|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. That's simple not true. There would be less or no goldilocks zone. 2 suns would lead to greater swings of temperature which is harder on life. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:43:29 PM UTC-5, casagi.. wrote:
Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. That's simple not true. There would be less or no goldilocks zone. 2 suns would lead to greater swings of temperature which is harder on life. That is not what the scientists are saying. With two or three stars the progression from warmer to cooler is more gradual so two or three stars is better for life. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 3:27:04 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:43:29 PM UTC-5, casagi.. wrote: Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. That's simple not true. There would be less or no goldilocks zone. 2 suns would lead to greater swings of temperature which is harder on life. That is not what the scientists are saying. With two or three stars the progression from warmer to cooler is more gradual so two or three stars is better for life. Binary star systems make for unstable planets! https://arstechnica.com/science/2013...table-planets/ Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 5:56:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 3:27:04 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:43:29 PM UTC-5, casagi.. wrote: Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. That's simple not true. There would be less or no goldilocks zone. 2 suns would lead to greater swings of temperature which is harder on life. That is not what the scientists are saying. With two or three stars the progression from warmer to cooler is more gradual so two or three stars is better for life. Binary star systems make for unstable planets! https://arstechnica.com/science/2013...table-planets/ Double-A I thought that too but astronomers are saying something different on the science channel on "How the Universe Works." I am glad you and Casagi have the courage to take a stand against the system. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:15:09 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 5:56:04 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote: On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 3:27:04 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 4:43:29 PM UTC-5, casagi.. wrote: Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. That's simple not true. There would be less or no goldilocks zone. 2 suns would lead to greater swings of temperature which is harder on life. That is not what the scientists are saying. With two or three stars the progression from warmer to cooler is more gradual so two or three stars is better for life. Binary star systems make for unstable planets! https://arstechnica.com/science/2013...table-planets/ Double-A I thought that too but astronomers are saying something different on the science channel on "How the Universe Works." I am glad you and Casagi have the courage to take a stand against the system. Too bad (or maybe it's a good thing) I can't get the science channel! Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 7:54:41 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. yep nibiru wing 2 brownie together. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:25:57 AM UTC-5, IAM wrote:
On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 7:54:41 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. yep nibiru wing 2 brownie together. What? Could you run that by in proper English please? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 12:05:35 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 2:25:57 AM UTC-5, IAM wrote: On Friday, July 20, 2018 at 7:54:41 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote: Some of our neighbors do and a few of them have three. When this happens it is a bigger goldilocks zone and there are more habitable planets. yep nibiru wing 2 brownie together. What? Could you run that by in proper English please? fxxxkk ennnnglllwwwiiih . Fuxxxk you |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
If only we had Two Suns
Having just one star fits for us.However there are billions of double stars.That could fit too.Bert
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SUNS | blacklight | Policy | 0 | March 28th 07 06:17 AM |
SUNS | blacklight | History | 0 | March 28th 07 06:15 AM |
SUNS | blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 28th 07 06:06 AM |
SUNS | blacklight | Misc | 0 | March 28th 07 06:03 AM |
SUNS | blacklight | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 28th 07 05:59 AM |