|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:09:51 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: One would think that a relacement 'Hubble' would be the most cost effective way to go. There is an argument for that. The Kodak blank is still out there someplace. But they'd have to mis-grind it to the same specification (spherical abberation and all) as Hubble 1, since the instruments on the ground were built to automatically compensate for the flaw. Now try telling Congress you're spending $1G for a deliberately flawed telescope... Anyway, I think someone recently pointed out that the Kodak blank no longer exists. In any case, keep in mind a Hubble mission was in the works and well along before Columbia changed everything. The conspiracy theorist in me still suspects that the Hubble SM-4 cancellation is a ploy to get Congress to back off the tougher mandates of the CAIB. The outrageously expensive, poorly justified robot mission (now pushing four times the full cost of Shuttle mission, or ten times the incremental cost) sure does make reinstating SM-4 look attractive to the beancounters. Once Congress, inevitably, orders NASA to reinstate SM-4, the door is open to NASA asking that lots of other painful restrictions be eased. Retire the Shuttle by 2010? Well, we would, but you demanded we fly once more to Hubble, so that will push retirement into 2011, and if you let one more mission in, how about letting us fly these other three also, rounding out the Fiscal Year nice and neatly. Stand-alone repair capability? That's gonna be tough, time-consuming and pricey and we'll need to use Safe Haven instead in the meantime. But since you're saying we can fly to Hubble without it, maybe we should just give up on the idea altogether and save the money... If Congress mandates SM-4, NASA gets to start chipping away at the other CAIB recommendations and they save their darling Hubble in the process. If not, NASA can foot -drag the ridiculously overpriced Hubble Robot until Hubble dies and the point is moot, they put an end to their most expensive science satellite, and they get to blame it all on the need for astronaut safety. It's a win-win for NASA. Brian |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian Thorn" wrote in message ... On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 01:09:51 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote: One would think that a relacement 'Hubble' would be the most cost effective way to go. There is an argument for that. The Kodak blank is still out there someplace. But they'd have to mis-grind it to the same specification (spherical abberation and all) as Hubble 1, since the instruments on the ground were built to automatically compensate for the flaw. Now try telling Congress you're spending $1G for a deliberately flawed telescope... Actually my proposal has been to refly the original experiment packages from Hubble. Sure, they're not up to date, but I'm sure some researchers would love to have the time. Launch it into GSO and run it from there. Anyway, I think someone recently pointed out that the Kodak blank no longer exists. That would be a bigger problem. :-) In any case, keep in mind a Hubble mission was in the works and well along before Columbia changed everything. The conspiracy theorist in me still suspects that the Hubble SM-4 cancellation is a ploy to get Congress to back off the tougher mandates of the CAIB. Could be. Brian |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:18:17 GMT, "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)"
wrote: But they'd have to mis-grind it to the same specification (spherical abberation and all) as Hubble 1, since the instruments on the ground were built to automatically compensate for the flaw. Now try telling Congress you're spending $1G for a deliberately flawed telescope... Actually my proposal has been to refly the original experiment packages from Hubble. I think major portions of them have already been scavenged for later instruments, particularly WF/PC-1. So that's a no-go. Brian |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:13:50 -0600, Bill the Cat wrote:
As are WFPC-3 and the other replacement instruments, plus new gyros and batteries - all built for the HST SM-04 mission. About all that's left to build would be a new hull and new solar arrays. And all the internal avionics, computers, the momentum wheels, the comm system, the secondary mirror, the magnetometers... Brian |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Brian Thorn wrote:
Of course we all do. But humans themselves travelling the cosmos have an infinitely greater ability to inspire. Witness the millions in the free world who stopped what they were doing to watch John Glenn's first launch, or Neil Armstrong set foot on the moon. Witness the millions who *didn't* stop for Conrad, or any of the others. Witness the ongoing legacy of Apollo in the form of people (many of which should know better) who believe that if it's not an impressive and showy stunt, then there is no point in enduring the dangers and hardships. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Bill the Cat wrote:
One would think that a relacement 'Hubble' would be the most cost effective way to go. There is an argument for that. The Kodak blank is still out there someplace. As are WFPC-3 and the other replacement instruments, plus new gyros and batteries - all built for the HST SM-04 mission. About all that's left to build would be a new hull and new solar arrays. And a new power system, and a new control system, and new pointing sensors, and all the cabling to tie them together, and all the integration and testing. Doable, possibly worth doing, but non-trival to say the least. D. -- Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh. -Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings. Oct 5th, 2004 JDL |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Neil Halelamien" wrote in message ups.com... Here's the actual NAS press release: http://www4.nationalacademies.org/ne...1?OpenDocument In an earlier NG post I predicted the cost would be too high. I've been proven right (again). |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Henk Boonsma" wrote in message news:1102669048.acaa7ec8af44b12a5879d73af8d1a1c5@t eranews... "Neil Halelamien" wrote in message ups.com... Here's the actual NAS press release: http://www4.nationalacademies.org/ne...1?OpenDocument In an earlier NG post I predicted the cost would be too high. I've been proven right (again). Umm, no offense, but that was an easy call. Many here made the same call. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg D. Moore (Strider)" wrote in message ... "Henk Boonsma" wrote in message news:1102669048.acaa7ec8af44b12a5879d73af8d1a1c5@t eranews... "Neil Halelamien" wrote in message ups.com... Here's the actual NAS press release: http://www4.nationalacademies.org/ne...1?OpenDocument In an earlier NG post I predicted the cost would be too high. I've been proven right (again). Umm, no offense, but that was an easy call. Many here made the same call. Ok I'll make another prediction then: the Shuttle mission to Hubble will go ahead, with another Shuttle on standby. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:23:26 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Greg D.
Moore \(Strider\)" made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: In an earlier NG post I predicted the cost would be too high. I've been proven right (again). Umm, no offense, but that was an easy call. Many here made the same call. Well, it was an easy call that it would be higher than the cost of a Shuttle mission, and higher than early predictions. Whether or not it is *too* high remains to be seen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
European high technology for the International Space Station | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | May 10th 04 02:40 PM |
Clueless pundits (was High-flight rate Medium vs. New Heavy lift launchers) | Rand Simberg | Space Science Misc | 18 | February 14th 04 03:28 AM |
Space Access Update #102 2/9/04 | Henry Vanderbilt | Policy | 1 | February 10th 04 03:18 PM |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
NASA Releases Dazzling Images From New Space Telescope | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 18th 03 07:02 PM |