|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe no inflation after all?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe no inflation after all?
On Friday, March 21, 2014 1:03:14 AM UTC-7, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Maybe no inflation after all? http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/...bicep2-results LOL Mainstream Fraud and Subsequent FUD is downright Pervasive Here we go again, with a bit more of the whole truth leaking out from those in charge of most everything. Perhaps we can have ourselves yet another Snowden and wikileaks moment. More Evidence of the Hollowness of Western Civilization https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...cs/dIz9IMK5gR4 By Ann Barnhardt http://www.barnhardt.biz Friday, March 7, 2014 I wrote in the John Maynard Keynes post http://www.barnhardt.biz/2014/02/17/...an-phenomenon/ about the hollowness and "fakeness" of Western civilization today. In case you didn't see it, KD had a post up a few days ago about so-called "peer reviewed" scientific journals and how they are nothing of the sort. http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=228825 Utterly fake articles made by automatic word generators that literally string random polysyllabic words together into sentence structures - in other words, NONSENSE - are being regularly published in these journals. An investigative study found over 120 such articles over the past few years. "Peer reviewed" science and academia is a LIE. Papers are published and certified as "peer reviewed" that have literally never been read by ANYONE, including the editors of the scientific journals. And yes, this echoes the fact that the so-called "laws" being passed and used to destroy civilization are likewise never actually read by anyone, most particularly the psychopath whore politicians who vote on them. This has been a recurring theme of this website since its inception over ten years ago. Guys, I'm telling you, stupid people and/or frauds are running the planet. In fact, civilization is so far gone that the higher-ranking a person is, be it in academia, business, politics or the Church, the less likely it is that they have any degree of competence or genuine skill. This is a lesson that I have learned over and over and over again. The very people in positions of authority that we all desperately want to believe are not just competent but truly knowledgable and wise, are, almost without exception, bluffing or openly incompetent. The truly competent are marginalized at best, and destroyed at worst. If you still believe in any way that higher-ups in the government, military, business world, universities or the Church are in any way competent to solve the unprecedented problems that humanity faces today (assuming that they want the problems solved at all), you are operating on a false premise that is so utterly contrary to reality that it defies quantification or even description. Recognizing and acknowledging this sad and terrifying reality is utterly, utterly critical. You MUST have an accurate observation and picture of the battlespace in order to have any hope of formulating, much less executing effective tactics. You all think that you are battling veritable giants and geniuses, when in fact you are battling a cadre of puny imbeciles and obvious frauds. The main quality these puny imbeciles and frauds have that is allowing them to roll over Western Civilization essentially uncontested is BOLDNESS. They act. They play offense. But more importantly, YOU DON'T. Yes, they play dirty and we can't. But the root problem isn't that they are beating us by playing dirty. The root problem is that we aren't playing at all. We are fielding no team whatsoever - not even a clean offense. We aren't even on the field. We are all over on the sidelines curled into the fetal position, eyes shut tight, trying desperately to rock ourselves to sleep - while a team of five slobbering fools marches uncontested down the field over and over again in a game of 11 man football. So yes, a cadre of frauds and imbeciles can absolutely roll over an entire civilization IF and ONLY IF the civilization is so weak and whipped, so steeped in an effeminate desire to deny reality and avoid confrontation (aka, "be nice"), that the said civilization will surrender itself to said frauds and imbeciles to avoid any sort of masculine confrontation of reality, much less the execution of bold corrective action. In short, we didn't "lose" our nation and our civilization - we forfeited it. It is indeed ironic that truly great men spring from cultures who don't particularly NEED them, and those cultures that desperately need good men to lead them are all but incapable of producing them. And this is why we pray, unceasingly, for the Divine Assistance and intervention in these especially dark days. More at: http://www.barnhardt.biz/2014/03/06/...-civilization/ Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi Om Shanti http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj - - - - This revelation actually doesn't surprise little old me one bit. Even when articles stipulate that something has been scientifically proven or interpreted as whatever, those specific scientists as having supposedly given their opinion or stamp of approval in support of a given research topic are usually of those not available for any further questioning, or even for background checks in order to get some independent perspective as to how this supposed scientific expertise or whatever discovery is even sufficiently qualified. Like our esteemed Ron Blakely of all things NASA and JPL (male counterpart of Sandy Wood) doesn't actually exist as a real person of any special qualification, but instead all sorts of mainstream media infomercials and textbook documents of published research, and otherwise all sorts of NASA PR media hype gets assigned to his name, as though Ron Blakely fact-checked and thus having authored it as officially approved. So, I'd rather doubt as to a greater extent if not entirely that Ron Blakely has even read and having fully understood the context of most if not all of the context that's linked and/or posted as though having come from the official authoritative desk of Ron Blakely. No wonder our moon is always getting taboo/nondisclosure rated, and Venus is supposedly too hot and nasty to touch (or is it simply all part of their ongoing ruse). Perhaps it's all a public-funded circus of systematic fraud and FUD that's unpoliced by any authority other than their own, and basically they have never policed their own kind. So, the "Hollowness of Western Civilization" it is. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe no inflation after all?
jan,
Would like to see if you have followed up on the spinning ball experiment. Have you talked with Bohr? Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Maybe no inflation after all?
On 21/03/2014 4:03 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
Maybe no inflation after all? http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/...bicep2-results LOL Neil Turok's comment: " "But these tweaks would be tremendously ugly....and in fact, I believe that if both Planck and the new results agree, then together they would give substantial evidence against inflation!" exclaims Turok, further explaining that "[we] must be careful before we treat them as true". " Wish he'd explain himself about why this would be evidence against inflation? That's now a mystery. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Inflation Debate - Sc Am | Nicolaas Vroom[_2_] | Research | 4 | April 1st 11 07:50 AM |
Probability of inflation | Russell Wallace | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 27th 06 01:30 AM |
Inflation? Help | kjakja | Research | 6 | February 9th 05 06:18 PM |
Inflation and reality | kjakja | Astronomy Misc | 2 | January 19th 05 05:40 PM |
The end of inflation | Charles Francis | Research | 0 | March 8th 04 07:58 PM |