A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Obvious Falsehood of the Second Law of Thermodynamics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old October 19th 17, 06:20 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Obvious Falsehood of the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Non-isothermal heat engines - apparently do not violate the second law of thermodynamics:

http://readingpenrose.files.wordpres...and-engine.gif

"All materials react to heat in some way. But this new shape-changing polymer reacts to temperatures as small as the touch of human skin to contract - in the process lifting as much as 1,000 times its own weight." http://gizmodo.com/this-new-shape-ch...-it-1759165438

"Stretchy Science: A Rubber Band Heat Engine. Learn how a rubber band can turn heat into mechanical work with this simple activity. [...] Your blow dryer essentially turned your rubber band into a heat engine - a machine that turns thermal energy into mechanical work." https://www.scientificamerican.com/a...ber-band-heat/

ISOTHERMAL analogs - pH-sensitive polymers - do violate the second law of thermodynamics:

http://www.gsjournal.net/old/valev/val3.gif

"When the pH is lowered (that is, on raising the chemical potential, μ, of the protons present) at the isothermal condition of 37°C, these matrices can exert forces, f, sufficient to lift weights that are a thousand times their dry weight." http://www.google.com/patents/US5520672

A. KATCHALSKY, POLYELECTROLYTES AND THEIR BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS, p. 15, Figure 4: "Polyacid gel in sodium hydroxide solution: expanded. Polyacid gel in acid solution: contracted; weight is lifted." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih..gov/pmc/ar...00645-0017.pdf

The following four-step isothermal cycle, if carried out quasi-statically (reversibly), clearly violates the second law of thermodynamics:

1. The polymer is initially stretched. The operator adds hydrogen ions (H+) to the system. The force of contraction increases.
2. The polymers contracts and lifts a weight.
3. The operator removes the same amount of H+ from the system. The force of contraction decreases.
4. The operator stretches the polymer and restores the initial state of the system.

The net work extracted from the cycle is positive unless the following is the case:

The operator, as he decreases and then increases the pH of the system (steps 1 and 3), does (loses; wastes) more work than the work he gains from weight-lifting.

However electrochemists know that, if both adding hydrogen ions to the system and then removing them are performed quasi-statically, the net work involved is virtually zero (the operator gains work if the hydrogen ions are transported from a high to a low concentration and then loses the same amount of work in the backward transport). That is, the net work involved in steps 1 and 3 is zero, and the net work extracted from steps 2 and 4 is positive, in violation of the second law of thermodynamics.

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Obvious Violations of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 March 20th 17 11:42 AM
Obvious Violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 September 25th 16 08:56 AM
The Obvious Falsehood of Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 March 7th 16 11:48 AM
THE FUNDAMENTAL FALSEHOOD OF MODERN PHYSICS Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 August 5th 13 06:49 AM
ABANDONING EINSTEIN'S FALSEHOOD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 May 29th 12 06:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.