A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Timekeeping architecture



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 14, 09:07 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Timekeeping architecture

It is certain that the conversion of the 'average' 24 hour cycle to 'constant' rotation at a rate of 15 degrees per hour is one of the greatest human innovations while keeping an eye on the framework of the 1461 rotations that cover 4 orbital circuits.

There are multiple points of entry into discovering the architecture or the cyclical framework through which the timekeeping utility emerged so all it needs are interested parties who are eager to displace the older false ideas which serve no purpose whatsoever other than to dull the mind and spirit..

It may that the Church is better suited to accepting the more advanced,intricate and enjoyable system where human innovation and planetary cycles overlap in terms of timekeeping structure than the empirical institutions who have stonewalled so far as expected and as is their custom.

No doubt the world will continue to face the same junk of theorists for a while but effectively the chain of indoctrination has just been broken and the new structures and perceptions will eventually emerge .How that will happen I have no idea but humanity will eventually come to enjoy the spectacle of astronomy once more while limiting timekeeping as a useful tool and not the driver of perspectives as it came to be a few centuries ago.

  #2  
Old February 24th 14, 11:00 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Lord Androcles[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 575
Default Timekeeping architecture



"oriel36" wrote in message
...

It is certain that the conversion of the 'average' 24 hour cycle to
'constant' rotation at a rate of 15 degrees per hour

=================================================
15 degrees 2 arcminutes and 30 arcseconds per hour relative to the Sun, 361
degrees a day.
It is certain you will get it wrong and babble like the autistic thug you
are.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway



  #3  
Old February 24th 14, 12:52 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Timekeeping architecture

The main architecture is a joy to behold and especially the referencing system which fixes the Earth's position in space using the apparent trajectory of the stars behind the Sun along the ecliptic plane and the re-emergence of one particular star just far enough to one side of the ecliptic plane to be seen one morning.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=MdFrE7hWj0A

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eeQwYrfmvoQ


The second category in that architecture is the second uneven surface rotation to the central Sun arising from the orbital motion of the planet which combines with daily rotation to create the variations in the natural noon cycle. The planet Uranus provides the appreciation of this architecture to a 100% certainty due to the unique differences between daily rotational and orbital components -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=612gSZsplpE


The flawed architecture of stellar circumpolar motion tied directly to daily rotation was a product of its time and nothing more than a cautionary lesson for this present generation. Breaking the chain of indoctrination is done with visual imaging and the ability of readers to make sense of those condensed motions which discriminate between timekeeping as a human innovation and the planetary dynamics from which the timekeeping systems emerge.

The gift of God is the ability to appreciate how planetary dynamics and timekeeping work together and yet are separate,my gift is allowing people in future to work to a clearer understanding of the systems,the proper references and how it filters down into terrestrial sciences as cause and effect or for solar system structure as cause and perspectives.

  #4  
Old February 24th 14, 05:47 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Lord Androcles[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 575
Default Timekeeping architecture



"oriel36" wrote in message
...
babble deleted

=================================================
15 degrees 2 arcminutes and 30 arcseconds per hour relative to the Sun, 361
degrees a day.
It is certain you will get it wrong and babble like the autistic thug you
are.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

  #5  
Old February 24th 14, 08:40 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Gavino
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Timekeeping architecture

"Lord Androcles" wrote in message ...
15 degrees 2 arcminutes and 30 arcseconds per hour relative to the Sun, 361
degrees a day.


Er, don't you mean relative to Sirius (for example)?
Relative to the sun, it really *is* 360 degrees per day (on average), not 361.
That's how we define a 'day'.



  #6  
Old February 24th 14, 09:37 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Timekeeping architecture

It is always lovely to encounter people who are comfortable with the jobs and the talent behind it so it may someday be possible to see someone else enjoy the architecture which involves a switching element based on using an 'average' 24 hour AM/PM cycle to substitute for 'constant' rotation with the supporting framework contained within the 1461 rotations/4 orbital circuit structure.

Whether it is the architecture of a computer or an oil refinery,the confident and competent person really understands how the component parts fit together but unlike the computer/oil refinery,the elements of timekeeping are extrapolated from specific observations and cycles rather than conclusions imposed on cycles and observations by timekeeping,something people forget when they go about creating fanciful and fiction using the Sun and the other stars.

Presently there is a crowd in great difficulty insofar as they still work off the flawed structure of stellar circumpolar motion and cannot come to grips with the principles which govern the creation of the 24 hour day within the framework of the 1461 rotations it takes the Earth to return to the same position in space.

