Chapt30 Titius Bode Rule quantized #372 Atom Totality 4th ed

Chapter 30
Subject: moons of Jupiter also follow Titius Bode Rule

I did a little searching for whether the satellites (moons) of Jupiter
follows also a Titius Bode Rule and to my pleasant
surprize they did. I speak of only the 4 largest Jovian moons:

Io 0.4
Europa 0.7
Ganymede 1.0
Callisto 1.8

contrast those distances with the distance of the inner planets
and the Titius Bode Rule:

Mercury 0.4
Venus 0.7
Earth 1.0
Mars 1.5

Titius Bode Rule
(0 + 4)/10 = 0.4
(3 + 4)/10 = 0.7
(6 + 4)/10 = 1.0
(12 + 4)/10 = 1.6

From Jupiter and beyond becomes basically a doubling so the
suffix of +4 becomes meaningless.

So basically, the Titius Bode Rule is a quantum mechanics of
a Balmer or Rydberg progression of spectral lines, for the inner
planets and for the moons of Jupiter. But when you get to
the doubling effect, that comes from the inverse square law
of the Coulomb force or the force of gravity as inverse square.

No-one in science until now has been able to explain why the planets
and the moons of Jupiter should follow such a geometric
progression. They could not explain it because they did not have
a Atom Totality to provide a structure. The reason the planets
follow a geometric progression spacing is the same reason that Tifft
found galaxies follow a quantum spacing. And
that reason is because the entire cosmos is a atom itself. The
universe is one big gigantic atom of plutonium and so astronomy is
quantum mechanics.


Chapter 30
Subject: mean density of Jupiter moons follows pattern of the inner
planets

The inner planets to the Sun follow
a quantized spacing distance known as the Titius-Bode Rule which is
surprizing of itself, but even more surprizing is that the 4 largest
moons of Jupiter follows this Titius Bode Rule with Jupiter as its
focus.

Here I am going to make a table of the
mean density of planets, Sun, and satellites. To
show that the mean density follows a quantization
just as the distance spacing follows a quantization
pattern.

These numbers were gathered from Wikipedia:

Sun, average density 1.4 gm/cm^3 but core is 150 gm/cm^3 and where
core is equal to about 0.2 solar radii

Mercury, 5.4 gm/cm^3, metal core is 42% of volume

Venus, 5.2 gm/cm^3, metallic core

Earth, 5.5 gm/cm^3, metal core 17% volume

Moon, 3.3 gm/cm^3, iron core

Mars, 3.9 gm/cm^3, iron sulfide core

---------
Jupiter, 1.3 gm/cm^3, rocky core that is 12-45 Earth
mass and 3 to 15% of Jupiter's total mass

Saturn, 0.7 gm/cm^3, (less dense than water), rocky
core 9 to 22 times Earth mass

--------
Satellites of Jupiter:

Io, 3.5 gm/cm^3, iron core

Europa, 3.0 gm/cm^3, iron core

Ganymede, 1.9 gm/cm^3, Fe and FeS iron core

Callisto, 1.8 gm/cm^3, silicate core

_____

Saturn satellite

Titan, 1.8 gm/cm^3 silicate core

Now I hope I typed in all those numbers correctly
and what we need is a website that gives pure tables
of just one specific detail for all the planets, satellites
and the Sun and other astro bodies on just that particular detail. So
for mean-mass it has one table that gives all those astro bodies of
just that particular
number, so that a person does not have to track down each astro body
and compile a table.

We should have a table that gives just the percent of
volume of the core of the astro bodies and the composition of those
cores.

The above is evidence in favor of the CellWell1 and
CellWell2 theory that the inner planets and Sun are
twice as old as Jupiter and the outer gas giants
as well as the moons of those gas giants.

The idea behind those numbers is that Dirac new-radioactivities takes
about another 5 billion years to
boost the mean density of Io and Europa to equal
the mean density of Mercury and Venus respectively.
So that the multiplicative-creation process in Dirac's
new-radioactivities multiplies up the nuclei of the
existing atoms in Io and Europa so that the density
reaches the density of the inner planets.

So far so good in terms of supportive evidence
of CellWell theory that the Titius Bode Rule is confirmed by the inner
planets and by the moons of
Jupiter as well as the mean-density.

So the evidence so far is in favor of Dirac new-radioactivities and
showing that the Nebular Dust
Cloud theory was a fake theory.


Subject: new Titius Bode Rule-- Plutonium-Titius-Bode Rule


Alright, let me try to give you a new rule for the distance spacing of
planets. A rule that follows a Coulomb or gravity force law. Where we
consider that the Titius Bode Rule above for the inner planets and the
satellites of Jupiter
to be secondary spacings and not primary spacings.

Let me call this new Rule the Plutonium-Titius-Bode Rule:

1 + 2^2 = 5
2 + 3^2 = 11
3 + 4^2 = 19
4 + 5^2 = 29

Now here are the actual distance spacings of Jupiter to Neptune

Jupiter = 5.2 Au
Saturn = 9.5 Au
Uranus = 19.1 Au
Neptune = 30.0 Au

Now if I carried it out to a fifth planet beyond Jupiter I would have
5 + 6^2 = 41
which is not bad for Pluto at actual 39.4 Au.

The bad thing about the Titius Bode Rule is that it was one formula
for two different planetary groupings. I call them CellWell1 and
CellWell2.

The analogy to spectral lines of Quantum Mechanics is that the old
Titius-Bode Rule is the fine structure lines for in-between primary
spectral lines.

So the primary grouping are the Sun to Jupiter Saturn Uranus Neptune
and the secondary grouping is that between Sun and Jupiter or that
between Jupiter of its satellites.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies