A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old January 7th 11, 11:15 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.

In sci.math Darwin123 wrote:
On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.

Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.

....

Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.

--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
-- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600
  #12  
Old January 7th 11, 11:18 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Blissfull
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote:
In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.

Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.


...

Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.

--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600


..
..
Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles .
Viva… Viva… Viva

Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes ,
which they became a laughing stock all the time.

  #13  
Old January 8th 11, 12:52 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Pal
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

On 7 يناير, 22:18, Blissfull wrote:
On 7 يناير, 22:15, wrote:

In sci.math Darwin123 wrote: On Jan 7, 11:28?am, PD wrote:
Androcles claims to be a devout believer in Newtonian mechanics and
yet this kind of crap comes out of his mind.
Â* Â* Androcles really doesn't know the first thing about Newtonian
physics.


...


Sure doesn't seem to think much of Kepler.


--
[Full metal rebuttal:]
Not true.
Â* -- John Stafford , 08 Dec 2010 10:16:59 -0600


.
.
Viva.. the great hero of science Androcles Â* .
Viva… Viva… Viva

Androcles footwear superior than the head of Einstein hordes ,
which they became a laughing stock all the time.


-
  #14  
Old January 8th 11, 11:16 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Chris.B[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,410
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

Andrex is a common troll. He will say and do anything which gains him
attention. Look at his recent behaviour where he interupted thread
after thread to dangle his bait. (Kelleher style) Now he has your
attention he can argue any nonsense which come into his head, Which is
most of the time. Default defence, when cornered is the foul-mouthed
infant act. He is the screaming kid, rolling on the floor at the
supermarket, while his sham parent is sorting 24 x 7 verbal garbage on
their cell phone.

He is no different from Kelleher, Retch and all the other desperate
inadequates of this world. They can't stand not being in the
limelight. Attention deficiency order by proxy. His pedantic acolytes
have the same problem as Oriel's. They suffer from rabid naivety. By
all means take the **** out of him but for god's sake don't take the
bait! It wouldn't surprise me, in the least, to discover that
Kelleher, Hanson and Andrex are one and the same. The playground
teaser who never grew up. One completely unrecognised clot claiming
superiority to Einstein, Newton and Napoleon combined? And you respond
in serious debate? Would you discuss Relativity outside the bus
station with a raving bag lady? Perhaps you would?
  #15  
Old January 8th 11, 11:20 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Andrew Smallshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:

"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --


Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.


So do you care to explain how the observer may simultaneously be
on the roundabout and not on the roundabout after having been thrown
off?

--
Andrew Smallshaw

  #16  
Old January 8th 11, 12:21 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Androcles[_39_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.


"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message
.. .
| On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:
|
| "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
| K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
|
| Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
|
| So do you care to explain how the observer may simultaneously be
| on the roundabout and not on the roundabout after having been thrown
| off?
|
Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution?
Or even why you snip text at all?
Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot?

"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Andrew Smallshaw.

Is this ball on the roundabout?
http://ww2010.atmos.uiuc.edu/(Gh)/guides/mtr/fw/gifs/coriolis.mov
What sensible force does it experience?



  #17  
Old January 8th 11, 01:10 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Jerry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 502
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

On Jan 7, 5:32*am, "Androcles"
wrote:
http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). *Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

*"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!


Acceleration and velocity vectors are not required to be
collinear. It would be a very boring world if they were.

Jerry

  #18  
Old January 8th 11, 05:02 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Andrew Smallshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 206
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.

On 2011-01-08, Androcles wrote:

"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message
.. .
| On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:
|
| "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
| K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
|
| Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
|
Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution?
Or even why you snip text at all?
Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot?


Try reading any guide on netiquette. No one needs to read the same
stuff over and over, particuarly when it is half baked rubbish such
as this.

Now, do you have a substantive reply or are your ad hominem arguments
an admission you don't have one. For that matter, try explaining
the difference between an overly simplistic mathematical model
which point masses with a more thorough treatment that handles the
forces within realistic, non-point masses. Those are the forces
the observer directly feels and is what Einsteind was getting at.

--
Andrew Smallshaw

  #19  
Old January 8th 11, 05:14 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Joe[_16_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.


Poor drunken drocels will spend the rest of his pathtic life trying to
disprove
the smartest minds of our time becuase he sees him self as a wannabe
Einstein.
Drunken drocles will never amount to **** and can't admit he's just an
average
idiot.

"Androcles" wrote in message
...
http://www.bartleby.com/173/23.html

Albert Einstein (1879-1955). Relativity: The Special and General Theory.
1920.

"An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial direction" --
Einstein

http://mcaaron.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/schleich_catapult.jpg
Notice the cup is pointing tangentially.
Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
An observer who is sitting eccentrically on a disc is sensible of a force
which acts in a tangential direction.

NEWTON'S FIRST LAW.
Every body perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a
right
line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed
thereon.

The lying idiot Einstein doesn't know the meaning of radial.
Proven by experiment!
Proven by peer review!




  #20  
Old January 8th 11, 08:19 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Androcles[_39_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 134
Default Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper.


"Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message
.. .
| On 2011-01-08, Androcles wrote:
|
| "Andrew Smallshaw" wrote in message
| .. .
| | On 2011-01-07, Androcles wrote:
| |
| | "An observer who is sitting eccentrically on the disc
| | K' is sensible of a force which acts outwards in a radial
direction" --
| |
| | Nobody is ever thrown off a roundabout radially.
| |
| Would you care to explain why you snip the attribution?
| Or even why you snip text at all?
| Is it to deliberately confuse others or just because you are an idiot?
|
| Try reading

I can read. Obviously you cannot, you ****ing snipping imbecile.

--
*plonk*

Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated;
you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive,
unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic
subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising
for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George
Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination
or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread.

Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because
this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are
left to decide which is most applicable to you.

There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically
admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would
wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill-
filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value
as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the
dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the
same spot and repeat the process eternally.

This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing
that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry
or crackpot theories without challenge.

You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The
kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I
purchase a new computer or hard drive.
Update: the last clearance was 19/08/10. Some individuals have been
restored to the list.

I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose
of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you.

I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't,
damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off.









 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ignorant lying Roberts should STUDY relativity. Androcles[_22_] Astronomy Misc 3 October 23rd 09 08:18 PM
Debunked by Proof: Einstein's Relativity Theory Is Wrong! - PROOF #1 qbit Astronomy Misc 6 August 9th 07 04:04 PM
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 21 May 30th 07 08:51 AM
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT 46erjoe Misc 964 March 10th 07 07:10 AM
elsewhere brian a m stuckless wrote: alt.local.village.idiot,alt.mo-rons,sci.physics.relativity brian a m stuckless Policy 0 October 15th 05 04:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.