|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Daylight Saving Time
On Saturday, November 4, 2017 at 11:52:00 AM UTC, Mike Collins wrote:
Gerald Kelleher wrote: It seems that playing fast and loose with the English language or even torturing it comes at a price as followers of the early 20th century theorists have lost the capacity to put the back and forth motions of the planets and satellites around the parent Sun or parent planet using the normal language of motion to the left or to the right. The rule of thumb is that a planet or a satellite, as we see it from Earth, moves from left to right in front of the parent object and from right to left as it travels behind it. This restores context after to losing it to RA/Dec modelling. Except in the Southern Hemisphere. Herodotus knew this and described it in his account of the voyages of Phoenicians Very simple rule to understand and use the analogy to support it. Jupiter's satellites move from their widest point to the right of the planet as they pass in front of their parent and move from right to left as they moves behind the planet - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqZEgoJasPQ&t=21s With notable exceptions, the inner planets process the same motions as they move from left to right in front of the Sun and from right to left as they turn in behind the Sun - http://www.popastro.com/images/plane...ary%202012.jpg I would love to show time lapse but only sequential imaging exists presently. The Sun is stationary and central however the language of left/right can be used to describe the motions of the other planets and satellites or even the proof of the Earth's orbital motion where a star transitions from an evening to a morning appearance, not that the Earth moves parallel to the orbital plane but the Earth does. This alone accounts for the direct/retrograde motion of the faster moving Venus and Mercury and joins the separate perspective of direct/retrogrades of the slower moving planets seen from Earth. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Daylight Saving Time
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:40:37 -0700 (PDT), RichA
wrote: Daylight saving is garbage and should be done away with. It's not 1880 and we aren't all frigging farmers. Farmers don't care what the clock says. They operate on solar time. Daylight saving time was about saving energy for city dwellers. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't; I've seen different analyses. But they all conclude that any actual savings is small indeed, and most recent studies show that the disruption the change causes (in both directions) is economically harmful as well as hard on human health. It's a stupid thing to maintain. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Daylight Saving Time
The initial application of DST has a jarring effect on the rhythms of the body in the same way jet lag has so, in terms of chronobiology, it is worthwhile studying the motions of the Earth via astronomy or using the body clocks to put the motions of the Earth in order.
The reason the 24 hour day and rotation of the leap correction doesn't register is that our bodies are tuned to the daily cycle. Each year there is an approximate loss of 6 hours in orbital distance between the timekeeping format of 365 days/rotations and the true proportion of 365 1/4 rotations per orbital circuit. After four cycles of 365 days, we catch up with the true framework by applying a 24 hour cycle which the body clock is accustomed to so we don't feel the leap day correction. There is no exact fit between the proportions of rotations for 4 orbital circuits and timekeeping and it is the discrepancy that surfaces as the Precession of the Equinoxes insofar as the original references for the timekeeping framework is based on a first annual appearance of a star. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Daylight Saving Time
On 04/11/2017 14:20, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 22:40:37 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote: Daylight saving is garbage and should be done away with. It's not 1880 and we aren't all frigging farmers. Farmers don't care what the clock says. They operate on solar time. Indeed and these days the big combines even in the UK have powerful lights so that they can operate 24/7 or until the dew becomes a problem. Daylight saving time was about saving energy for city dwellers. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn't; I've seen different analyses. But they all conclude that any actual savings is small indeed, and most recent studies show that the disruption the change causes (in both directions) is economically harmful as well as hard on human health. It's a stupid thing to maintain. I think it does make a useful difference at higher latitudes like the UK where long light summer nights are helpful in getting things done after work. UK at latitude 50+ has winter daylight ~8h and in summer ~17h the extra light in the evening is useful to most people. At low latitudes the seasonal variation in daylength is less pronounced. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Daylight Saving Time - How To Explain It To The Average Citizen | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | April 12th 14 07:18 PM |
How to explain "Daylight Saving Time" to Average People | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | April 11th 14 12:09 PM |
Daylight Savings Time ... | palsing[_2_] | Misc | 1 | November 5th 12 04:55 PM |
GMT, UST or Daylight Saving? | Mark Jones Laptop2 | UK Astronomy | 1 | May 26th 07 09:04 PM |
daylight saving | Tony | UK Astronomy | 5 | October 16th 05 05:56 PM |