|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
At: http://home.cwru.edu/~sjr16/advanced/stars_binvar.html we find the
following nonsense: "The other way for a binary system to form is if a free star happens to fall into another star's gravitational pull, and become locked in orbit because it does not have enough energy to escape. (This is the same way some planets get their moons: An asteroid is captured by a planet's gravitational pull.)" This stuff is going out to the public as if it had everything to do with the facts. In reality it is pseudoscientific gibberish which has become the accepted dogma of modern physics and astrophysics academia. Now it is being presented to the public as if it were genuine knowledge when it is really nothing of the kind. Planets are created by the oscillation of their electromagnetotoroid (EMT). For a link to a model of an EMT go to: http://www.singtech.com/NewEMT.html An EMT is a large scale flux loop structure. A primary flux loop structure can be united with many other such structures because they are, in effect, bosons. Thus, they easily and readily overlap in the same momentum space. A large scale flux loop structure can be composed of a very high density of discrete flux loops or a lower density. Flux loops are real phenomenal objects. If you don't think so then I suggest you look at any good photos of the sun's photosphere which can show magnetic loop structures in profile. We mathematically model them as vector fields such as Del X H or Del X E (depending upon the type). And an electromagnetic boson (photon) is an electron and its charge conjugate in superposition. Think about it; a photon disassociates into an electron and an anti-electron (positron) during what is called a pair creation event. Of course, there is nothing actually being ‘created' but pseudo scientists, being what they are, have decided to call such an event ‘pair creation' when, in fact, it is really only a conservative pair transformation event. When an electron and a positron recombine and produce gamma ray photons the same pseudoscientific establishment deemed it proper to call such an event ‘pair annihilation' when, in fact, nothing is being annihilated at all but, again is only undergoing a conservative transformation event. But for you who are able to listen, you should realize that a charged particle and its charge conjugate in superposition produces a gravitational field. There you have it, the secret to the unification of electromagnetism and gravity. So simple. But you'll never actually get there unless you first understand the nature of a charged particle. Well, now as you look at the oscillating EMT at the link provided you'll see that it goes from being an E loop structure (Del X E) which is expansive where you see that the E flux loop has a small minor radius and a large major radius to being a magnetic loop structure (Del X H) which is a self compacting mode which results in a small major radius and a larger minor radius. During the compact mode which has the features of an electric dipole (Del X H mode) mass in the form of quantum scale flux loops are created in the core along the inner equator. These quantum scale flux loop systems are nothing less than neutrons. The gravitational terminus of the flux loop is its toroidal axis. The neutrons begin to accumulate to that axis and because a gravitational field produces a charge separation effect electrons from decaying neutrons are absolutely excluded from the gravitational terminus axis. This allows the accumulation of only protons and neutrons along that loops. This ring material I have called Isaacium. Isaac in Hebrew means the laughter of disbelief. I reckon that most of the pseudo scientists of this day who believe that they are astrophysicists and cosmologists will ‘laugh in disbelief' the first time they hear the mention of the idea that Isaacium rings occur in the cores of stars (and planets). If the oscillation of the magnitude of the toroidal axis of the major EMT of a star occurs faster than the Isaacium ring can readjust its dimensions then the Isaacium ring will be temporarily left out of the moving gravitational terminus axis and will begin to acquire a cascade of electrons which previously, because of the charge separation effect, were excluded from the region where the Isaacium was. This acquisition of a flood of electrons will produce a flash of x-rays, gamma rays (plus visible spectrum photons) and will cause the Isaacium to begin to differentiate into a variety of atomic species. As the Isaacium fissions into various atomic species it undergoes a huge volumetric increase which is essentially the same thing as a fission explosion. If the EMT has a regular oscillation cycle then you'll see a regularity to the brightening and dampening of the star. This is the essential aspects of a Cepheid variable. The problem, however, is that two Cepheid variables may be the same size and therefore oscillate at the same frequency (have the same period) but one may have a much less dense flux loop system than the other. Such a variable star would then produce less matter in its compact mode state and hence would have less Isaacium to