Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...
On Oct 14, 5:48 pm, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 4:43 pm, "David Staup" wrote:









"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 12:35 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 10:55 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief "
of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if
the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous
others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

I have taken observations of others as having researched into account,
and I tend to agree with much of what has been observed and
interpreted by others.

you have made observations? others have made observations?

SPECIFIC: specified, precise, or particular

When are you going to observe the best available science? ("never" is
not a very good answer unless you are a pretend Atheist that only acts/
reacts like a Semite)

BTW; Your inability to constructively interpret science isn't my
fault.

LOL
wrong answer goofy

Double ditto, right back at you.

oooh you really got me with that one

such rapier wit

chuckle, chuckle, LOL, ROTFLOL

No wit intended.

So when are you going to tell us how much time we got left before the
big gravity wave does us in?

chuckle
uh never

On Oct 15, 10:07*am, "David Staup" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 5:48 pm, "David Staup" wrote:









"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 4:43 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 12:35 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 10:55 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief "
of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if
the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous
others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

I have taken observations of others as having researched into account,
and I tend to agree with much of what has been observed and
interpreted by others.

you have made observations? others have made observations?

SPECIFIC: specified, precise, or particular

When are you going to observe the best available science? ("never" is
not a very good answer unless you are a pretend Atheist that only acts/
reacts like a Semite)

BTW; Your inability to constructively interpret science isn't my
fault.

LOL
wrong answer goofy

Double ditto, right back at you.

oooh you really got me with that one

such rapier wit

chuckle, chuckle, LOL, ROTFLOL

No wit intended.

So when are you going to tell us how much time we got left before the
big gravity wave does us in?

chuckle
uh never

So, you don't believe in the laws of physics. Why didn't you just say
it to begin with?

I never suggested that a gravity wave was confirmed as heading for us,
but at least unlike you I'm open for discussing the implications or
consequences.

It seems you are simply unable to deal with the topic at hand, unless
you're only here to topic/author stalk little old me because I
represent some new kind of threat.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Oct 14, 3:16*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 14, 1:55*pm, "David Staup" wrote:









"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. *So, just *imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm *If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. *O
ya TreBert
Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. TreBert

On Oct 16, 6:13*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 14, 3:16*pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:







On Oct 14, 1:55*pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. *So, just *imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm *If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. *O
ya TreBert

Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. *TreBert

I'll go along with that. However, neutron stars and black holes or
just spent black dwarf stars do exist, and if they pass too nearby can
cause a lethal tidal force that'll get your attention.

When galaxies interact is also when those multiple and surrounding
tidal forces get extremely interesting and potentially lethal.

Our encounter with the Sirius Oort cloud could become our demise,
because parts of that icy Oort cloud could be exceeding 8.6 ly radii.
The JWST could possibly spot a few of those before they encounter us.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

"G=EMC^2" wrote in message
...
On Oct 14, 3:16 pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 14, 1:55 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. O
ya TreBert

Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. TreBert

---------- Reply below ----------

There could be a 1000 sub atomic particles that we do not even know about
yet. So gravity could still be something spinning in a corkscrew manner.

On Oct 16, 7:44*am, "Rocky" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 3:16 pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:









On Oct 14, 1:55 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. O
ya TreBert

Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. *TreBert

* ---------- *Reply below *----------

There could be a 1000 sub atomic particles that we do not even know about
yet. *So gravity could still be something spinning in a corkscrew manner.

On Oct 13, 2:47*pm, "Rocky" wrote:
Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
*http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

Beside this gravity thing which may or may not exist, our resident
doom and gloom “Warhol” missed this next one by only 128 years.
http://www.slashgear.com/could-a-gig...1883-18188668/
“The recent breakup of the comet would explain the misty appearance
according to the scientists. There were other observatories in the
area, as close as a few hundred kilometers that didn’t see what
Bonilla noted. However, modern scientists explain this because of
parallax. The team says if the fragments were too close to the Earth,
parallax would have meant the chucks of the comet would not have been
in line with the sun and viewable even for observers at nearby
observatories of the time. According to the researchers, Hector
Manterola at the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico
City and his team, the objects would have been as close as 600km to
8000km from Earth for parallax to prevent others from seeing them.”

