|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard
This is to announce the start of the public comment period on proposed
changes to update and clarify the "FITS Standard" format definition document. The last major revision to this document was made in 1998 - 1999, so it is due for for an update to reflect changes that have occurred since then. These proposed changes have been recommended by a small technical panel that was appointed by the IAU FITS Working Group in early 2007. This panel has produced 3 documents that describe the proposed changes: 1. A short (9 page) summary of the main recommendations. 2. A color coded "differences" document (137 pages) that shows most of the changes in detail. 3. A draft of the new Standard document (version 3.0, 125 pages) as it would appear if all these changes are accepted. This material is now available for public review and comment via links on the FITS Support Office home page at http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov No radical changes to the FITS format are being proposed, but some of the proposals do modify basic FITS requirements or recommendations. We urge that everyone who uses or is interested in the future of the FITS format should at least read the summary document. Please post any comments, suggestions, or concerns regarding these proposals (or any other suggestions for improving the Standard document) here on the FITSBITS email list, or on the associated sci.astro.fits newsgroup. Comments may also be submitted to any member of the FITS technical panel that produced these recommendations (listed below). This public comment period will remain open at least until the end of September 2007. It is anticipated that these proposals will also be discussed during a session at the ADASS meeting in London, September 23 - 26. These proposals will likely be revised in response to the comments that are received. Eventually, it is expected that the regional FITS committees, and the IAU FITS Working Group, will formally consider adopting the proposed changes. The FITS Technical Panel, William D. Pence (Chair), NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center Lucio Chiappetti, IASF Milano, INAF, Italy Clive G. Page, University of Leicester, UK Richard Shaw, National Optical Astronomical Obs Elizabeth Stobie, University of Arizona -- __________________________________________________ __________________ Dr. William Pence NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice) Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard
Bill, one incompatible change I see is that the EXTEND keyword is no longer mandatory. I am aware of several IDL FITS libraries which follow the existing standard and require the presence of the EXTEND keyword before extensions will be examined. These libraries would no longer function as-is if the EXTEND keyword became optional. Also, the summary mentions an "Appendix E" about time standards, but shouldn't this be Appendix B? Craig Markwardt |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard
Craig Markwardt wrote: Also, the summary mentions an "Appendix E" about time standards, but shouldn't this be Appendix B? Yes. This has now been fixed in the version of the document available from the FITS Support Office web site. Bill Pence |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FITS long integer support (was [fitsbits] ADASS FITS BoF onSunday) | Eric Greisen | FITS | 10 | October 26th 04 08:14 AM |
FITS long integer support (was [fitsbits] ADASS FITS BoFon Sunday) | William Pence | FITS | 6 | October 22nd 04 08:23 PM |
FITS long integer support (was [fitsbits] ADASS FITS BoF onSunday) | Thomas McGlynn | FITS | 0 | October 20th 04 03:18 PM |
[fitsbits] proposed FITS MIME types Internet Draft | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | October 1st 03 05:49 AM |