|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Limited re-use seems good.
Richard Schumacher :
Better is the enemy of good enough. Holding out for the perfect space launch system is not going to bring space tourism or space industries either. It's just going to bring endless waiting. No sensible person is holding out for perfect anything. If we don't choose to build spacecraft that don't destroy themselves and kill their crews every couple hundred launches we will never do anything significant in space. Well, first aside from the shuttle most present day rockets destroy themselves on every single flight. The rolling re-useable idea sees to be a good one, only fly each rocket a limited number of time, then build a new one. Then you don't need the system to last for over hundred flights and you are not tempted to fly it one more time at the end of it life because you already have a new one rolling off the factory floor. Earl Colby Pottinger -- I make public email sent to me! Hydrogen Peroxide Rockets, OpenBeos, SerialTransfer 3.0, RAMDISK, BoatBuilding, DIY TabletPC. What happened to the time? http://webhome.idirect.com/~earlcp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No U.S. Hab Module may be good news | Peter Altschuler | Space Station | 5 | July 27th 04 12:59 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
Requirements / process to become a shuttle astronaut? | Dan Huizenga | Space Shuttle | 11 | November 14th 03 07:33 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |
The Little Engineer That Could--Humor | Karl Gallagher | Policy | 0 | July 23rd 03 08:13 PM |