“The team also estimates that the chunks would have been anywhere from
50 to 800 meters across for the parent comet to have been a billion
tons or more making it roughly the size of Halley’s comet. The team
thinks that the comet could have been Pons-Brooks, which was seen that
same year by astronomers in American. Calculations suggest there could
have been 3275 objects and if they had hit Earth, it would have been
an extinction event.”
-
Perhaps the next time we will not be so lucky, especially as the
Sirius Oort cloud closes in on us.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

ONLY ONE PROBLEM, YOU ****ING NITWIT!

NOTHING HAPPENED, MORON!

Saul Levy


On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 13:08:40 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth
wrote:

Beside this gravity thing which may or may not exist, our resident
doom and gloom “Warhol” missed this next one by only 128 years.
http://www.slashgear.com/could-a-gig...1883-18188668/
“The recent breakup of the comet would explain the misty appearance
according to the scientists. There were other observatories in the
area, as close as a few hundred kilometers that didn’t see what
Bonilla noted. However, modern scientists explain this because of
parallax. The team says if the fragments were too close to the Earth,
parallax would have meant the chucks of the comet would not have been
in line with the sun and viewable even for observers at nearby
observatories of the time. According to the researchers, Hector
Manterola at the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico
City and his team, the objects would have been as close as 600km to
8000km from Earth for parallax to prevent others from seeing them.”

“The team also estimates that the chunks would have been anywhere from
50 to 800 meters across for the parent comet to have been a billion
tons or more making it roughly the size of Halley’s comet. The team
thinks that the comet could have been Pons-Brooks, which was seen that
same year by astronomers in American. Calculations suggest there could
have been 3275 objects and if they had hit Earth, it would have been
an extinction event.”
-
Perhaps the next time we will not be so lucky, especially as the
Sirius Oort cloud closes in on us.

Brad Guth, I'M A DOOM AND GLOOM NITWIT!

On Oct 16, 10:44*am, "Rocky" wrote:
"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 3:16 pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:





On Oct 14, 1:55 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. O
ya TreBert

Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. *TreBert

* ---------- *Reply below *----------

There could be a 1000 sub atomic particles that we do not even know about
yet. *So gravity could still be something spinning in a corkscrew manner.

On Oct 27, 4:59*am, "G=EMC^2" wrote:
On Oct 16, 10:44*am, "Rocky" wrote:









"G=EMC^2" wrote in message

....
On Oct 14, 3:16 pm, "G=EMC^2" wrote:

On Oct 14, 1:55 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 14, 7:31 am, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 3:17 pm, "David Staup" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote in message

...
On Oct 13, 2:47 pm, "Rocky" wrote:

Deadly Gravity Wave Approaching EARTH
http://youtu.be/96cB-HUpAXU

Uploaded by J7409 on Oct 13, 2011

I believe gravity has a 2c velocity, if not faster.

I'm curious bradly, just what observations led to this "belief " of
yours.

be specific please

I do not believe that we can stop photons dead in their tracks if the
force of gravity is only worth c.

snip the rest of your beliefs

I asked for observations, not imaginations

now be specific

Most of whatever got recorded by Einstein, Planck and numerous others
were initially imaginations. So, just imagine what this
interpretation could lead to.

science starts with observation not imagination.

so, last chance, from what observations do you base your hypothesis?

Gravity waves Hmmmm If they come in concave they will crush you to
the center of the Earth. It they come in convex they will blow you
away. You can thank that to me "convex & Concave" gravity theory. O
ya TreBert

Reality is gravity waves have yet to be found.. I think its time to
say that gravity has a field but no waves. *TreBert

* ---------- *Reply below *----------

There could be a 1000 sub atomic particles that we do not even know about
yet. *So gravity could still be something spinning in a corkscrew manner.

Gravity makes no waves. *TreBert

Don't be so absolute certain about that. If gravity isn't moving
relative to Earth, then there's not a wave to behold.

A WD of 2e30 kg passing through our solar system at 30 km/sec
relative to us, and if missing us by 0.1 AU, would likely tare our
planet to shreds. Even a 0.5 AU near miss would be extremely
problematic, if not lethal to most life on Earth as it blew and sucked
a good portion of our atmosphere away, and to think 1 Ms WDs can't be
all that uncommon.

http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”