|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
Astronomy is on the front page of the Times this morning, but not the way
you would prefer. As my wife said when she brought the paper in and handed it to me, "You'll love this!" The story is about the dumbing down of science exams in schools. The picture of V838 Mon is nice, but the question, stated in very small print to be from Edexcel, is: --------- Q Chei and Jas visit an observatory with their class. The astronomers who work there show them some instruments they use to find out about many different types of stars Many people observe the stars using A a telescope B a microscope C an X-ray tube D a synthesiser ----------------- As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Comments? -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
I have got too agree with Mike here,
children of all ages have far greater knowledge that they are ever given credit for. On the whole, with the astronomy part of the curriculum, it is often the pupils teaching the teachers! especially in Primary & Junior science. The questions I get asked astound some teachers! year 1's for example asking about black holes etc which is why I have to be up to date all the time unlike the current curriculum! All the best Andy StarDome - Astronomy - Astronautics - Planetarium Mr Andrew R Green B.Sc(Hons) FRAS. Fellow Royal Astronomical Society Director & Resident Astronomer StarDome, Director Anglo-Australian Astronomy Education Partnership www.stardomeplanetarium.co.uk "Mike Dworetsky" wrote in message ... Astronomy is on the front page of the Times this morning, but not the way you would prefer. As my wife said when she brought the paper in and handed it to me, "You'll love this!" The story is about the dumbing down of science exams in schools. The picture of V838 Mon is nice, but the question, stated in very small print to be from Edexcel, is: --------- Q Chei and Jas visit an observatory with their class. The astronomers who work there show them some instruments they use to find out about many different types of stars Many people observe the stars using A a telescope B a microscope C an X-ray tube D a synthesiser ----------------- As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Comments? -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
On Aug 29, 8:01 am, "Mike Dworetsky"
wrote: Astronomy is on the front page of the Times this morning, but not the way you would prefer. As my wife said when she brought the paper in and handed it to me, "You'll love this!" The story is about the dumbing down of science exams in schools. The picture of V838 Mon is nice, but the question, stated in very small print to be from Edexcel, is: --------- Q Chei and Jas visit an observatory with their class. The astronomers who work there show them some instruments they use to find out about many different types of stars Many people observe the stars using A a telescope B a microscope C an X-ray tube D a synthesiser ----------------- As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Comments? Perhaps the question tells us more about the low expectations of their examiners than anything else. Do you think they might add phone a friend, 50:50 and ask the audience to science exams next? I heard the report on Radio4 and it was cringe worthy. They seem to have completely lost the plot. Since when did science consist only of multiple choice questions or essays? Whatever happened to reasoning problems and bench experiments? BTW Isn't Edexcell the syllabus that still has an Astronomy O'Level ? Regards, Martin Brown |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
"Mike Dworetsky" wrote in message ... As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Well, as a cub scout leader a few weeks ago we were doing codes - transposing alpabet letters, etc. To make a start the children were asked to write out the alphabet. A third of them (12 out of 36) didn't know the alphabet. They knew the sequence a - b - c, but what came next was a mystery to many of them. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
"Manky Badger" wrote in message
... "Mike Dworetsky" wrote in message ... As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Well, as a cub scout leader a few weeks ago we were doing codes - transposing alpabet letters, etc. To make a start the children were asked to write out the alphabet. A third of them (12 out of 36) didn't know the alphabet. They knew the sequence a - b - c, but what came next was a mystery to many of them. Be afraid, be very afraid. If "alphabet" or "alphabetical order" isn't mandatory in the National Curriculum, what possible use does the NC serve? If it is mandatory, what happened? I think we learned it at age five or six, by drill and recitation. There was even a cringeworthy kid's tune for the alphabet. YMMV. I doubt that any of the kids in my class, including the dunces, got out of there without memorizing the alphabet. -- Mike Dworetsky (Remove pants sp*mbl*ck to reply) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
"Mike Dworetsky" wrote
