these organs do their jobs, and you might learn a bit more about the evolution of the cell, especially if focus is maintained on the initial construction of the CELL MEMBRANE. nightbat The solution to life on Earth was presented by humble nightbat many net years ago. I do not rest on my laurals however for I Team help push the dark superstitions and fears away so that humans can hopefully advance. Humans shall continue to advance in technology. The question of whether or not humans will destroy themselves is answered by a simple "Unlikely". Your science is extremely careful with their machines, much more careful even than we were. Humans have had the capability to destroy themselves and all life on Earth for decades. If you haven't done so by this point, either accidently or on purpose, then it is "likely" that humans will advance beyond their present condition. To some, with visions of boys shooting their schoolmates, highly intelligent people going berserk, and various other isolated but impacting acts of of violence, this may seem an overly optimistic viewpoint. Remember that we see humans from outside your species and are more objective about such things. Humans, true humans, that is, "H. sapiens sapiens", are subjectively hard on themselves. We can help you with this aspect. Darla What does this have to do with astronomy? Everything ultimately has something to do with astronomy. And THAT'S why sf writers settled upon "astrobiology", because astronomy was, is and always will be "The First Science". -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! nightbat True science advances with the death of outdated old proved false unfounded ideas. at your service, the nightbat Death is unnecessary. True science advances with the "refinement" of outdated, old, proved false, and yet sometimes very well-founded ideas. There will be more about how death is unnecessary in later conversations on this subject matter. -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla Have been studying and day dreaming on the "membrane" I will post on it shortly. Can start with the surface tension of water as the area of first reproducing molecules(strands of life) A floating bubble has a lot to tell. Bert I sense a true "BINGO" in there somewhere! -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
On Dec 15, 6:40*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Darla *Have been studying and day dreaming on the "membrane" I will post on it shortly. Can start with the surface tension of water as the area of first reproducing molecules(strands of life) * A floating bubble has a lot to tell. *Bert That "floating bubble" of water happens to exist NOT because of gravity. Actually, gravity and even pressure has little to do with the molecular binding forces and complexity of whatever's containing or accommodating our DNA/RNA. Your pretend/fictitious ET "seans" and their Darla minions as species go-betweens are apparently responsible for the more recent evolution of humanity and most everything else. So, everything that's wrong with yourself and otherwise too spendy or nasty about your day by day survival you can credit or blame on them (including our environment and how screwed up Florida is). ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
On Dec 15, 1:33*pm, "Darla" wrote:
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla *Have been studying and day dreaming on the "membrane" I will post on it shortly. Can start with the surface tension of water as the area of first reproducing molecules(strands of life) * A floating bubble has a lot to tell. *Bert I sense a true "BINGO" in there somewhere! -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Why do you toy with the mentally deficient, and claim such greatness? The sean and Darla mindset and subsequent actions are exactly the same as the Zionist Nazi Rothschild mindset. ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On the Origin of Life: The Cell
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Dec 15, 1:33 pm, "Darla" wrote: "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla Have been studying and day dreaming on the "membrane" I will post on it shortly. Can start with the surface tension of water as the area of first reproducing molecules(strands of life) A floating bubble has a lot to tell. Bert I sense a true "BINGO" in there somewhere! -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! Why do you toy with the mentally deficient? I think Dad toys with you because you let him. and claim such greatness? Seans don't usually claim "greatness". It's just that humans like yourself are always claiming "smallness". The sean and Darla mindset and subsequent actions are exactly the same as the Zionist Nazi Rothschild mindset. ~ BG See? And you are SO SO SO small compared to those ZNR humans, right? It must be such a helpless feeling to be so small. Your cup of fear runs over, you empty it and be free. So you see, seans are "great" because we've considered the alternative and we don't like it. -- **** Lomie Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Origin of Life as Interpreted by Model Mechanics | kenseto[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 4 | February 16th 08 11:05 PM |
New Hypothesis For Origin of Life Proposed (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 5th 07 06:41 AM |
New Hypothesis For Origin of Life Proposed (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee[_1_] | News | 0 | December 5th 07 05:39 AM |
Comet probes reveal evidence of origin of life, scientists claim | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 16th 07 01:27 PM |