"Adjustments made in one second steps, known as 'leap seconds', have been implemented since 1972 to compensate for variations in the speed of the earth's rotation within the framework of Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)." ITU

http://www.itu.int/net/pressoffice/p...x#.UwusOvl_uSo

These guys are truly lost,not competent,not confident but lost is a blizzard of voodoo and bluffing created by an error that is now centuries old and has not being corrected up until now and in this forum.

Any reader here can trace the development of timekeeping from its inception through the observation that Sirius skips an appearance by one day thereby fixing the Earth's orbital position in space,after that the pieces come together one by one along with an appreciation of the dynamics behind it.










  #7  
Old February 24th 14, 11:58 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
Lord Androcles[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 575
Default Timekeeping architecture



"Gavino" wrote in message ...

"Lord Androcles" wrote in message
...
15 degrees 2 arcminutes and 30 arcseconds per hour relative to the Sun,
361
degrees a day.


Er, don't you mean relative to Sirius (for example)?
Relative to the sun, it really *is* 360 degrees per day (on average), not
361.
That's how we define a 'day'.
==============================================
From where I'm standing the Sun crosses my sky daily and moves through the
firmament 360 degrees a year.
Standing on the Moon, the Sun crosses my sky daily and moves through the
firmament 360 degrees a year.
"Daily" has a different meaning between Earth and Moon.
If I adopted your suggestion then the Earth seen from the Moon would move
through the firmament 360 degrees a month while the Moon would rotate not at
all relative to the Earth.
This would lead to Kelleher's assertion that the Moon does not rotate.

As the Sun itself rotates at its equator every 25 days and at its poles
every 36 days the only sensible reference for any rotation of any body is
the firmament of heaven. You are of course free to choose any arbitrary
starting or zero point, be it the first point of Aries or Sirius or any
other identifiable point.

Relative to the sun, it really *is* 24 hours per day (on average), not 23
hours and 56 minutes.
That's how we define a 'day'.

You can choose 24 hours and 361 degrees or 23 hours 56 minutes and 360
degrees, you can't choose 24 and 360 or the autistic cretin will be
confused.

-- Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

  #8  
Old February 25th 14, 12:27 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur
oriel36[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,478
Default Timekeeping architecture

Timekeeping architecture binds the division of the 24 hour AM/PM system to the Lat/Long system across the planet's dimensions and rotational characteristics, albeit that the 'average' designation in a 24 hour cycle interchanges with 'constant' rotation as a convenience and from there into the Lat/Long structure.

The time differences spread across 15 degrees of longitude is 1 hour and 1070 miles at the Equator hence 360 degrees amounts to the Earth's 24901 mile circumference. The interplay between the components is therefore any combination the observer chooses -

The Earth turns its 24901 circumference in 24 hours or turns at a rate of 15 degrees per hour,its Equatorial speed is 1070 miles per hour ect so that even now NASA has gotten its act together expressing this fact -

http://image.gsfc.nasa.gov/poetry/ask/a10840.html

The Lat/Long system overlaid on the geographical structure of the Earth is not arbitrary in a sense that it is a consequence of the 1461 rotations it takes to complete 4 annual circuits and the average rotation within each of these cycles. What gets 'averaged' out is the orbital surface rotation component which causes the natural noon inequality when combined with daily rotation hence it allows the assumption that rotation is constant within the two surface rotation combination. This is perhaps the most intricate element of the architecture but it is made all the easier when the observer affirms that aside from and in addition to daily rotation,all locations on Earth turn once to the central Sun.

I have seen many variants of the celestial sphere mob try to justify a framework that is outside the 24 hour and Lat/Long system like some kind of self-mockery -

http://www.universetoday.com/26623/h...-earth-rotate/

I took my cues from participants in this forum over the years that rather than adapt to and adopt the productive architecture of timekeeping and the cyclical references that not only go into creating them but also the limitations that organizations act in similar fashion by digging a bigger hole rather than letting visual imaging,graphics,experience and common sense do the work.

Students and interested adults need to know why one 24 hour day and one rotation of the planet are one and the same and the encompassing reasoning that makes it that way.









 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fundamental unit of human timekeeping oriel36[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 1 October 18th 12 08:51 AM
New Book Discusses Implications of Decoupling Civil Timekeeping from the Earth's Rotation (Forwarded) Andrew Yee[_1_] News 0 January 9th 12 10:01 PM
Timekeeping in Genesis oriel36[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 2 November 11th 11 08:38 PM
Nice discussion of astronomical timekeeping Dave Typinski[_3_] Amateur Astronomy 3 February 14th 10 07:15 AM
Interplanetary timekeeping Jim McCauley Policy 15 June 19th 06 11:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.