Be afraid, be very afraid. If "alphabet" or "alphabetical order" isn't mandatory in the National Curriculum, what possible use does the NC serve? If it is mandatory, what happened? I think we learned it at age five or six, by drill and recitation. There was even a cringeworthy kid's tune for the alphabet. YMMV. I doubt that any of the kids in my class, including the dunces, got out of there without memorizing the alphabet. Scary indeed. Speaking for myself, I have no time for such snobbish abecedarian pedantry! Oh, let's have a discussion on the fascinating subject of the relative affinities of adjectives for nouns in English. I mean, you say "big red ball", not "red big ball". Ok, let's not; it's off-topic. To return to the original subject, I also read this today on the BBC, and later saw it cited on Slashdot, and I was horrified. IMO, it really is undeniable that the standard of GCSEs and like exams is falling. I was in the last year to do O-levels, and for maths, we had to do differential calculus. Apparently that's never been in GCSE maths. And it's a very big, important subject and a very useful concept. I think it's also partly because of the government's constant tinkering with the syllabus, which is itself driven by the current political climate, wherein _any_ issue that can be made to be emotive and made into a political tool for winning votes and "hearts and minds" is fair game. So in order to be seen to be doing something constructive, they mess around with the education and exam systems. Education, like healthcare and crime reduction, is a prime candidate. They just won't leave it alone. I'm not *that* old, but I'm aware that I may sound old if I say what I feel, which is that "in my day" (although I was in the last year, as I said), there was no such silliness. O-levels were O-levels, and that was that, and they'd been in place for years. And teachers understood them, and how to teach the subjects for those exams, and didn't spend disproportionate amounts of time completing irrelevant, pointless paperwork. One of my friends is into Pink Floyd, and she recently showed me "The Wall", and I've only seen it once, but I'm reminded of a scene from it, where there's something like a meat grinding machine, and people are being fed into it, and strings of sausage meat emerge. It just seems that the government is seeking to maximise the efficiency of its education-sausage-machine, and turn out as many kids capable of attaining a grade "C" in {English, Maths} as possible, even if, to "yield" a year-on-year improvement in the figures, it's necessary to lower the bar. (That's not to say I think that that scene in "The Wall" is all about education, given its anti-war theme, but I was just using the image, because it matches my perception of this issue.) Rant over, for now. Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
Mike Dworetsky wrote:
As an astronomer and observatory director who organises observatory school tours and who gives some of the tours himself, all I can say is that Edexcel has a negative view of the intelligence of today's youngsters completely at odds with the impression I get. Comments? Given that GCSEs are arguably easier than ever, and about 40% of papers submitted this year still only merited a grade 'D' or less (which used to be a 'fail' when I was a lad), I wouldn't bet on it... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
"Mike Dworetsky" typed
I think we learned it at age five or six, by drill and recitation. There was even a cringeworthy kid's tune for the alphabet. YMMV. The cringewothy tune I heard for the alphabet, was 'Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star' (or 'Ah, Vous Dirai Je Maman') We received a lurid piece of 7" vinyl with it as a gift after one of my Dad's trips to the USA. Most cringeworthy then was the way it ended with 'ex why zee'... I doubt that any of the kids in my class, including the dunces, got out of there without memorizing the alphabet. Mine neither... -- Helen D. Vecht: Edgware. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
Fleetie wrote:
To return to the original subject, I also read this today on the BBC, and later saw it cited on Slashdot, and I was horrified. IMO, it really is undeniable that the standard of GCSEs and like exams is falling. I was in the last year to do O-levels, and for maths, we had to do differential calculus. Apparently that's never been in GCSE maths. And it's a very big, important subject and a very useful concept. Are you sure it wasn't "Additional Maths" O level ? I don't remember doing calculus as part of the basic Maths GCE (O&C 1979). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Front Page London Times
"Andy Guthrie" wrote
Fleetie wrote: To return to the original subject, I also read this today on the BBC, and later saw it cited on Slashdot, and I was horrified. IMO, it really is undeniable that the standard of GCSEs and like exams is falling. I was in the last year to do O-levels, and for maths, we had to do differential calculus. Apparently that's never been in GCSE maths. And it's a very big, important subject and a very useful concept. Are you sure it wasn't "Additional Maths" O level ? I don't remember doing calculus as part of the basic Maths GCE (O&C 1979). Absolutely sure. I did also do additional ("AO") maths O-level. This was in Kent in 1987. AO maths also had integration, which wasn't in the O-level. Martin -- M.A.Poyser Tel.: 07967 110890 Manchester, U.K. http://www.livejournal.com/userinfo.bml?user=fleetie |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All too quiet on the XXXXX front | Double-A | Misc | 14 | November 7th 06 01:05 AM |
Spot in front of sun Jan 15 | J. Todd Wasson | Solar | 2 | January 27th 05 03:11 PM |
Good Times BAD Times | Etok | Astronomy Misc | 12 | July 15th 04 05:01 PM |
From the Front Lines | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | June 8th 04 05:49 AM |
Nexus Rocket Engine Test Successful; 10 Times More Thrust Than Deep Space 1 Engine and Lasts 3 Times Longer (10 years) | [email protected] | Technology | 5 | December 30th 03 07:44 PM |