|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Do you know the difference between the kuiper belt and the oort cloud?
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 6:16 am, "Pros Pere" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 2:36 pm, "Pros Pere" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 10:26 am, bert wrote: On Jan 10, 12:41 pm, Double-A wrote: On Jan 10, 6:16 am, bert wrote: On Jan 8, 9:38 am, bert wrote: On Dec 30 2009, 9:31 am, bert wrote: On Dec 27, 2:30 pm, Double-A wrote: On Dec 27, 8:22 am, bert wrote: On Dec 16, 8:49 pm, (Mondo Condo Spiffy Pumpenstiffy LLC) wrote: ???one is between mARS AND JUPITER AND THE CLOUD IS 2.7 LY OUT i BERT AM ON MY LOUSY DELL GO FIGURE- Finally forced to use the real computer, huh? And already crossposting all over the place! Your doing great, Bert. Keep it up! Double-A AA Dell is all I have. It is very dell indeed Oort cloud is mostly ice water,inaverage sizes of our largest Hurley comet. Kuipler belt is dusty rockes their average size is Temple 1 Its the Oort cloud that rained down life on Earth.Belt objects Meteors have changed life on Earth about 3 times.The dinosours fond that out the hard way Oi ya Bert Oort cloud begs the question. Does it orbit the Sun,or is it like an electron cloud? Can Sun's gravity at 2.7 LY have any effect on it? I have a theory Oort cloud uses black matter gravity. I base that on good science thinking.Last night NOVA was on "dark matter"mOST OF MY THOUGHTS are on dark matter,and where it might be hiding. Looking for it under the Earth wont cut it. Dark matter and space energy I am trying to have them relate.Negative energy,and gravity being a negative force keeps jumping into my mind.Accelerating universe (inflating) jumps in too.My spin is in theory is a help in this thinking. Seems stuff is spinning to fast(to much angular motion,but some way its stays together. Galaxies are proof of this. They do not have enough matter(mutual gravity) ,but they keep their structure the same for billions,and billions of years.It is so interesting to hypothersize on. Sum it up with if "acceleration is 6 times faster than c" it might be the answer. " Hope my thinking is getting better as I get use to the Dell go figure Bert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Double A 6Xc is my universe speed of acceleration at this spacetime.Speed of inflating is getting greater.That relates to greater distances between all objects both in the micro,and macro realms(worlds) It is based on lots of knowlege,and lots of intense thinking. Its nice being retired to have much time to do both. Universe inflating at 6Xc "Its back to the future" Only space and time do not have to obey SR Einstein knew that. Light speed is for EM force Bert Yes, it is EM waves/particles and EM objects, which we all are, that have to obey Einstein. Space-time itself is free to do its own thing. Double-A- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - AA Man will never go as far as Oort cloud. Like the meteor belt it has many miles seperating all its stuff.No chance of seeing it like in the movies.Stars in the background are never noticed as being blocked by objects in the cloud. It beg the questio . How did Oort know it was there? How did this guy Oort get a name like Oort? Bert ""The Oort cloud was "discovered" by Dutch astronomer Jan Hendrik Oort in 1950"" ~ BG To be more precise, the existence of a cloud that is the origin of long-period comets was first set forth by Ernst pik in 1932. Jan Oort revived the idea independently in 1950. pik thought the cloud was relatively small and revolved around the Sun. Oort and following scientists now think of the cloud in two ways, as a spherical cloud that completely surrounds the Solar system, and there is also a disc-shaped component component inside the outer Oort sphere. The disc-shaped part is thought to be on the ecliptic plane. The Kuiper belt and scattered disc, the other two known reservoirs of trans-Neptunian objects, are less than one thousandth the Oort cloud's distance, which is almost an entire light year away from the Sun. -- **** the Proz Fear Impedes Progress! Fight and Defeat Fear! Thanks for that bit of informative though perfectly terrestrial history that any 5th grader could have posted. Why don't you tell us something/anything we don't know about the Oort cloud? For example, is there anything out there that's similar or bigger than Sedna? ~ BG Yes. Then perhaps such large and extremely cold items are simply too sooty black to see, and otherwise too carbon coated for radar to detect. So why isn't this area or volume of stuff called the Ernst �pik cloud? ~ BG The cloud is sometimes called the Öpik (Opik)-Oort cloud for both it's postulators. -- **** the Proz Fear Impedes Progress! Fight and Defeat Fear! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Do you know the difference between the kuiper belt and the oortcloud?