decay and would produce a dimmer bright period. That star could actually be much closer than a brighter one. So, there goes the notion that Cepheid variables are accurate yardsticks. They are nothing of the kind. Stars and planets are very similar in the fact that both of them typically will have an active EMT. When a planet's EMT fades it will stop producing mass and the planet will stop growing. You can see if you look at the seafloor spreading zones that the Earth has grown in volume 6.3 fold over its size at the period referred to as the Jurassic. See: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Launchpad/6520/ Planets grow. The moons of planets are created in the same way that planets are and it isn't by accretion but rather because a planet's EMT generates mass in the core and by that means a planet increases its volume. Right now we can see that Io, a moon of Jupiter, produces tremendously hot lavas; much hotter than any terrestrial lavas. The mainstream pseudo scientists say that it is tidal distortion of the planet which causes friction in the interior of the planet. In fact, that is utter hogwash. Once the magma becomes hot enough to liquidize then the viscosity drops and the resistance to shearing is no longer present and hence you can only get magma so hot by tidal flexing and the lavas coming out of Io are much too hot to be produced in this manner. In fact, Io has been producing mass in its core and Io has been growing because of this and has been producing super hot plumes emerging from its core. You people are really in the stone age of science to believe all the rampant pseudoscientific nonsense that the denizens of academia have been shoving down your throats. When the Earth's EMT undergoes its next mode change from the E loop mode which it presently is in to the H-loop mode then it, too, will begin to produce mass at a tremendous rate. Hundreds of billions of tons per second in the form of neutrons. This will quickly translate to a rapid rise in lithospheric tension and then to the failure of the roots of orogens (mountain belt systems) worldwide. Whole mountain chains will begin rapidly descending at the rate of hundreds of meters per hour. With the Earth's EMT in the electric dipole mode there will be intense radiation storm damage each time there is a solar flare directed at the Earth. Huge earthquakes and tsunamis will kill hundreds of millions of people and solar scorching will kill millions more. But the pseudo scientists of this age are more intent on protecting the status of the phony knowledge that they have dreamed up than they are of learning the truth and getting the truth out to the public. This is as it should be though because it was written that when the seventh angel should begin to sound that the mystery of God should be finished. We are now about 250 years into the Seventh Great Day. It is near midnight. This new physics is part of that mystery and it reveals the destruction which is about to come upon the Earth. Wouldn't it be nice if the pseudo scientists in academia had as much love for their fellow man as they have for their paychecks? But they don't. Nor do they have a love of the truth. Therefore because they should have been in a position to warn the public of the coming dangers they are like sleeping dogs which cannot bark. They love to slumber and to make up just so stories to lull the public into believing that they are getting something of value for their money. But the public also has some blame because they love to hear the pseudoscience and they pay to educate their sons and daughters in the same and hence they too will pay the price for their continued support of pathological science. They will pay the price in the blood and lives of their sons and daughters. How will you explain your shortsightedness to your children as they go down to their graves in terror? When the wrath of God starts then it will be too late to repent. Perhaps you should think about repenting now, before it is too late? -- Peace to the followers of Jesus Christ -- Charles Cagle antispam measure - drop the 't' for email. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
[snip] You again, with the same old horse manure. [snip] Franz |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
In message , CCRyder
writes This stuff is going out to the public as if it had everything to do with the facts. In reality it is pseudoscientific gibberish Now it is being presented to the public as if it were genuine knowledge when it is really nothing of the kind. -- Richard Herring |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
In message , CCRyder
writes [apocalypse snipped] much love for their fellow man as they have for their paychecks? But they don't. Nor do they have a love of the truth. Therefore because they should have been in a position to warn the public of the coming dangers they are like sleeping dogs which cannot bark. Just supposing, for the sake of argument, that your nonsense were actually the case: What would you expect them to *do* with this warning? -- Richard Herring |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
