|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
(I don't believe the theory of everything is a formula.
It explains how matter comes to life, in this explanation it follows a very old energy cycle) Imagine: zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite vaccum. 2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = zero vaccum (in between these two forces is c) meaning there is no black hole formation in regions carrying mass and no white hole formation in vaccums. (don't see it, its ok) One more thing. If g grows to c in the vaccum due to an extension of the Universe, then a likely reaction occurs (due to dark energy rising toward infinity). In that case space curves into itself to form a black hole, in which case: g transforms to speed (energy). Perhaps something like this happens: Near the center of the Milky Way, as matter approaches the event horizon, it heats up. To cool down matter, space is converted out of energy at a certain energy threshold. The same opposite may occur in deep space. As galaxies move apart generating greater and greater vaccums, dark energy grows. As dark energy reaches very high levels, space transforms into heat, energy. Perhaps that means, that the greater the vaccum and dark energy, the warmer the temperature of space becomes. And that coolness is introduced in highly massive and energized zones, where in a way matter is annihilated, but space is warped by this transformation process. oh and since space warms with greater vaccums, it produces radiation CMBR. So the big bang may have been a gradual process of vaccum gaining energy. Since its hard to understand, it will never gain Republican acceptance. And it needs more than two proofs too, and that's too much, in terms of the old models saying that dark energy is mystic, so its not supposed to be not mystic, and that big bang was a bang, it says in the name stupid. So, something was said. The vaccum is slowly transforming into energy (CMBR). -- If there is no supermassive black hole in the core of the Milky Way as predicted based on the descriptions above (there are scientific evidences building up already that the black hole models may fail there, look up no X-Rays found arriving from the nucleus of a quasar, and the magnetic fields of jets are not centrally linear as priorly thought but stronger along the edge of the jets), then simply an opening exists in the core, an eye, a torus, and strong magnetic fields generating strong light toward the North and South poles along the magnetic fields of the jets (if jets are visible). A galaxy facing earth head on with its torus would appear as a quasar, based on my understanding. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
correction: white hole = anti-infinite vaccum, not zero
vaccum, whatever |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite vaccum.
2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = anti-infinite vaccum |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
oh, I was thinking no vaccum at all, never mind, I don't
understand my own theory. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
Its funny how perfectly I imagined it: That CMBR grows as the
vaccum grows, and it gets stronger and stronger as the Universe expands, until energies reach near infinity and bang! Space and radiation transforms in this hot space universe into matter. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
Once mo
I am not a physicist, not even a scientist, perhaps a computer scientist, I have made a few posts on the galaxy nucleus, and sharing my final thoughts with you on the theory of everything, as I see it. Thank you for EVERYTHING! (I don't believe the theory of everything is a formula. It explains how matter comes to life, in this explanation it follows a very old energy cycle) Imagine: zero gravitational field = 0c = black hole = infinite vaccum. 2c = max anti-gravitational field = white hole = zero vaccum (in between these two forces is c) meaning there is no black hole formation in regions carrying mass and no white hole formation in vaccums. (don't see it, its ok) One more thing. If g grows to c in the vaccum due to an extension of the Universe, then a likely reaction occurs (due to dark energy rising toward infinity). In that case space curves into itself to form a black hole, in which case: g transforms to speed (energy). Perhaps something like this happens: Near the center of the Milky Way, as matter approaches the event horizon, it heats up. To cool down matter, space is converted out of energy at a certain energy threshold. The same opposite may occur in deep space. As galaxies move apart generating greater and greater vaccums, dark energy grows. As dark energy reaches very high levels, space transforms into heat, energy. Perhaps that means, that the greater the vaccum and dark energy, the warmer the temperature of space becomes. And that coolness is introduced in highly massive and energized zones, where in a way matter is annihilated, but space is warped by this transformation process. Oh, and since space warms with greater vaccums, it produces radiation CMBR. So the big bang may have been a gradual process of vaccum gaining energy. (And it needs more than two proofs too.) The vaccum is slowly transforming into energy (CMBR). -- If there is no supermassive black hole in the core of the Milky Way as predicted based on the descriptions above (there are scientific evidences building up already that the black hole models may fail there, look up no X-Rays found arriving from the nucleus of a quasar, and the magnetic fields of jets are not centrally linear as priorly thought but stronger along the edge of the jets), then simply an opening exists in the core, an eye, a torus, and strong magnetic fields generating strong light toward the North and South poles along the magnetic fields of the jets (if jets are visible). A galaxy facing earth head on with its torus would appear as a quasar, based on my understanding. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
Oh, still not clarified: Was there a big bang or was
it a result of a gradual process? Personally I think a gradual process of high energy. In the movies I see a big bang. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
Dude, why don't you let the "people with brains" do the job?
Thanx. rAgAv |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
People with brains apparently can't solve it.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Theory of Everything (my attempt)
Poof!!,
Another proof that you're brainless |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Astrophysicists put kibosh on alternative theory of star formation(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | November 17th 05 11:34 PM |
Astrophysicists put kibosh on alternative theory of star formation(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 17th 05 10:29 PM |
About the TRICK in coordinates introduced by Kruskal and Szekeres in 1961 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 10 | August 16th 05 08:06 AM |
Theory of Everything | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 2nd 05 06:55 AM |
The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 9th 04 06:30 AM |