On Jan 11, 1:54*pm, "Pros Pere" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 11, 6:16 am, "Pros Pere" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message .... On Jan 10, 2:36 pm, "Pros Pere" wrote: "BradGuth" wrote in message ... On Jan 10, 10:26 am, bert wrote: On Jan 10, 12:41 pm, Double-A wrote: On Jan 10, 6:16 am, bert wrote: On Jan 8, 9:38 am, bert wrote: On Dec 30 2009, 9:31 am, bert wrote: On Dec 27, 2:30 pm, Double-A wrote: On Dec 27, 8:22 am, bert wrote: On Dec 16, 8:49 pm, (Mondo Condo Spiffy Pumpenstiffy LLC) wrote: ???one is between mARS AND JUPITER AND THE CLOUD IS 2.7 LY OUT i BERT AM ON MY LOUSY DELL GO FIGURE- Finally forced to use the real computer, huh? *And already crossposting all over the place! *Your doing great, Bert. Keep it up! Double-A AA Dell is all I have. It is very dell indeed Oort cloud is mostly ice water,inaverage sizes of our largest Hurley comet. Kuipler belt is dusty rockes their average size is Temple 1 * Its the Oort cloud that rained down life on Earth.Belt objects Meteors have changed life on Earth about 3 times.The dinosours fond that out the hard way Oi ya Bert Oort cloud begs the question. Does it orbit the Sun,or is it like an electron cloud? Can Sun's gravity at 2.7 LY have any effect on it? I have a theory Oort cloud uses black matter gravity. I base that on good science thinking.Last night NOVA was on "dark matter"mOST OF MY THOUGHTS are on dark matter,and where it might be hiding. Looking for it under the Earth wont cut it. Dark matter and space energy I am trying to have them relate.Negative energy,and gravity being a negative force keeps jumping into my mind.Accelerating universe (inflating) jumps in too.My spin is in theory is a help in this thinking. Seems stuff is spinning to fast(to much angular motion,but some way its stays together. Galaxies are proof of this. They do not have enough matter(mutual gravity) ,but they keep their structure the same for billions,and billions of years.It is so interesting to hypothersize on. Sum it up with if "acceleration is 6 times faster than c" it might be the answer. " Hope my thinking is getting better as I get use to the Dell *go figure * Bert- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Double A *6Xc is my universe speed of acceleration at this spacetime.Speed of inflating is getting greater.That relates to greater distances between all objects both in the micro,and macro realms(worlds) It is based on lots of knowlege,and lots of intense thinking. Its nice being retired to have much time to do both. Universe inflating at 6Xc "Its back to the future" *Only space and time do not have to obey SR *Einstein knew that. Light speed is for EM force * *Bert Yes, it is EM waves/particles and EM objects, which we all are, that have to obey Einstein. *Space-time itself is free to do its own thing. *Double-A- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - AA Man will never go as far as Oort cloud. Like the meteor belt it has many miles seperating all its stuff.No chance of seeing it like in the movies.Stars in the background are never noticed as being blocked by objects in the cloud. It beg the questio . How did Oort know it was there? How did this guy Oort get a name like Oort? *Bert ""The Oort cloud was "discovered" by Dutch astronomer Jan Hendrik Oort in 1950"" ~ BG To be more precise, the existence of a cloud that is the origin of long-period comets was first set forth by Ernst pik in 1932. Jan Oort revived the idea independently in 1950. pik thought the cloud was relatively small and revolved around the Sun. Oort and following scientists now think of the cloud in two ways, as a spherical cloud that completely surrounds the Solar system, and there is also a disc-shaped component component inside the outer Oort sphere.. The disc-shaped part is thought to be on the ecliptic plane. The Kuiper belt and scattered disc, the other two known reservoirs of trans-Neptunian objects, are less than one thousandth the Oort cloud's distance, which is almost an entire light year away from the Sun. -- **** the Proz Fear Impedes Progress! Fight and Defeat Fear! Thanks for that bit of informative though perfectly terrestrial history that any 5th grader could have posted. *Why don't you tell us something/anything we don't know about the Oort cloud? For example, is there anything out there that's similar or bigger than Sedna? ~ BG Yes. Then perhaps such large and extremely cold items are simply too sooty black to see, and otherwise too carbon coated for radar to detect. So why isn't this area or volume of stuff called the Ernst �pik cloud? ~ BG The cloud is sometimes called the �pik (Opik)-Oort cloud for both it's postulators. -- **** the Proz Fear Impedes Progress! Fight and Defeat Fear!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - HEH. one of my better threads. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pronunciation of Kuiper belt | Yusuf B Gursey | Astronomy Misc | 112 | September 2nd 06 08:51 PM |
End of the Kuiper Belt | [email protected] | Technology | 0 | January 12th 06 05:37 AM |
Kuiper Belt Echoes? | Mitchell Jones | Astronomy Misc | 12 | May 6th 05 03:49 PM |
New Kuiper Belt object | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | March 15th 04 05:11 AM |
Pushing Out The Kuiper Belt | Ron Baalke | Misc | 1 | November 29th 03 01:03 PM |