No Explanation for the Sun

No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last ten billion

years.

The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.


Who says it was all hydrogen?

Double-A

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.


Who says it was all hydrogen?

Double-A


Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not.

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:39:23 PM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 3:21:25 PM UTC-5, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.


Who says it was all hydrogen?

Double-A


Hydrogen is everywhere you go in space. The other elements are not.


Current thinking is that the Sun formed from the debris left from an older star that exploded. Many different elements would have been fused in that star and spread about this vicinity.

Double-A

On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:21:25 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.


Who says it was all hydrogen?

Double-A

Stars are created by nebular clouds.Read up on them and get the imperial thinking picture.Eagle is the one I like best.My thoughts are why they are not more round.Bert

On Saturday, July 21, 2018 at 12:37:31 PM UTC-5, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:21:25 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 11:43:08 AM UTC-7, Mark Earnest wrote:
On Saturday, July 14, 2018 at 1:34:41 PM UTC-5, casagi... wrote:
The Sun is a G-type main-sequence star (G2V) based on its spectral
class. As such, it is informally and not completely accurately
referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than
yellow). It formed approximately 4.6 billion[a][10][19] years ago from
the gravitational collapse of matter ( mostly hydrogen ) within a
region of a large molecular cloud. Most of this matter gathered in the
center, whereas the rest flattened into an orbiting disk that became
the Solar System. The central mass became so hot and dense that it
eventually initiated nuclear fusion in its core. It is thought that
almost all stars form by this process.


That is simply not true. Free hydrogen atoms do not collapse to a center--they

are a gas and gases dissipate.


Who says it was all hydrogen?

Double-A

Stars are created by nebular clouds.Read up on them and get the imperial thinking picture.Eagle is the one I like best.My thoughts are why they are not more round.Bert

Nebulas are places where there is a lot of hydrogen and where a lot of stars

get together and decide to be born.

Mark Earnest wrote:
No way swirling masses of hydrogen formed into a star that would last
ten billion

years.




Oh oh,....ya discovered our little secret.
Every night the old sun is towed away to a Russian rebuilding facility, and
replaced by a factory certified identical unit by morning.