"CCRyder" wrote in message Glad we got that all cleared up. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
CCRyder wrote:
[crap snipped] Crank Information http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/di...CTerminus.html http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Si...ww .crank.net http://www.rense.com/earthchanges/frenchfry.htm http://www.teleport.com/~singtech/wrath.html |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
"Midjis" @ . wrote in message .50... (CCRyder) wrote: This stuff is going out to the public as if it had everything to do with the facts. In reality it is pseudoscientific gibberish which has become the accepted dogma of modern physics and astrophysics academia. Now it is being presented to the public as if it were genuine knowledge when it is really nothing of the kind. I have no qualifications in astrophysics. My knowledge of physics extends as far as a GCSE (British secondary school) qualification and many years of casual interest. So I am completely unqualified to ask this question, but I am going to ask it anyway: If something is the 'accepted dogma of modern physics and astrophysics academia', then is it not reasonable for the public also to accept such 'dogma' until we are told otherwise? Why should we reject a model that seems to conform with what we are told of gravity and other factors? As I said, I am not qualified to challenge your remarks about 'electromagnetotoroids', but I have always believed that science is about disproving things. So I would be interested to see you show that binary systems are *not* formed by the capture of one star by another. Remember, you scorn the idea that this could be, so you must show that this has never happened for your scorn of 'current dogma' to be justified. But then, having read the remainder of your post, particularly your comments on your 'Isaacium', it is clear that you are fully expecting to be mocked, and indeed that you welcome such so that you can rail against 'pseudo-scientists'. By the way, to the best of my knowledge "Isaac" simply means "he laughs". Rest assured that with your GCSE in physics, you know more physics than our little Charles Cagle, even if he has been transmogrified into CCRyder. He is full of bull**** and insists on making a song about it. He has spouted his verbal horse manure about 'electromagnetotoroids' for years and years. In spite of very many attempts by readers to get him to flesh out his nonsense with a bit of quantitative backup, he has failed totally to do anything of the kind. He will, of course bluster yet again, but he will not answer this note of mine with some actual calculations. If you want to get him really angry, you will ask him how many more people he has recently conned into giving him money to build his table-top nuclear power source. Franz |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
"CCRyder" wrote in message ... At: http://home.cwru.edu/~sjr16/advanced/stars_binvar.html we find the following nonsense: "The other way for a binary system to form is if a free star happens to fall into another star's gravitational pull, and become locked in orbit because it does not have enough energy to escape. (This is the same way some planets get their moons: An asteroid is captured by a planet's gravitational pull.)" This stuff is going out to the public as if it had everything to do with the facts. In reality it is pseudoscientific gibberish which has become the accepted dogma of modern physics and astrophysics academia. Now it is being presented to the public as if it were genuine knowledge when it is really nothing of the kind. Planets are created by the oscillation of their electromagnetotoroid (EMT). For a link to a model of an EMT go to: http://www.singtech.com/NewEMT.html An EMT is a large scale flux loop structure. A primary flux loop structure can be united with many other such structures because they are, in effect, bosons. You appear to have increased your vocabulary. Pity that you don't realise that you are discussing classical fields here, and the concept of a boson belongs to QM [snip] Tell me if the stuff I snipped differs substantially from your previous bleatings. If it does, I might read it, for a small fee. Franz |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
CCRyder wrote:
[snip] Planets are created by the oscillation of their electromagnetotoroid (EMT). [snip] Charles Cagle Idiot. http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm (The parity Eotvos experiment is queued) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rampant Pseudoscience in Astrophysics Brings Death
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A brief list of things that show pseudoscience | Vierlingj | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 14th 04 08:38 PM |
MacDougall space & Astral Form part 1 | Majestyk | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 12th 04 05:03 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 06:21 AM |
Astral form discovered a hundred years ago! | John Carruthers | Astronomy Misc | 2 | December 23rd 03 03:08 AM |
Complete Thesis on MacDougall Space and the Astral Form | Majestic | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 15th 03 09:29 PM |